The issue of parties’ participation in technical activities related to the boundaries of parcels

IF 0.3 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.2478/rgg-2024-0003
Marcin Karabin, Robert Łuczyński
{"title":"The issue of parties’ participation in technical activities related to the boundaries of parcels","authors":"Marcin Karabin, Robert Łuczyński","doi":"10.2478/rgg-2024-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Participation of the parties in works related to the boundaries a˛ects the determination of boundaries according to the owners’ consistent indications, or allows for an appropriate reaction when determining the boundary points of the previously ~xed boundaries, i.e. referring the case to court in the event of a dispute regarding the location of boundary marks. It is important that the owners of neighboring parcels know their boundaries before any investment activities. The lack of this knowledge combined with the lack of legal security regarding boundaries in the event of con˚icts between owners of neighboring parcels may result in, in addition to sending the case to court, serious consequences, e.g. demolition of a fence built in the wrong place, demolition of a house built too close to the boundary. The legal solutions discussed here concern the Polish cadastre, but the issue itself can be said to go beyond the local scale as it potentially concerns the problem of properly determining the scope of ownership rights (boundaries) to parcels in other countries. The article discusses and analyzes the documentation prepared by licensed surveyors in the context of the validity of applicable boundary procedures in Poland regarding the participation of the parties in these activities. Analyzes have proven that focusing these procedures on correctly notifying the parties about given boundary activities is not the right approach. Such solutions only bring results in terms of correctly notifying the parties about the activities and do not lead to their actual participation in them.","PeriodicalId":42010,"journal":{"name":"Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2024-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation of the parties in works related to the boundaries a˛ects the determination of boundaries according to the owners’ consistent indications, or allows for an appropriate reaction when determining the boundary points of the previously ~xed boundaries, i.e. referring the case to court in the event of a dispute regarding the location of boundary marks. It is important that the owners of neighboring parcels know their boundaries before any investment activities. The lack of this knowledge combined with the lack of legal security regarding boundaries in the event of con˚icts between owners of neighboring parcels may result in, in addition to sending the case to court, serious consequences, e.g. demolition of a fence built in the wrong place, demolition of a house built too close to the boundary. The legal solutions discussed here concern the Polish cadastre, but the issue itself can be said to go beyond the local scale as it potentially concerns the problem of properly determining the scope of ownership rights (boundaries) to parcels in other countries. The article discusses and analyzes the documentation prepared by licensed surveyors in the context of the validity of applicable boundary procedures in Poland regarding the participation of the parties in these activities. Analyzes have proven that focusing these procedures on correctly notifying the parties about given boundary activities is not the right approach. Such solutions only bring results in terms of correctly notifying the parties about the activities and do not lead to their actual participation in them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各方参与地块边界相关技术活动的问题
各方参与边界相关工程会影响根据业主的一致指示确定边界,或在确定先前确定的边界的边界点时做出适当反应,即在边界标志位置发生争议时将案件提交法院。在进行任何投资活动之前,相邻地块的所有者必须了解其边界。如果缺乏这方面的知识,再加上在相邻地块的所有 者之间发生纠纷时缺乏有关边界的法律保障,除了 将案件提交法院外,还可能导致严重的后果,如拆 除建在错误位置的围墙、拆除建在离边界太近的房 屋等。本文讨论的法律解决方案涉及波兰的地籍,但问题本身可以说超出了当地范围,因为它可能涉及到正确确定其他国家地块所有权(边界)范围的问题。这篇文章讨论并分析了波兰适用的边界程序中有关各方参与这些活动的有效性方面,持证测量师所准备的文件。分析表明,将这些程序的重点放在正确通知各方有关特定边界活动上并不是正确的方法。这种解决方案只能带来正确通知各方有关活动的结果,而不会导致他们实际参与这些活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geoprocessing of archival aerial photos and their scientific applications: A review Investigation of the accuracy of BeiDou, QZSS and QZSS/BeiDou satellites configuration for short, medium and long baselines in the Asia-Pacific regions Site-specific efficient management of soil resources using GIS and BIM technologies Accuracy of the application of mobile technologies for measurements made in headings of the Kłodawa Salt Mine Accuracy assessment of high and ultra high-resolution combined GGMs, and recent satellite-only GGMs – Case studies of Poland and Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1