Impact of Globalization and Digitalization on Social Movements and Collective Action Across Different Regions and Contexts in Nigeria

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY International Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.47604/ijs.2331
Ahmed Abdullahi
{"title":"Impact of Globalization and Digitalization on Social Movements and Collective Action Across Different Regions and Contexts in Nigeria","authors":"Ahmed Abdullahi","doi":"10.47604/ijs.2331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate impact of globalization and digitalization on social movements and collective action across different regions and contexts \nMethodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. \nFindings: Globalization and digitalization have profoundly affected social movements and collective action. They enable global connectivity, amplify marginalized voices, and give rise to diverse movements. However, challenges include government control, digital inequality, and the need for new tactics. Activists now use digital platforms to mobilize globally, but also face increased state repression. The digital age has led to innovative strategies and ongoing evolution of the global activist landscape. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Resource mobilization theory, network theory & transnational activism theory may be used to anchor future studies on impact of globalization and digitalization on social movements and collective action across different regions and contexts. Movements should prioritize digital literacy and security training for their members. Policymakers should address the digital divide by implementing policies and initiatives that ensure equitable access to digital resources, particularly in marginalized regions","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/ijs.2331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate impact of globalization and digitalization on social movements and collective action across different regions and contexts Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Globalization and digitalization have profoundly affected social movements and collective action. They enable global connectivity, amplify marginalized voices, and give rise to diverse movements. However, challenges include government control, digital inequality, and the need for new tactics. Activists now use digital platforms to mobilize globally, but also face increased state repression. The digital age has led to innovative strategies and ongoing evolution of the global activist landscape. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Resource mobilization theory, network theory & transnational activism theory may be used to anchor future studies on impact of globalization and digitalization on social movements and collective action across different regions and contexts. Movements should prioritize digital literacy and security training for their members. Policymakers should address the digital divide by implementing policies and initiatives that ensure equitable access to digital resources, particularly in marginalized regions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化和数字化对尼日利亚不同地区和背景下的社会运动和集体行动的影响
目的:本研究旨在调查全球化和数字化在不同地区和背景下对社会运动和集体行动的影响:本研究采用案头研究法。案头研究设计通常被称为二手数据收集。这主要是从现有资源中收集数据,因为与实地研究相比,它具有成本低的优势。我们目前的研究调查了已经出版的研究和报告,因为这些数据可以很容易地通过在线期刊和图书馆获取。研究结果全球化和数字化对社会运动和集体行动产生了深远影响。它们实现了全球互联互通,放大了边缘化的声音,并催生了多样化的运动。然而,面临的挑战包括政府控制、数字不平等以及对新策略的需求。现在,活动家们利用数字平台在全球范围内进行动员,但也面临着越来越多的国家压制。数字时代催生了创新战略,全球激进分子的格局也在不断演变。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:资源动员理论、网络理论和跨国激进主义理论可用于未来研究全球化和数字化对不同地区和背景下的社会运动和集体行动的影响。社会运动应优先考虑对其成员进行数字扫盲和安全培训。政策制定者应通过实施确保公平获取数字资源的政策和倡议来解决数字鸿沟问题,尤其是在边缘化地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Including Marine-Related Items in the ISSP Environment Module is Important for a More Holistic Measure of Public Environmental Perceptions When do Women Take the Lead? Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective Automated Futures, Altered Priorities: The Impact of Technological Change on Environmental Attitudes and Policies Using the Campbell Paradigm to Understand the Role of Institutional Trust in Environmental Policy Support Do “environmental losers” pay the price? The role of individual and country vulnerabilities in the relationship between environmental concern and willingness to pay to protect the environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1