Experimental Study on Mechanical and Durability Behaviour of a Sustainable Masonry Block Incorporating Agricultural and Industrial Wastes

R. Prakash, S. Srividhya, S. Sivakumar, P. Neelamegam
{"title":"Experimental Study on Mechanical and Durability Behaviour of a Sustainable Masonry Block Incorporating Agricultural and Industrial Wastes","authors":"R. Prakash, S. Srividhya, S. Sivakumar, P. Neelamegam","doi":"10.17485/ijst/v17i9.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The production of conventional cement blocks consumes significant amount of cement. The production of cement, involves significant energy consumption and releases carbon dioxide emissions, contributing to carbon footprint. However, advancements in sustainable masonry block production have been made to minimize these drawbacks. Hence, this research aims to develop a sustainable masonry solid block by incorporating Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and Flay Ash (FA). Methods: The manuscript discusses the mechanical and durability properties of sustainable masonry block and comparing the result with the conventional cement blocks. The materials used are FA, Lime, Gypsum, RHA, Marble Dust Powder (MDP), Stone Quarry Dust (SQD). The solid blocks tested for Compressive strength, Density, Water absorption, Initial rate of water absorption, efflorescence, and chemical resistance. Findings: The results showed that, the addition of RHA, FA, and MDP enhanced the compressive strength of the solid blocks upto 46% when compared to convention cement block. A density reduction of 2.5% was achieved. It also exhibited a reduction in water absorption of 29.2%. IRA tests evident that the sustainable solid blocks shows reduced water absorption levels at both the one-minute and two-minute time intervals in comparison to conventional cement solid blocks. At a one-minute time, the rate of absorption for M4 is 69% lower when compared to conventional cement solid blocks. The RHA, FA and MDP admixed blocks showed better durability properties in terms of efflorescence, and chemical resistance. Novelty : This solid block production method is an innovative methodology that supports the conservation of natural resources, reduces pollution, and preserves the environment. As a result, it encourages the advancement of eco-friendly technology. Keywords: Sustainable building blocks, Fly ash, Lime, Rice husk ash, Marble dust, Stone quarry dust","PeriodicalId":508200,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Science And Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Science And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v17i9.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The production of conventional cement blocks consumes significant amount of cement. The production of cement, involves significant energy consumption and releases carbon dioxide emissions, contributing to carbon footprint. However, advancements in sustainable masonry block production have been made to minimize these drawbacks. Hence, this research aims to develop a sustainable masonry solid block by incorporating Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and Flay Ash (FA). Methods: The manuscript discusses the mechanical and durability properties of sustainable masonry block and comparing the result with the conventional cement blocks. The materials used are FA, Lime, Gypsum, RHA, Marble Dust Powder (MDP), Stone Quarry Dust (SQD). The solid blocks tested for Compressive strength, Density, Water absorption, Initial rate of water absorption, efflorescence, and chemical resistance. Findings: The results showed that, the addition of RHA, FA, and MDP enhanced the compressive strength of the solid blocks upto 46% when compared to convention cement block. A density reduction of 2.5% was achieved. It also exhibited a reduction in water absorption of 29.2%. IRA tests evident that the sustainable solid blocks shows reduced water absorption levels at both the one-minute and two-minute time intervals in comparison to conventional cement solid blocks. At a one-minute time, the rate of absorption for M4 is 69% lower when compared to conventional cement solid blocks. The RHA, FA and MDP admixed blocks showed better durability properties in terms of efflorescence, and chemical resistance. Novelty : This solid block production method is an innovative methodology that supports the conservation of natural resources, reduces pollution, and preserves the environment. As a result, it encourages the advancement of eco-friendly technology. Keywords: Sustainable building blocks, Fly ash, Lime, Rice husk ash, Marble dust, Stone quarry dust
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掺入农业和工业废料的可持续砌块的力学和耐久性实验研究
目的:生产传统水泥砖需要消耗大量水泥。生产水泥需要消耗大量能源,并排放二氧化碳,造成碳足迹。然而,可持续砌块生产技术的进步已将这些弊端降至最低。因此,本研究旨在通过加入稻壳灰(RHA)和粉煤灰(FA),开发一种可持续砌筑实心砌块。研究方法手稿讨论了可持续砌块的机械和耐久性能,并将结果与传统水泥砌块进行了比较。使用的材料有 FA、石灰、石膏、RHA、大理石粉(MDP)和石矿粉(SQD)。对实心砌块进行了抗压强度、密度、吸水率、初始吸水率、风化和耐化学性测试。测试结果结果表明,与传统水泥砌块相比,添加 RHA、FA 和 MDP 可使实心砌块的抗压强度提高 46%。密度降低了 2.5%。吸水率也降低了 29.2%。IRA 试验表明,与传统水泥实心砌块相比,可持续实心砌块在一分钟和两分钟时间间隔内的吸水率都有所降低。与传统水泥实心砌块相比,在一分钟的时间间隔内,M4 的吸水率降低了 69%。RHA、FA 和 MDP 混合砌块在防风化和耐化学性方面表现出更好的耐久性能。新颖性:这种实心砌块生产方法是一种创新方法,有助于保护自然资源、减少污染和保护环境。因此,它有助于推动生态友好型技术的发展。关键词可持续建筑砌块、粉煤灰、石灰、稻壳灰、大理石粉尘、采石场粉尘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical and Finite Element Analysis of Pressure Vessel Image Analysis and Classification Using HRSVM-CNN for Land-Cover Classification by Using Remote Sensing Images Lattice Ordered G􀀀Semirings On the Solution of Blasius Boundary Layer Equations of Prandtl-Eyring Fluid Flow Past a Stretching Sheet Optimizing High Data Rate Up to 2.5 Tbps Transmission using 64-Channel DWDM System with DCF and NRZ Modulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1