Quality control of Doppler spectra from a vertically pointing, S-band profiling radar

Susan L. Belak, R. Tanamachi, Matthew L. Asel, Grant Dennany, Abhiram Gnanasambandam, S. Frasier, Francesc Rocadenbosch
{"title":"Quality control of Doppler spectra from a vertically pointing, S-band profiling radar","authors":"Susan L. Belak, R. Tanamachi, Matthew L. Asel, Grant Dennany, Abhiram Gnanasambandam, S. Frasier, Francesc Rocadenbosch","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0099.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study describes a novel combination of methods to remove spurious spectral peaks, or “spurs,” from Doppler spectra produced by a vertically pointing, S-band radar. The University of Massachusetts S-band frequency-modulated, continuous-wave radar (UMass FMCW) was deployed to monitor the growth of the CBL over northern Alabama during the VORTEX–Southeast field campaign in 2016. The Doppler spectra contained spurs caused by high-voltage switching power supplies in the traveling wave tube amplifier. In the original data processing scheme for this radar, a median filtering method was used to eliminate most of the spurs, but the largest ones persisted, which significantly degraded the quality of derived radar moments (e.g., reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width) and hindered further analysis of these data (e.g., hydrometeor classification and boundary layer height tracking). Our technique for removing the spurs consists of three steps: (i) a Laplacian filter identifies and masks peaks in the spectra that are characteristic of the spurs in shape and amplitude, (ii) an in-painting method then fills in the masked area based on surrounding data, and (iii) the moments data (e.g., reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width) are then recomputed using a coherent power technique. This combination of techniques was more effective than the median filter at removing the largest spurs from the Doppler spectra, and preserved more of the underlying Doppler spectral structure of the scatterers. Performance of both the median-filter and the in-painting methods are assessed through statistical analysis of the spectral power differences. Downstream products, such as boundary layer height detection, are more easily derived from the recomputed moments.","PeriodicalId":507668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0099.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study describes a novel combination of methods to remove spurious spectral peaks, or “spurs,” from Doppler spectra produced by a vertically pointing, S-band radar. The University of Massachusetts S-band frequency-modulated, continuous-wave radar (UMass FMCW) was deployed to monitor the growth of the CBL over northern Alabama during the VORTEX–Southeast field campaign in 2016. The Doppler spectra contained spurs caused by high-voltage switching power supplies in the traveling wave tube amplifier. In the original data processing scheme for this radar, a median filtering method was used to eliminate most of the spurs, but the largest ones persisted, which significantly degraded the quality of derived radar moments (e.g., reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width) and hindered further analysis of these data (e.g., hydrometeor classification and boundary layer height tracking). Our technique for removing the spurs consists of three steps: (i) a Laplacian filter identifies and masks peaks in the spectra that are characteristic of the spurs in shape and amplitude, (ii) an in-painting method then fills in the masked area based on surrounding data, and (iii) the moments data (e.g., reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width) are then recomputed using a coherent power technique. This combination of techniques was more effective than the median filter at removing the largest spurs from the Doppler spectra, and preserved more of the underlying Doppler spectral structure of the scatterers. Performance of both the median-filter and the in-painting methods are assessed through statistical analysis of the spectral power differences. Downstream products, such as boundary layer height detection, are more easily derived from the recomputed moments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂直指向 S 波段剖面雷达多普勒频谱的质量控制
本研究介绍了一种新颖的方法组合,用于消除垂直指向 S 波段雷达产生的多普勒频谱中的杂散频谱峰或 "尖峰"。马萨诸塞大学 S 波段频率调制连续波雷达(UMass FMCW)被部署在 2016 年 VORTEX-Southeast 野外作业期间,以监测阿拉巴马州北部上空 CBL 的增长情况。多普勒频谱包含由行波管放大器中的高压开关电源引起的尖峰。在该雷达最初的数据处理方案中,使用了中值滤波方法来消除大部分的尖峰,但最大的尖峰仍然存在,这大大降低了得出的雷达时刻(如反射率、多普勒速度和频谱宽度)的质量,并阻碍了对这些数据的进一步分析(如水文气象分类和边界层高度跟踪)。我们的去刺技术包括三个步骤:(i)拉普拉斯滤波器识别并屏蔽频谱中的峰值,这些峰值在形状和振幅上都是尖峰的特征;(ii)然后根据周围的数据,用内绘法填充屏蔽区域;(iii)然后使用相干功率技术重新计算时刻数据(如反射率、多普勒速度和频谱宽度)。与中值滤波器相比,这种技术组合能更有效地去除多普勒频谱中最大的尖峰,并保留更多散射体的基本多普勒频谱结构。通过对频谱功率差异的统计分析,评估了中值滤波法和内绘法的性能。下游产品,如边界层高度检测,更容易从重新计算的矩中得出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Quality Control Method of Surface Temperature Observations for Complex Physical Geography Estimates of Baroclinic Tidal Sea Level and Currents from Lagrangian Drifters and Satellite Altimetry Reconstruction of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness and Its Impact on Sea Ice Forecasting in the Melting Season Continuous peak period estimates from discrete surface-wave spectra Eddy detection inverted from Argo profiles to surface altimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1