Hosting and hoping on social media – a study on SoMe communication strategies among Danish cultural institutions and tourist attractions during COVID-19

Karina Villumsen, Hanne Elmer, Line Schmeltz
{"title":"Hosting and hoping on social media – a study on SoMe communication strategies among Danish cultural institutions and tourist attractions during COVID-19","authors":"Karina Villumsen, Hanne Elmer, Line Schmeltz","doi":"10.1108/ccij-06-2023-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe COVID-19 lockdown severely impacted organizations in the cultural and tourist business as their products all of a sudden “disappeared”. This study aims to explore if and how the unexpected and disruptive nature of the pandemic accelerated the development of new communication strategies on their social media.Design/methodology/approachThe study draws on data from 24 midsize cultural institutions and tourist attractions in Denmark over the first two months of the lockdown in 2020. Approximately 900 posts on Facebook were collected and analyzed through the netnographic method. The analysis followed a two-layered qualitative approach. First, open coding to identify typologies and enable a comparison with established strategies from the literature review. Then, an exploratory examination was conducted across the typologies.FindingsNine different content categories were identified in the data and subsequently assessed and discussed in relation to the literature on strategies and dialogic intentions. This resulted in the emergence of two new overarching strategies: hope and host.Practical implicationsWhile hope is particularly relevant in crisis situations, the utilization of employees in the host role presents an opportunity for further development and engagement. Further, the results call for future research that breaks with the traditional quest for ideal strategies for the benefit of exploring the notion of “strategic doers”.Originality/valueThe identification of the hope and host strategies, along with the analysis of content categories and their alignment with various strategic intentions, contributes to the existing knowledge in this field. Further, the classic perception of engagement as driven by explicit interaction and dialogue is also challenged.","PeriodicalId":504506,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-06-2023-0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe COVID-19 lockdown severely impacted organizations in the cultural and tourist business as their products all of a sudden “disappeared”. This study aims to explore if and how the unexpected and disruptive nature of the pandemic accelerated the development of new communication strategies on their social media.Design/methodology/approachThe study draws on data from 24 midsize cultural institutions and tourist attractions in Denmark over the first two months of the lockdown in 2020. Approximately 900 posts on Facebook were collected and analyzed through the netnographic method. The analysis followed a two-layered qualitative approach. First, open coding to identify typologies and enable a comparison with established strategies from the literature review. Then, an exploratory examination was conducted across the typologies.FindingsNine different content categories were identified in the data and subsequently assessed and discussed in relation to the literature on strategies and dialogic intentions. This resulted in the emergence of two new overarching strategies: hope and host.Practical implicationsWhile hope is particularly relevant in crisis situations, the utilization of employees in the host role presents an opportunity for further development and engagement. Further, the results call for future research that breaks with the traditional quest for ideal strategies for the benefit of exploring the notion of “strategic doers”.Originality/valueThe identification of the hope and host strategies, along with the analysis of content categories and their alignment with various strategic intentions, contributes to the existing knowledge in this field. Further, the classic perception of engagement as driven by explicit interaction and dialogue is also challenged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体上的主持和希望--COVID-19 期间丹麦文化机构和旅游景点 SoMe 传播战略研究
目的 COVID-19 的封锁严重影响了文化和旅游机构,因为它们的产品突然 "消失 "了。本研究旨在探讨大流行病的突发性和破坏性是否以及如何加速了这些机构在社交媒体上制定新的传播策略。本研究利用了丹麦 24 家中型文化机构和旅游景点在 2020 年封锁期头两个月的数据。通过网络统计方法收集并分析了 Facebook 上的约 900 条帖子。分析采用了两层定性方法。首先,通过开放式编码确定类型,并与文献综述中的既定策略进行比较。结果在数据中确定了九个不同的内容类别,随后根据有关策略和对话意图的文献进行了评估和讨论。实际意义虽然希望在危机情况下尤为重要,但利用员工的东道主角色为进一步发展和参与提供了机会。此外,研究结果还呼吁未来的研究打破传统的理想战略追求,以探索 "战略行动者 "的概念。原创性/价值对希望战略和东道主战略的识别,以及对内容类别及其与各种战略意图一致性的分析,为该领域的现有知识做出了贡献。此外,关于参与是由明确的互动和对话驱动的传统观念也受到了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letters as organizational rhetoric on environmental social and governance (ESG): the case of Larry Fink and BlackRock from 2018 to 2023 Letters as organizational rhetoric on environmental social and governance (ESG): the case of Larry Fink and BlackRock from 2018 to 2023 A limit to how much you can plan – planned and improvised strategic communication during COVID-19 Challenges of strategic digital communications in local media industries during the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia, North Macedonia and Bulgaria From greenwashing to greenbleaching: green communication and mitigating moral outrage in the context of revisited situational crisis communication theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1