Targeted Liberalization: China's foreign investment regulation reform and its post‐WTO‐accession export surge

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of International Economics Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI:10.1111/roie.12737
Yang Liang, Mary E. Lovely, Hongsheng Zhang
{"title":"Targeted Liberalization: China's foreign investment regulation reform and its post‐WTO‐accession export surge","authors":"Yang Liang, Mary E. Lovely, Hongsheng Zhang","doi":"10.1111/roie.12737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To gain membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China substantially modified its regulation of foreign direct investment. These reforms coincided with rapid changes in the composition of capital inflows, as the dominant entry mode shifted from joint venture to wholly foreign owned affiliate. Foreign‐invested enterprises contributed a rising share of China's rapidly growing exports. We investigate how much China's foreign ownership liberalization contributed to these observed trends in foreign investment flows and Chinese exports. Accounting for both the set of activities from which it removed foreign equity caps and those into which it newly encouraged investment, we estimate the impact of China's reforms on firm entry and exports using a difference‐in‐differences estimator. To eliminate bias resulting from heterogeneous and dynamic treatment effects, we also apply novel dynamic difference‐in‐differences estimators. We find that removal of foreign equity caps induced entry of wholly foreign owned firms, while having no significant effect on entry of new joint ventures. Concurrently, the designation of new activities for investment incentives induced foreign entry, particularly in the form of joint ventures. Reduced‐form calculations imply that FDI policy changes explain almost 9% of the increase in exports from foreign‐invested firms over the decade studied. The effect was larger in sectors identified as “high‐tech industries” by the Chinese government, as they contribute most of the estimated policy‐driven export growth from foreign‐invested firms. Thus, China's FDI regulation reform following WTO entry was targeted liberalization: elimination of equity share limits induced new foreign entry, while investment incentives encouraged formation of joint ventures.","PeriodicalId":47712,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To gain membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China substantially modified its regulation of foreign direct investment. These reforms coincided with rapid changes in the composition of capital inflows, as the dominant entry mode shifted from joint venture to wholly foreign owned affiliate. Foreign‐invested enterprises contributed a rising share of China's rapidly growing exports. We investigate how much China's foreign ownership liberalization contributed to these observed trends in foreign investment flows and Chinese exports. Accounting for both the set of activities from which it removed foreign equity caps and those into which it newly encouraged investment, we estimate the impact of China's reforms on firm entry and exports using a difference‐in‐differences estimator. To eliminate bias resulting from heterogeneous and dynamic treatment effects, we also apply novel dynamic difference‐in‐differences estimators. We find that removal of foreign equity caps induced entry of wholly foreign owned firms, while having no significant effect on entry of new joint ventures. Concurrently, the designation of new activities for investment incentives induced foreign entry, particularly in the form of joint ventures. Reduced‐form calculations imply that FDI policy changes explain almost 9% of the increase in exports from foreign‐invested firms over the decade studied. The effect was larger in sectors identified as “high‐tech industries” by the Chinese government, as they contribute most of the estimated policy‐driven export growth from foreign‐invested firms. Thus, China's FDI regulation reform following WTO entry was targeted liberalization: elimination of equity share limits induced new foreign entry, while investment incentives encouraged formation of joint ventures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有针对性的自由化:中国的外商投资监管改革与入世后的出口激增
为了在 2001 年加入世界贸易组织(WTO),中国大幅修改了外商直接投资管理条例。在进行这些改革的同时,资本流入的构成也发生了迅速变化,主要的进入模式从合资企业转变为外商独资企业。外商投资企业在中国快速增长的出口中所占份额不断上升。我们研究了中国的外资所有权自由化在多大程度上促进了外资流动和中国出口的这些趋势。考虑到中国取消外资股比限制的活动和新鼓励投资的活动,我们采用差分估计法估算了中国改革对企业进入和出口的影响。为了消除异质性和动态处理效应带来的偏差,我们还采用了新颖的动态差分估计方法。我们发现,取消外资股比上限促进了外商独资企业的进入,而对新合资企业的进入没有显著影响。与此同时,指定新的投资激励活动也促进了外资的进入,尤其是以合资企业的形式。简化形式的计算表明,在所研究的十年间,外国直接投资政策的变化几乎解释了外商投资企业出口增长的 9%。在被中国政府认定为 "高科技产业 "的行业中,这种影响更大,因为这些行业在政策驱动的外商投资企业出口增长中贡献最大。因此,中国在加入世贸组织后进行的外国直接投资监管改革是有针对性的自由化:取消股权限制促使新的外资进入,而投资激励措施则鼓励成立合资企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Review of International Economics is devoted to the publication of high-quality articles on a full range of topics in international economics. The Review comprises controversial and innovative thought and detailed contributions from other directly related fields such as economic development; trade and the environment; and political economy. Whether theoretical, empirical or policy-oriented, its relevance to real world problems is of paramount concern.
期刊最新文献
Determinants and international transmission of interest rates: Do foreign reserves and sovereign debt matter? A footloose capital model of economic development Optimal management of international reserves International attractiveness of cities: The drivers of urban FDI Firm‐level prices, quality, and markups: The role of immigrant workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1