Agent-based Model of Initial Token Allocations: Simulating Distributions post Fair Launch

IF 2.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1145/3649318
Joaquin Delgado Fernandez, Tom Josua Barbereau, Orestis Papageorgiou
{"title":"Agent-based Model of Initial Token Allocations: Simulating Distributions post Fair Launch","authors":"Joaquin Delgado Fernandez, Tom Josua Barbereau, Orestis Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1145/3649318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With advancements in distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts, tokenized voting rights gained prominence within Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Voting rights tokens (aka. governance tokens) are fungible tokens that grant individual holders the right to vote upon the fate of a project. The motivation behind these tokens is to achieve decentral control within a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Because the initial allocations of these tokens is often un-democratic, the DeFi project and DAO of Yearn Finance experimented with a fair launch allocation where no tokens are pre-mined and all participants have an equal opportunity to receive them. Regardless, research on voting rights tokens highlights the formation of timocracies over time. The consideration is that the tokens’ tradability is the cause of concentration. To examine this proposition, this paper uses an agent-based model to simulate and analyze the concentration of voting rights tokens post three fair launch allocation scenarios under different trading modalities. The results show that regardless of the allocation, concentration persistently occurs. It confirms the consideration that the ‘disease’ is endogenous: the cause of concentration is the tokens’ tradablility. The findings inform theoretical understandings and practical implications for on-chain governance mediated by tokens.","PeriodicalId":45274,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3649318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With advancements in distributed ledger technologies and smart contracts, tokenized voting rights gained prominence within Decentralized Finance (DeFi). Voting rights tokens (aka. governance tokens) are fungible tokens that grant individual holders the right to vote upon the fate of a project. The motivation behind these tokens is to achieve decentral control within a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). Because the initial allocations of these tokens is often un-democratic, the DeFi project and DAO of Yearn Finance experimented with a fair launch allocation where no tokens are pre-mined and all participants have an equal opportunity to receive them. Regardless, research on voting rights tokens highlights the formation of timocracies over time. The consideration is that the tokens’ tradability is the cause of concentration. To examine this proposition, this paper uses an agent-based model to simulate and analyze the concentration of voting rights tokens post three fair launch allocation scenarios under different trading modalities. The results show that regardless of the allocation, concentration persistently occurs. It confirms the consideration that the ‘disease’ is endogenous: the cause of concentration is the tokens’ tradablility. The findings inform theoretical understandings and practical implications for on-chain governance mediated by tokens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于代理的初始代币分配模型:模拟公平启动后的分配
随着分布式账本技术和智能合约的发展,代币化投票权在去中心化金融(DeFi)领域获得了突出地位。投票权代币(又称治理代币)是可替代代币,赋予个人持有者对项目命运进行投票的权利。这些代币背后的动机是在去中心化自治组织(DAO)内实现去中心化控制。由于这些代币的初始分配往往是不民主的,DeFi 项目和 Yearn Finance 的 DAO 尝试了一种公平的启动分配,即不预先挖掘代币,所有参与者都有平等的机会获得代币。无论如何,关于投票权代币的研究强调了随着时间推移形成的时间型政体。考虑因素是代币的可交易性是集中的原因。为了研究这一命题,本文使用基于代理的模型模拟和分析了不同交易模式下三种公平发射分配方案后投票权代币的集中情况。结果表明,无论采用哪种分配方式,集中都会持续发生。这证实了 "疾病 "是内生性的这一观点:集中的原因在于代币的可交易性。研究结果为以代币为媒介的链上治理提供了理论认识和实践启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Interpretable Predictive Models for Healthcare via Rational Multi-Layer Perceptrons Mining Multimorbidity Trajectories and Co-Medication Effects from Patient Data to Predict Post–Hip Fracture Outcomes ShennongMGS: An LLM-based Chinese Medication Guidance System Co-occurrence order-preserving pattern mining with keypoint alignment for time series Estimating Future Financial Development of Urban Areas for Deploying Bank Branches: A Local-Regional Interpretable Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1