Feeding time(s): Patient urgence and the careful temporalities of antimicrobial resistance

G. Enticott, Kieran O’Mahony
{"title":"Feeding time(s): Patient urgence and the careful temporalities of antimicrobial resistance","authors":"G. Enticott, Kieran O’Mahony","doi":"10.1177/25148486241231205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to understand how caring for new-born livestock is made possible, which practices of care are privileged and to what effect? These aims are situated in attempts to promote the prudent use of antibiotics amongst livestock farmers to prevent antimicrobial resistance. In focusing on the rearing of new-born calves on dairy and beef farms in England and Wales, the paper reveals how care is configured by different temporal orders, the tensions between different temporalities of care, the reasons for them and the strategies employed by calf rearers to manage these tensions. Drawing on the concept of the ‘timescape’, the paper shows how calf care temporalities are relationally enacted and configured by materials, infrastructures and technologies. Common (productivist) agricultural temporalities of care emphasise speed, urgency and efficiency. However, by analysing the practice of feeding colostrum and ‘tubing’ – the forced feeding of calves via a tube inserted into the oesophagus – we highlight how these rapid caring temporalities conflict with the slower, patient skills of calf rearing. At the same time, however, we show how care is rendered fluid as calf rearers find ways of accommodating seemingly discordant temporalities – what we call ‘patient urgence’ – allowing different temporalities to co-exist within agricultural timescapes. Nevertheless, we show how these practices of accommodation are themselves the result of a productivist temporal order that marginalises calves and calf rearers. We argue that these timescapes point to the need for broader structural and cultural changes within agriculture to reduce the use of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":507916,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486241231205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to understand how caring for new-born livestock is made possible, which practices of care are privileged and to what effect? These aims are situated in attempts to promote the prudent use of antibiotics amongst livestock farmers to prevent antimicrobial resistance. In focusing on the rearing of new-born calves on dairy and beef farms in England and Wales, the paper reveals how care is configured by different temporal orders, the tensions between different temporalities of care, the reasons for them and the strategies employed by calf rearers to manage these tensions. Drawing on the concept of the ‘timescape’, the paper shows how calf care temporalities are relationally enacted and configured by materials, infrastructures and technologies. Common (productivist) agricultural temporalities of care emphasise speed, urgency and efficiency. However, by analysing the practice of feeding colostrum and ‘tubing’ – the forced feeding of calves via a tube inserted into the oesophagus – we highlight how these rapid caring temporalities conflict with the slower, patient skills of calf rearing. At the same time, however, we show how care is rendered fluid as calf rearers find ways of accommodating seemingly discordant temporalities – what we call ‘patient urgence’ – allowing different temporalities to co-exist within agricultural timescapes. Nevertheless, we show how these practices of accommodation are themselves the result of a productivist temporal order that marginalises calves and calf rearers. We argue that these timescapes point to the need for broader structural and cultural changes within agriculture to reduce the use of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喂食时间:病人的紧迫性和抗菌药耐药性的时间性
本文旨在了解新生牲畜的护理是如何实现的,哪些护理方式受到青睐,效果如何?这些目的都是为了促进畜牧业者谨慎使用抗生素,以防止抗菌素耐药性。通过重点研究英格兰和威尔士奶牛场和牛肉农场新生小牛的饲养情况,本文揭示了不同时间秩序下的照料方式、照料的不同时间性之间的紧张关系、产生这些紧张关系的原因以及小牛饲养者管理这些紧张关系的策略。本文借鉴 "时间景观 "的概念,展示了犊牛照料的时间性是如何通过材料、基础设施和技术形成和配置的。常见的(生产主义)农业照料时间强调速度、紧迫性和效率。然而,通过分析喂食牛初乳和 "插管"--通过插入食道的管子强制喂食小牛--的做法,我们强调了这些快速护理时间性如何与缓慢、耐心的小牛饲养技能相冲突。但同时,我们也展示了饲养犊牛的人是如何找到方法来适应看似不和谐的时间性--我们称之为 "病人的紧迫性"--从而使不同的时间性在农业时间景观中共存,从而使照料变得流畅。尽管如此,我们还是要说明,这些包容的做法本身是生产主义时间秩序的结果,而这种生产主义时间秩序将小牛和小牛饲养者边缘化。我们认为,这些时间景观表明,需要在农业内部进行更广泛的结构和文化变革,以减少抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reindeer, rockets and space infrastructures: Enacting oligoptic-satellitarian environments in Northern Sweden Uncertainty talk for bio-digital technologies: Expert conceptions of uncertainties in genomic selection for forestry Accessible nature: Balancing contradiction in protected areas Ecology of grief: Climatic events and disasters in the Himalaya Against the promethean: Energy throughput and the far-right politics of degrowth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1