Assessment of vascular age and cardiovascular risk factors among young women in the Moscow region

T. Chernyavskaya, S. N. Erofeeva
{"title":"Assessment of vascular age and cardiovascular risk factors among young women in the Moscow region","authors":"T. Chernyavskaya, S. N. Erofeeva","doi":"10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess vascular age (VA) and the main cardiovascular risk factors (chronological age, body mass index (BMI), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), blood pressure (BP)) in women in the Moscow region.Material and methods. We assessed BP levels, BMI, PWV, and also calculate vascular age for women participating in the forum. BMI was calculated using the Quetelet index as weight divided by height squared (BMI=kg/m2). BP levels were measured in a sitting position three times on both arms, with the highest result recorded. PWV and vascular age were calculated using AngioScan01. The association between anthropometric measures, vascular stiffness, and VA differences was examined using multivariate linear regression, adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Intergroup (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and ≥140 mm Hg) comparisons of PWV and VA difference from actual were performed using a modified Welch's t-test.Results. The study involved 260 women. The mean age was 44,92±0,85 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 43,27-46,57), mean vascular age — 45,90±1,01 (95% CI 43,91-47,89), mean BMI — 23,383±0,66 kg/m2 (95% CI 22,046-24,720). Mean systolic BP was 127,63±1,89 mm Hg (95% CI 123,89-131,36), diastolic BP 80,031±0,93 (95% CI 78,20-81,86), mean PWV was 11,38±0,16 m/sec (95% CI 11,05-11,70). Analysis of the VA difference between women with BMI <25 kg/m2 (BMI1, n=93) and ≥25 kg/m2 (BMI2, n=67) revealed a significant difference in the calculated VA values (p=0,0002) between groups.Conclusion. Modern young women have high rates of vascular stiffness, which may determine the increase in morbidity and mortality rates in the working-age female population. The VA indicator predicts cardiovascular events and can be considered as an effective screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk, which is especially important for young patients.","PeriodicalId":21389,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"41 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2024-5806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To assess vascular age (VA) and the main cardiovascular risk factors (chronological age, body mass index (BMI), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), blood pressure (BP)) in women in the Moscow region.Material and methods. We assessed BP levels, BMI, PWV, and also calculate vascular age for women participating in the forum. BMI was calculated using the Quetelet index as weight divided by height squared (BMI=kg/m2). BP levels were measured in a sitting position three times on both arms, with the highest result recorded. PWV and vascular age were calculated using AngioScan01. The association between anthropometric measures, vascular stiffness, and VA differences was examined using multivariate linear regression, adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Intergroup (systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and ≥140 mm Hg) comparisons of PWV and VA difference from actual were performed using a modified Welch's t-test.Results. The study involved 260 women. The mean age was 44,92±0,85 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 43,27-46,57), mean vascular age — 45,90±1,01 (95% CI 43,91-47,89), mean BMI — 23,383±0,66 kg/m2 (95% CI 22,046-24,720). Mean systolic BP was 127,63±1,89 mm Hg (95% CI 123,89-131,36), diastolic BP 80,031±0,93 (95% CI 78,20-81,86), mean PWV was 11,38±0,16 m/sec (95% CI 11,05-11,70). Analysis of the VA difference between women with BMI <25 kg/m2 (BMI1, n=93) and ≥25 kg/m2 (BMI2, n=67) revealed a significant difference in the calculated VA values (p=0,0002) between groups.Conclusion. Modern young women have high rates of vascular stiffness, which may determine the increase in morbidity and mortality rates in the working-age female population. The VA indicator predicts cardiovascular events and can be considered as an effective screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk, which is especially important for young patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估莫斯科地区年轻女性的血管年龄和心血管风险因素
目的评估莫斯科地区妇女的血管年龄(VA)和主要心血管风险因素(实际年龄、体重指数(BMI)、颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)、血压(BP))。我们对参加论坛的妇女的血压水平、体重指数、脉搏波速度进行了评估,并计算了血管年龄。体重指数采用 Quetelet 指数计算,即体重除以身高的平方(BMI=kg/m2)。在坐姿下测量双臂血压三次,记录最高结果。脉搏波速度和血管年龄使用 AngioScan01 进行计算。在对传统心血管风险因素进行调整后,采用多变量线性回归法对人体测量指标、血管僵硬度和 VA 差异之间的关系进行了研究。组间(收缩压<140毫米汞柱和≥140毫米汞柱)脉搏波速度和VA与实际差异的比较采用改良韦尔奇t检验法进行。研究涉及 260 名女性。平均年龄为(44.92±0.85)岁(95% 置信区间(CI)为 43.27-46.57),平均血管年龄为(45.90±1.01)岁(95% 置信区间(CI)为 43.91-47.89),平均体重指数为(23.383±0.66)千克/平方米(95% 置信区间(CI)为 22.046-24.720)。平均收缩压为 127,63±1,89 毫米汞柱(95% CI 123,89-131,36),舒张压为 80,031±0,93 (95% CI 78,20-81,86),平均脉搏波速度为 11,38±0,16 米/秒(95% CI 11,05-11,70)。对体重指数<25 千克/平方米(BMI1,n=93)和≥25 千克/平方米(BMI2,n=67)的女性之间的脉搏波速度差异进行分析后发现,各组之间的脉搏波速度计算值存在显著差异(P=0,0002)。现代年轻女性的血管僵化率很高,这可能决定了工作年龄女性发病率和死亡率的上升。VA指标可预测心血管事件,可被视为评估心血管风险的有效筛查方法,这对年轻患者尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Russian Journal of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Cardiology has been issued since 1996. The language of this publication is Russian, with tables of contents and abstracts of all articles presented in English as well. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Eugene V.Shlyakhto, President of the Russian Society of Cardiology. The aim of the journal is both scientific and practical, also with referring to organizing matters of the Society. The best of all cardiologic research in Russia is submitted to the Journal. Moreover, it contains useful tips and clinical examples for practicing cardiologists. Journal is peer-reviewed, with multi-stage editing. The editorial board is presented by the leading cardiologists from different cities of Russia.
期刊最新文献
Mature neutrophils as a marker of hypoechoic carotid plaques and a predictor of polyvascular disease progression Oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease Myocardial infarction in persons aged ≥75 years: factors influencing inhospital mortality Comparative analysis of two multitask approaches to cognitive training in cardiac surgery patients Use of antiplatelet agents in patients after myocardial infarction followed up in Moscow outpatient clinics. Results of a non-interventional prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1