Tracking Varietal Authentication of Rice Brands in Bangladesh: Analyzing the Path from Farm to Market

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRONOMY Agricultural Research Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s40003-024-00698-7
Mohammad Chhiddikur Rahman, Md Shajedur Rahaman, Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar, Valerien O. Pede, Mohammad Ariful Islam, Md Shahjahan Kabir
{"title":"Tracking Varietal Authentication of Rice Brands in Bangladesh: Analyzing the Path from Farm to Market","authors":"Mohammad Chhiddikur Rahman,&nbsp;Md Shajedur Rahaman,&nbsp;Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar,&nbsp;Valerien O. Pede,&nbsp;Mohammad Ariful Islam,&nbsp;Md Shahjahan Kabir","doi":"10.1007/s40003-024-00698-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Market traders have recently deceived consumers about the quality and fair price of rice in Bangladesh, causing serious health concerns and unintended financial losses for consumers. Therefore, this study explores the availability, market share, concentration, and traces the varietal origin of popular rice brands in the market. Moreover, it shows the food security consequences of over-polishing in the manufacture of popular rice brands. Primary data were collected through an intensive survey with rice farmers, paddy and rice traders, and millers. We employed a snowball sampling technique and evaluated 30 different supply chains as case studies to find out the varietal sources of different rice brands. The results show that BR28 was the most popular rice brand, representing about 40% of the rice available in the Upazila-level markets, followed by Miniket (17.7%), Swarna (14.5%), BR29 (12.1%), and others (15.7%). In contrast, in the city markets, the contribution of Miniket was the highest (33.5%), followed by BR28 (19.4%), Zira (19.2%), Nazir (8.5%), and others (19.4%). The traders and millers did not confirm any specific variety against the available popular rice brands in the markets. We explored the varietal origin and found that the brand name Miniket is given to every kind of rice that falls under the medium-slender-type grain category. The market traders concentrated on producing the top four to five rice brands without exercising competition. Producing rice brands by over-polishing and receiving returns from by-products are indeed a double-edged benefit for millers, whereas consumers are paying more for finer polished rice without considering its nutritional value. Therefore, strong market regulations, notably on rice milling and branding, should be enforced to protect against adverse health conditions and financial losses, and also to ensure food and nutrition security in Bangladesh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7553,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Research","volume":"13 2","pages":"352 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-024-00698-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Market traders have recently deceived consumers about the quality and fair price of rice in Bangladesh, causing serious health concerns and unintended financial losses for consumers. Therefore, this study explores the availability, market share, concentration, and traces the varietal origin of popular rice brands in the market. Moreover, it shows the food security consequences of over-polishing in the manufacture of popular rice brands. Primary data were collected through an intensive survey with rice farmers, paddy and rice traders, and millers. We employed a snowball sampling technique and evaluated 30 different supply chains as case studies to find out the varietal sources of different rice brands. The results show that BR28 was the most popular rice brand, representing about 40% of the rice available in the Upazila-level markets, followed by Miniket (17.7%), Swarna (14.5%), BR29 (12.1%), and others (15.7%). In contrast, in the city markets, the contribution of Miniket was the highest (33.5%), followed by BR28 (19.4%), Zira (19.2%), Nazir (8.5%), and others (19.4%). The traders and millers did not confirm any specific variety against the available popular rice brands in the markets. We explored the varietal origin and found that the brand name Miniket is given to every kind of rice that falls under the medium-slender-type grain category. The market traders concentrated on producing the top four to five rice brands without exercising competition. Producing rice brands by over-polishing and receiving returns from by-products are indeed a double-edged benefit for millers, whereas consumers are paying more for finer polished rice without considering its nutritional value. Therefore, strong market regulations, notably on rice milling and branding, should be enforced to protect against adverse health conditions and financial losses, and also to ensure food and nutrition security in Bangladesh.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟踪孟加拉国大米品牌的品种认证:分析从农场到市场的路径
最近,孟加拉国市场上的商贩在大米的质量和公平价格方面欺骗消费者,给消费者造成严重的健康问题和意外的经济损失。因此,本研究探讨了市场上流行大米品牌的可用性、市场份额、集中度并追溯其品种来源。此外,研究还揭示了流行大米品牌生产过程中过度抛光对食品安全造成的影响。我们通过对稻农、稻谷和大米贸易商以及碾磨商的深入调查收集了原始数据。我们采用 "滚雪球 "抽样技术,对 30 个不同的供应链进行了案例研究,以找出不同大米品牌的品种来源。结果显示,BR28 是最受欢迎的大米品牌,约占乡级市场大米供应量的 40%,其次是 Miniket(17.7%)、Swarna(14.5%)、BR29(12.1%)和其他(15.7%)。相比之下,在城市市场,Miniket 的贡献率最高(33.5%),其次是 BR28(19.4%)、Zira(19.2%)、Nazir(8.5%)和其他(19.4%)。贸易商和碾米商没有根据市场上现有的流行大米品牌确认任何特定品种。我们对品种来源进行了探究,发现 Miniket 品牌被赋予了每一种属于中等细长型谷物类别的大米。市场上的商贩集中生产排名前四至前五位的大米品牌,不进行竞争。通过过度碾米生产大米品牌,并从副产品中获得收益,这对碾米商来说确实是双刃剑,而消费者却在不考虑大米营养价值的情况下,为更精细的碾米支付更高的价格。因此,应实施强有力的市场法规,特别是关于碾米和品牌的法规,以防止出现不利的健康状况和经济损失,并确保孟加拉国的粮食和营养安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The main objective of this initiative is to promote agricultural research and development. The journal will publish high quality original research papers and critical reviews on emerging fields and concepts for providing future directions. The publications will include both applied and basic research covering the following disciplines of agricultural sciences: Genetic resources, genetics and breeding, biotechnology, physiology, biochemistry, management of biotic and abiotic stresses, and nutrition of field crops, horticultural crops, livestock and fishes; agricultural meteorology, environmental sciences, forestry and agro forestry, agronomy, soils and soil management, microbiology, water management, agricultural engineering and technology, agricultural policy, agricultural economics, food nutrition, agricultural statistics, and extension research; impact of climate change and the emerging technologies on agriculture, and the role of agricultural research and innovation for development.
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Tomorrow: A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Innovations in the Philippines (2018–2023) Exploring Oxyfluorfen's Environmental Fate: Soil Affinity, Persistence, Degradation Dynamics and Ecological Implications Examining the Prevalence and Predictors of Stunting in Indian Children: A Spatial and Multilevel Analysis Approach Buzzing for Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica): Exploring Insect Pollinators, Their Behaviour, Single-Visit Efficiency and the Significance of Honey Bees in Yield Enhancement An Investigation on the Present Status of Wetlands in Majuli River Island; The World Largest River Island and Its Fishery Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1