Parental use of routines, setting limits, and child screen use during COVID-19: findings from a large Canadian cohort study

Amanda Lien, Xuedi Li, C. Keown‐Stoneman, K. Cost, Leigh Vanderloo, S. Carsley, Jonathon Maguire, C. Birken
{"title":"Parental use of routines, setting limits, and child screen use during COVID-19: findings from a large Canadian cohort study","authors":"Amanda Lien, Xuedi Li, C. Keown‐Stoneman, K. Cost, Leigh Vanderloo, S. Carsley, Jonathon Maguire, C. Birken","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2024.1293404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increase in child screen time has been observed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Home environment and parenting practices have been associated with child screen time. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between parental use of routines, limit setting, and child screen time during the (COVID-19) pandemic to inform harm-reducing strategies to limit the potential harms ensued by excessive screen use.A cohort study was conducted in 700 healthy children (3,628 observations) aged 0–11 years though the TARGet Kids! COVID-19 Study of Children and Families in Toronto, Canada from May 2020-May 2021. The independent variables assessed were parent-reported use of routines and setting limits. Outcomes were parent-reported child daily screen time in minutes and whether the Canadian 24-Hour screen time guideline was met, defined as 0 for <1 years, 60 or less for 1–5 years, and 120 or less for >5 years. Linear and logistic mixed-effects models were fitted using repeated measures of independent variables and outcomes with a priori stratification by developmental stages (<3, 3–4.99, ≥5 years).A total of 700 children with 3,628 observations were included in this study [mean age = 5.5 (SD = 2.7, max = 11.9) years, female = 47.6%]. Mean change in child screen time before vs. during the pandemic was +51.1 min/day and level of parental use of routines and setting limits remained stable. Lower use of routines was associated with higher child screen time (β = 4.0 min; 95% CI: 0.9, 7.1; p = 0.01) in ages ≥5 years and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline in ages <3 years and ≥5 years (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.88; p = 0.01; OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.87; p < 0.01). Lower use of limit setting was associated with higher child screen time and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline in ages ≥5 years (β = 3.8 min; 95% CI: 0.69, 6.48; p < 0.01; OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.94; p < 0.01).Lower parental use of routines and limits during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with higher screen time and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline among school-age children. Results may help inform strategies to promote healthy screen use in this age group.","PeriodicalId":502988,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1293404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increase in child screen time has been observed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Home environment and parenting practices have been associated with child screen time. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between parental use of routines, limit setting, and child screen time during the (COVID-19) pandemic to inform harm-reducing strategies to limit the potential harms ensued by excessive screen use.A cohort study was conducted in 700 healthy children (3,628 observations) aged 0–11 years though the TARGet Kids! COVID-19 Study of Children and Families in Toronto, Canada from May 2020-May 2021. The independent variables assessed were parent-reported use of routines and setting limits. Outcomes were parent-reported child daily screen time in minutes and whether the Canadian 24-Hour screen time guideline was met, defined as 0 for <1 years, 60 or less for 1–5 years, and 120 or less for >5 years. Linear and logistic mixed-effects models were fitted using repeated measures of independent variables and outcomes with a priori stratification by developmental stages (<3, 3–4.99, ≥5 years).A total of 700 children with 3,628 observations were included in this study [mean age = 5.5 (SD = 2.7, max = 11.9) years, female = 47.6%]. Mean change in child screen time before vs. during the pandemic was +51.1 min/day and level of parental use of routines and setting limits remained stable. Lower use of routines was associated with higher child screen time (β = 4.0 min; 95% CI: 0.9, 7.1; p = 0.01) in ages ≥5 years and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline in ages <3 years and ≥5 years (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.88; p = 0.01; OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.87; p < 0.01). Lower use of limit setting was associated with higher child screen time and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline in ages ≥5 years (β = 3.8 min; 95% CI: 0.69, 6.48; p < 0.01; OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.94; p < 0.01).Lower parental use of routines and limits during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with higher screen time and lower odds of meeting the screen time guideline among school-age children. Results may help inform strategies to promote healthy screen use in this age group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 期间父母使用常规、设置限制和儿童使用屏幕的情况:加拿大一项大型队列研究的结果
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,儿童使用屏幕的时间有所增加。家庭环境和养育方式与儿童的屏幕时间有关。本研究的目的是研究在 COVID-19 大流行期间,父母使用常规方法、设定限制和儿童使用屏幕时间之间的关联,从而为减少伤害的策略提供信息,以限制过度使用屏幕带来的潜在伤害!COVID-19 儿童和家庭研究》对 700 名 0-11 岁的健康儿童(3628 个观察值)进行了队列研究。评估的自变量是家长报告的常规和限制的使用情况。结果是家长报告的儿童每天屏幕时间(以分钟为单位)以及是否符合加拿大 24 小时屏幕时间指南(定义为 5 年为 0)。本研究共纳入了 700 名儿童,观察了 3628 次[平均年龄 = 5.5(SD = 2.7,最大 = 11.9)岁,女性 = 47.6%]。大流行前与大流行期间儿童屏幕时间的平均变化为+51.1分钟/天,而父母使用常规方法和设置限制的水平保持稳定。在年龄≥5 岁的儿童中,较少使用常规方法与较高的儿童屏幕时间相关(β = 4.0 分钟;95% CI:0.9,7.1;p = 0.01),而在年龄<3 岁和≥5 岁的儿童中,较低的屏幕时间达标几率与较高的儿童屏幕时间相关(OR = 0.59;95% CI:0.38,0.88;p = 0.01;OR = 0.76;95% CI:0.67,0.87;p <0.01)。在COVID-19大流行期间,父母较少使用常规和限制与学龄儿童较高的屏幕时间和较低的屏幕时间达标率有关。这些结果可能有助于为促进该年龄组儿童健康使用屏幕的策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Residential childcare worker perceptions of work-related achievement and pride Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, parental stress, and attachment styles How adverse childhood experiences impact the professional quality of life of residential care workers: resilience as a mediator for burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction Predictors of irritability in pediatric autistic populations: a scoping review Relational peer victimization and depression symptoms in young adults: longitudinal evidence from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1