Fluid-mineral Equilibrium Under Nonhydrostatic Stress: Insight From Molecular Dynamics

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Journal of Science Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI:10.2475/001c.92881
M. Mazzucchelli, E. Moulas, B. Kaus, Thomas Speck
{"title":"Fluid-mineral Equilibrium Under Nonhydrostatic Stress: Insight From Molecular Dynamics","authors":"M. Mazzucchelli, E. Moulas, B. Kaus, Thomas Speck","doi":"10.2475/001c.92881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interpretation of phase equilibria and reactions in geological materials is based on standard thermodynamics that assumes hydrostatic and homogeneous stress conditions. However, rocks and minerals in the lithosphere can support stress gradients and nonhydrostatic stresses. Currently, there is still not an accepted macroscopic thermodynamic theory to include the effect of nonhydrostatic stress on mineral reactions, and the use of several thermodynamic potentials in stressed geological system remains under debate. In experiments under nonhydrostatic stress, it is often difficult to resolve the direct effect of differential stress on phase equilibria because pressure gradients may be developed. Such gradients can affect the metamorphic equilibria at the local scale. Here, we investigate the direct effect of a homogeneous, nonhydrostatic stress field on the solid-fluid equilibrium using molecular dynamics simulations at non-zero pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Our results show that, for simple single-component systems at constant temperature, the equilibrium fluid pressure of a stressed system is always larger than the value of fluid pressure at hydrostatic stress conditions. The displacement of the equilibrium value of the fluid pressure is about an order of magnitude smaller compared to the level of differential stress in the solid crystal. Thus, phase equilibria can be accurately predicted by taking the fluid pressure as a proxy of the equilibration pressure. On the contrary, the mean stress of the solid can deviate substantially from the pressure of the fluid in stressed systems at thermodynamic equilibrium. This has implications on the use of thermodynamic pressure in geodynamic models since the fluid pressure is a more accurate proxy for predicting the location of metamorphic reactions, while the equilibrium density of the solid has to be determined from its mean stress.","PeriodicalId":7660,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.92881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of phase equilibria and reactions in geological materials is based on standard thermodynamics that assumes hydrostatic and homogeneous stress conditions. However, rocks and minerals in the lithosphere can support stress gradients and nonhydrostatic stresses. Currently, there is still not an accepted macroscopic thermodynamic theory to include the effect of nonhydrostatic stress on mineral reactions, and the use of several thermodynamic potentials in stressed geological system remains under debate. In experiments under nonhydrostatic stress, it is often difficult to resolve the direct effect of differential stress on phase equilibria because pressure gradients may be developed. Such gradients can affect the metamorphic equilibria at the local scale. Here, we investigate the direct effect of a homogeneous, nonhydrostatic stress field on the solid-fluid equilibrium using molecular dynamics simulations at non-zero pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Our results show that, for simple single-component systems at constant temperature, the equilibrium fluid pressure of a stressed system is always larger than the value of fluid pressure at hydrostatic stress conditions. The displacement of the equilibrium value of the fluid pressure is about an order of magnitude smaller compared to the level of differential stress in the solid crystal. Thus, phase equilibria can be accurately predicted by taking the fluid pressure as a proxy of the equilibration pressure. On the contrary, the mean stress of the solid can deviate substantially from the pressure of the fluid in stressed systems at thermodynamic equilibrium. This has implications on the use of thermodynamic pressure in geodynamic models since the fluid pressure is a more accurate proxy for predicting the location of metamorphic reactions, while the equilibrium density of the solid has to be determined from its mean stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非静水压力下的流体-矿物质平衡:分子动力学的启示
对地质材料中的相平衡和反应的解释是以标准热力学为基础的,而标准热力学假定的是静水和均质应力条件。然而,岩石圈中的岩石和矿物可以承受应力梯度和非静水压力。目前,还没有一个公认的宏观热力学理论来包括非静水压力对矿物反应的影响,而且在受压地质系统中使用几种热力学势的问题仍有争议。在非静水压力下进行的实验中,由于可能会产生压力梯度,因此往往难以解决差应力对相平衡的直接影响。这种梯度会影响局部尺度的变质平衡。在此,我们利用分子动力学模拟研究了非零压力和高温条件下均质、非静水压力场对固液平衡的直接影响。我们的结果表明,对于恒温下的简单单组分系统,受压系统的平衡流体压力总是大于静水压力条件下的流体压力值。与固体晶体中的差应力水平相比,流体压力平衡值的位移大约小一个数量级。因此,以流体压力作为平衡压力的代表,可以准确预测相平衡。相反,在处于热力学平衡状态的受压系统中,固体的平均应力可能与流体的压力有很大偏差。这对在地球动力学模型中使用热力学压力产生了影响,因为流体压力是预测变质反应位置的更准确的替代物,而固体的平衡密度则必须根据其平均应力来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Science
American Journal of Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Science (AJS), founded in 1818 by Benjamin Silliman, is the oldest scientific journal in the United States that has been published continuously. The Journal is devoted to geology and related sciences and publishes articles from around the world presenting results of major research from all earth sciences. Readers are primarily earth scientists in academia and government institutions.
期刊最新文献
The Rare Earth Element Distribution in Marine Carbonates as a Potential Proxy for Seawater pH on Early Earth Late Cretaceous Uplift of Grand Canyon: Evidence From Fluid Inclusions The Carbon Isotopic Composition of Archean Kerogen and Its Resilience Through the Rock Cycle Abundant 2480 Ma Detrital Zircons in ∼1740 Ma Vishnu Schist in Northwestern Arizona: Derivation From the Matachewan Large Igneous Province? Cenozoic Basin Evolution During Alternating Extension and Shortening in the Southern Central Andes Along the Chile-Argentina Border, 37–38°S
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1