{"title":"Fluid-mineral Equilibrium Under Nonhydrostatic Stress: Insight From Molecular Dynamics","authors":"M. Mazzucchelli, E. Moulas, B. Kaus, Thomas Speck","doi":"10.2475/001c.92881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interpretation of phase equilibria and reactions in geological materials is based on standard thermodynamics that assumes hydrostatic and homogeneous stress conditions. However, rocks and minerals in the lithosphere can support stress gradients and nonhydrostatic stresses. Currently, there is still not an accepted macroscopic thermodynamic theory to include the effect of nonhydrostatic stress on mineral reactions, and the use of several thermodynamic potentials in stressed geological system remains under debate. In experiments under nonhydrostatic stress, it is often difficult to resolve the direct effect of differential stress on phase equilibria because pressure gradients may be developed. Such gradients can affect the metamorphic equilibria at the local scale. Here, we investigate the direct effect of a homogeneous, nonhydrostatic stress field on the solid-fluid equilibrium using molecular dynamics simulations at non-zero pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Our results show that, for simple single-component systems at constant temperature, the equilibrium fluid pressure of a stressed system is always larger than the value of fluid pressure at hydrostatic stress conditions. The displacement of the equilibrium value of the fluid pressure is about an order of magnitude smaller compared to the level of differential stress in the solid crystal. Thus, phase equilibria can be accurately predicted by taking the fluid pressure as a proxy of the equilibration pressure. On the contrary, the mean stress of the solid can deviate substantially from the pressure of the fluid in stressed systems at thermodynamic equilibrium. This has implications on the use of thermodynamic pressure in geodynamic models since the fluid pressure is a more accurate proxy for predicting the location of metamorphic reactions, while the equilibrium density of the solid has to be determined from its mean stress.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.92881","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The interpretation of phase equilibria and reactions in geological materials is based on standard thermodynamics that assumes hydrostatic and homogeneous stress conditions. However, rocks and minerals in the lithosphere can support stress gradients and nonhydrostatic stresses. Currently, there is still not an accepted macroscopic thermodynamic theory to include the effect of nonhydrostatic stress on mineral reactions, and the use of several thermodynamic potentials in stressed geological system remains under debate. In experiments under nonhydrostatic stress, it is often difficult to resolve the direct effect of differential stress on phase equilibria because pressure gradients may be developed. Such gradients can affect the metamorphic equilibria at the local scale. Here, we investigate the direct effect of a homogeneous, nonhydrostatic stress field on the solid-fluid equilibrium using molecular dynamics simulations at non-zero pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Our results show that, for simple single-component systems at constant temperature, the equilibrium fluid pressure of a stressed system is always larger than the value of fluid pressure at hydrostatic stress conditions. The displacement of the equilibrium value of the fluid pressure is about an order of magnitude smaller compared to the level of differential stress in the solid crystal. Thus, phase equilibria can be accurately predicted by taking the fluid pressure as a proxy of the equilibration pressure. On the contrary, the mean stress of the solid can deviate substantially from the pressure of the fluid in stressed systems at thermodynamic equilibrium. This has implications on the use of thermodynamic pressure in geodynamic models since the fluid pressure is a more accurate proxy for predicting the location of metamorphic reactions, while the equilibrium density of the solid has to be determined from its mean stress.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.