Diversity in genetic risk of recurrent stroke: a genome-wide association study meta-analysis

Chad M. Aldridge, N. Armstrong, N. A. Sunmonu, Christopher Becker, Deepak Palakshappa, Arne G Lindgren, A. Pedersen, T. Stanne, C. Jern, J. Maguire, Fang-Chi Hsu, Keith L. Keene, Michèle Sale, M. Irvin, B. Worrall
{"title":"Diversity in genetic risk of recurrent stroke: a genome-wide association study meta-analysis","authors":"Chad M. Aldridge, N. Armstrong, N. A. Sunmonu, Christopher Becker, Deepak Palakshappa, Arne G Lindgren, A. Pedersen, T. Stanne, C. Jern, J. Maguire, Fang-Chi Hsu, Keith L. Keene, Michèle Sale, M. Irvin, B. Worrall","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2024.1338636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Recurrent strokes are seven times more lethal than initial ones, with 54% leading to long-term disability. Substantial recurrent stroke risk disparities exist among ancestral groups. Notably, Africans face double the risk and higher fatality rates compared to Europeans. Although genetic studies, particularly GWAS, hold promise for uncovering biological insights into recurrent stroke, they remain underexplored. Our study addresses this gap through meta-analyses of recurrent stroke GWAS, considering specific ancestral groups and a combined approach.We utilized four independent study cohorts for African, European, and Combined ancestry recurrent stroke GWAS with genotyping, imputation, and strict quality control. We harmonized recurrent stroke phenotype and effect allele estimates across cohorts. The logistic regression GWAS model was adjusted for age, sex, and principal components. We assessed how well genetic risk of stroke informs recurrent stroke risk using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the GIGASTROKE Consortium's polygenic risk scores (PRS).Harmonization included 4,420 participants (818 African ancestry and 3,602 European ancestry) with a recurrent stroke rate of 16.8% [median age 66.9 (59.1, 73.6) years; 56.2% male]. We failed to find genome-wide significant variants (p < 5e−8). However, we found 18 distinct suggestive (p < 5e−6) genetic loci with high biological relevance consistent across African and European ancestries, including PPARGC1B, CCDC3, OPRL1, and MYH11 genes. These genes affect vascular stenosis through constriction and dilation. We also observed an association with SDK1 gene, which has been previous linked with hypertension in Nigerian and Japanese populations). ROC analysis showed poor performance of the ischemic stroke PRS in discriminating recurrent stroke status (area under the curve = 0.48).Our study revealed genetic associations with recurrent stroke not previously associated with incident ischemic stroke. We found suggestive associations in genes previously linked with hypertension. We also determined that knowing the genetic risk of incident stroke does currently not inform recurrent stroke risk. We urgently need more studies to understand better the overlap or lack thereof between incident and recurrent stroke biology.","PeriodicalId":73108,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2024.1338636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Recurrent strokes are seven times more lethal than initial ones, with 54% leading to long-term disability. Substantial recurrent stroke risk disparities exist among ancestral groups. Notably, Africans face double the risk and higher fatality rates compared to Europeans. Although genetic studies, particularly GWAS, hold promise for uncovering biological insights into recurrent stroke, they remain underexplored. Our study addresses this gap through meta-analyses of recurrent stroke GWAS, considering specific ancestral groups and a combined approach.We utilized four independent study cohorts for African, European, and Combined ancestry recurrent stroke GWAS with genotyping, imputation, and strict quality control. We harmonized recurrent stroke phenotype and effect allele estimates across cohorts. The logistic regression GWAS model was adjusted for age, sex, and principal components. We assessed how well genetic risk of stroke informs recurrent stroke risk using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the GIGASTROKE Consortium's polygenic risk scores (PRS).Harmonization included 4,420 participants (818 African ancestry and 3,602 European ancestry) with a recurrent stroke rate of 16.8% [median age 66.9 (59.1, 73.6) years; 56.2% male]. We failed to find genome-wide significant variants (p < 5e−8). However, we found 18 distinct suggestive (p < 5e−6) genetic loci with high biological relevance consistent across African and European ancestries, including PPARGC1B, CCDC3, OPRL1, and MYH11 genes. These genes affect vascular stenosis through constriction and dilation. We also observed an association with SDK1 gene, which has been previous linked with hypertension in Nigerian and Japanese populations). ROC analysis showed poor performance of the ischemic stroke PRS in discriminating recurrent stroke status (area under the curve = 0.48).Our study revealed genetic associations with recurrent stroke not previously associated with incident ischemic stroke. We found suggestive associations in genes previously linked with hypertension. We also determined that knowing the genetic risk of incident stroke does currently not inform recurrent stroke risk. We urgently need more studies to understand better the overlap or lack thereof between incident and recurrent stroke biology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发性中风遗传风险的多样性:全基因组关联研究荟萃分析
中风是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。复发性中风的致死率是初次中风的七倍,其中 54% 会导致长期残疾。不同祖先群体之间存在巨大的复发性中风风险差异。值得注意的是,非洲人面临的风险是欧洲人的两倍,死亡率也更高。尽管基因研究,尤其是全球基因组研究,有望揭示复发性中风的生物学原理,但这些研究仍未得到充分探索。我们的研究通过对复发性中风 GWAS 进行荟萃分析、考虑特定祖先群体和综合方法来填补这一空白。我们利用四个独立的研究队列对非洲、欧洲和综合祖先复发性中风 GWAS 进行了基因分型、归因和严格的质量控制。我们统一了各队列的复发性中风表型和效应等位基因估计值。逻辑回归 GWAS 模型根据年龄、性别和主成分进行了调整。我们使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析和 GIGASTROKE 联合会的多基因风险评分(PRS)评估了中风遗传风险对复发性中风风险的影响程度。我们未能发现具有全基因组意义的变异(p < 5e-8)。但是,我们发现了 18 个不同的提示性基因位点(p < 5e-6),这些基因位点具有高度的生物学相关性,在非洲和欧洲血统中具有一致性,包括 PPARGC1B、CCDC3、OPRL1 和 MYH11 基因。这些基因通过收缩和扩张影响血管狭窄。我们还观察到与 SDK1 基因的关联,该基因以前在尼日利亚和日本人群中与高血压有关联)。ROC 分析显示,缺血性中风 PRS 在判别复发性中风状态方面表现不佳(曲线下面积 = 0.48)。我们发现了以前与高血压相关的基因中的提示性关联。我们还发现,目前了解事件性中风的遗传风险并不能告知复发性中风的风险。我们迫切需要更多的研究,以更好地了解事件性中风和复发性中风生物学之间的重叠或缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The important role of community organizations in stroke recovery and reintegration The coproduction of a multilevel personal narrative intervention for people with aphasia in a community communication support group—A pilot study Is thrombolysis beneficial in elderly patients with minor ischemic stroke? Outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion and initial mild deficits The NLRP3 inflammasome in ischemic stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1