Blood Pressure Management Following Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Feasibility Trial and Meta‐Analysis of Outcomes

A. Katsanos, L. Catanese, Demetrios J. Sahlas, A. Srivastava, A. Veroniki, Kanjana Perera, Kelvin K. H. Ng, Raed A Joundi, B. van Adel, Ramiro Larrazabal, Christine Hawkes, A. Deshmukh, Kanchana Ratnayake, L. Palaiodimou, G. Tsivgoulis, Oscar R. Benavente, Robert G Hart, Mukul A Sharma, A. Shoamanesh
{"title":"Blood Pressure Management Following Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Feasibility Trial and Meta‐Analysis of Outcomes","authors":"A. Katsanos, L. Catanese, Demetrios J. Sahlas, A. Srivastava, A. Veroniki, Kanjana Perera, Kelvin K. H. Ng, Raed A Joundi, B. van Adel, Ramiro Larrazabal, Christine Hawkes, A. Deshmukh, Kanchana Ratnayake, L. Palaiodimou, G. Tsivgoulis, Oscar R. Benavente, Robert G Hart, Mukul A Sharma, A. Shoamanesh","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Although postprocedure blood pressure (BP) correlates with outcome in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), the optimal target is unknown.\n \n \n \n We performed a pilot randomized‐controlled clinical trial enrolling participants with persistently elevated BP after successful EVT. Participants were randomized within 1 hour from the end of EVT to either intensive (systolic BP target <140 mmHg) or standard BP target (systolic BP <180 mmHg) for 48 hours. The main end point was feasibility, which was assessed with the enrollment rate and adherence to allocated BP target. Exploratory end points included neurologic deterioration, functional improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and flow dynamics detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. We included the outcomes of our trial in an aggregate data meta‐analysis of randomized‐controlled clinical trials evaluating the utility of BP control after successful EVT. The primary outcome of the meta‐analysis was 3‐month good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2.\n \n \n \n \n Between October 23, 2020, and February 4, 2023, 221 patients were screened and 30 were randomized (14%; average recruitment of 1.2 participants/month). Participants in the intensive BP arm had a mean±SD systolic BP of 131±18 mm Hg over 48 hours (75% of the readings were <140 mm Hg), whereas participants in the standard BP arm had a mean±SD 48‐hour systolic BP of 139±18 mm Hg (48% of the readings were between 140 and 180 mm Hg). No differences between the 2 groups were documented in any of the predefined exploratory end points. In a meta‐analysis of 5 randomized‐controlled clinical trials involving 1558 participants, intensive BP control was associated with lower probability for 3‐month good functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53–0.82]; I\n 2\n  = 8%) when compared with standard BP control.\n \n \n \n \n The natural course of BP normalization following successful recanalization poses challenges to the conduct and success of randomized‐controlled clinical trials evaluating different BP thresholds after EVT. Meta‐analysis of existing trials suggests harm associated with active BP lowering.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although postprocedure blood pressure (BP) correlates with outcome in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), the optimal target is unknown. We performed a pilot randomized‐controlled clinical trial enrolling participants with persistently elevated BP after successful EVT. Participants were randomized within 1 hour from the end of EVT to either intensive (systolic BP target <140 mmHg) or standard BP target (systolic BP <180 mmHg) for 48 hours. The main end point was feasibility, which was assessed with the enrollment rate and adherence to allocated BP target. Exploratory end points included neurologic deterioration, functional improvement, intracranial hemorrhage, and flow dynamics detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. We included the outcomes of our trial in an aggregate data meta‐analysis of randomized‐controlled clinical trials evaluating the utility of BP control after successful EVT. The primary outcome of the meta‐analysis was 3‐month good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2. Between October 23, 2020, and February 4, 2023, 221 patients were screened and 30 were randomized (14%; average recruitment of 1.2 participants/month). Participants in the intensive BP arm had a mean±SD systolic BP of 131±18 mm Hg over 48 hours (75% of the readings were <140 mm Hg), whereas participants in the standard BP arm had a mean±SD 48‐hour systolic BP of 139±18 mm Hg (48% of the readings were between 140 and 180 mm Hg). No differences between the 2 groups were documented in any of the predefined exploratory end points. In a meta‐analysis of 5 randomized‐controlled clinical trials involving 1558 participants, intensive BP control was associated with lower probability for 3‐month good functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53–0.82]; I 2  = 8%) when compared with standard BP control. The natural course of BP normalization following successful recanalization poses challenges to the conduct and success of randomized‐controlled clinical trials evaluating different BP thresholds after EVT. Meta‐analysis of existing trials suggests harm associated with active BP lowering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内卒中治疗后的血压管理:可行性试验和结果的元分析
虽然手术后血压(BP)与接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)患者的预后相关,但最佳目标血压尚不清楚。 我们进行了一项试验性随机对照临床试验,招募了 EVT 成功后血压持续升高的患者。参与者在 EVT 结束后 1 小时内被随机分配到强化(收缩压目标值小于 140 mmHg)或标准血压目标值(收缩压小于 180 mmHg),持续 48 小时。主要终点是可行性,通过入选率和对所分配血压目标的依从性进行评估。探索性终点包括神经功能恶化、功能改善、颅内出血和经颅多普勒超声检测到的血流动态。我们将试验结果纳入了一项随机对照临床试验的汇总数据荟萃分析,该分析评估了 EVT 成功后血压控制的效用。荟萃分析的主要结果是3个月的良好功能预后,即改良Rankin量表评分≤2分。 在 2020 年 10 月 23 日至 2023 年 2 月 4 日期间,共筛选出 221 名患者,并对 30 名患者进行了随机分组(14%;平均每月招募 1.2 名参与者)。强化血压组参与者 48 小时收缩压的平均值(±SD)为 131±18 mm Hg(75% 的读数小于 140 mm Hg),而标准血压组参与者 48 小时收缩压的平均值(±SD)为 139±18 mm Hg(48% 的读数介于 140 和 180 mm Hg 之间)。在任何预定的探索性终点方面,两组之间均无差异。在一项对 5 项随机对照临床试验(涉及 1558 名参与者)的荟萃分析中,与标准血压控制相比,强化血压控制与 3 个月功能良好的概率较低(几率比为 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82]; I 2 = 8%)。 成功再通后血压恢复正常的自然过程给评估 EVT 后不同血压阈值的随机对照临床试验的开展和成功带来了挑战。对现有试验的 Meta 分析表明,主动降低血压会带来伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1