Assessment of the accuracy of the method of fundamental parameters for XRF analysis of soil samples using an ARL Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software

E. I. Denisov, V. S. Semenishchev, M. V. Voitenko, D. V. Ryansky
{"title":"Assessment of the accuracy of the method of fundamental parameters for XRF analysis of soil samples using an ARL Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software","authors":"E. I. Denisov, V. S. Semenishchev, M. V. Voitenko, D. V. Ryansky","doi":"10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-19-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"X-ray fluorescent (XRF) analysis is one of the most widely used methods for analytical control of soil and rock samples, which allows determining a wide range of elements using a single sample with minimum costs. This work is aimed to expand the XRF capabilities in terms of obtaining calibration dependences for various types of samples. The work presents the results of the experimental assessment of the accuracy of the method of fundamental parameters for analysis of soil samples on a Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software using artificial samples. The suggested methodical approach has shown the potentiality of using a Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software for analysis of soil samples prepared by different methods (fused, pressed and bulk). The systematic deviation from the target value and a random error were estimated. For fused soil samples, deviations from the target value for most of the major components were (1.01) with a random error of 0.01 – 0.06. A Quant’X spectrometer with the UniQuant software allows determining light elements in fused samples with an error of up to 0.06. For the majority of impurity elements, a significant deviation was found, more than one (an underestimation of the determination results by an average of 1.18 times). This requires correction of the results obtained and the analysis error will be determined by values?? ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. In most cases, the deviation from the target value and the error of the element determination decreased as the sample preparation became more complex. After adjustment, bulk soil samples showed the highest error of the analysis results (from 0.1 to 0.2 for the major elements and 0.05 – 0.10 for impurity elements). The detection limits of some elements in fused soil samples were estimated. When the component content in the soil is more than 0.1%, the best option is to analyze fused samples. To determine concentration levels of about 50 ppm, it is proposed to measure pressed samples and take into account the increased error.","PeriodicalId":504498,"journal":{"name":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2024-90-2-19-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

X-ray fluorescent (XRF) analysis is one of the most widely used methods for analytical control of soil and rock samples, which allows determining a wide range of elements using a single sample with minimum costs. This work is aimed to expand the XRF capabilities in terms of obtaining calibration dependences for various types of samples. The work presents the results of the experimental assessment of the accuracy of the method of fundamental parameters for analysis of soil samples on a Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software using artificial samples. The suggested methodical approach has shown the potentiality of using a Quant’X energy dispersive spectrometer with the UniQuant software for analysis of soil samples prepared by different methods (fused, pressed and bulk). The systematic deviation from the target value and a random error were estimated. For fused soil samples, deviations from the target value for most of the major components were (1.01) with a random error of 0.01 – 0.06. A Quant’X spectrometer with the UniQuant software allows determining light elements in fused samples with an error of up to 0.06. For the majority of impurity elements, a significant deviation was found, more than one (an underestimation of the determination results by an average of 1.18 times). This requires correction of the results obtained and the analysis error will be determined by values?? ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. In most cases, the deviation from the target value and the error of the element determination decreased as the sample preparation became more complex. After adjustment, bulk soil samples showed the highest error of the analysis results (from 0.1 to 0.2 for the major elements and 0.05 – 0.10 for impurity elements). The detection limits of some elements in fused soil samples were estimated. When the component content in the soil is more than 0.1%, the best option is to analyze fused samples. To determine concentration levels of about 50 ppm, it is proposed to measure pressed samples and take into account the increased error.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估使用 ARL Quant'X 能量色散光谱仪和 UniQuant 软件对土壤样品进行 XRF 分析的基本参数方法的准确性
X 射线荧光(XRF)分析是土壤和岩石样本分析控制中使用最广泛的方法之一,它允许使用单一样本以最低成本测定多种元素。这项工作旨在扩展 XRF 的能力,以获得各类样品的校准相关性。该工作介绍了利用人工样品,在 Quant'X 能量色散光谱仪上使用 UniQuant 软件分析土壤样品的基本参数方法的准确性实验评估结果。建议的方法显示了使用带有 UniQuant 软件的 Quant'X 能量色散光谱仪分析不同方法制备的土壤样品(熔融、压制和散装)的潜力。对目标值的系统偏差和随机误差进行了估算。对于熔融土壤样品,大多数主要成分与目标值的偏差为(1.01),随机误差为 0.01 - 0.06。使用 Quant'X 光谱仪和 UniQuant 软件可以测定熔融样品中的轻元素,误差不超过 0.06。对于大多数杂质元素来说,偏差都很大,超过了 1(测定结果平均低估了 1.18 倍)。这就需要对所得结果进行修正,分析误差将根据 0.01 至 0.1 之间的数值来确定。在大多数情况下,随着样品制备的复杂化,与目标值的偏差和元素测定的误差都会减小。经过调整后,块状土壤样品的分析结果误差最大(主要元素的误差在 0.1 至 0.2 之间,杂质元素的误差在 0.05 至 0.10 之间)。对熔融土壤样品中某些元素的检测限进行了估算。当土壤中的成分含量超过 0.1%时,最佳选择是分析熔融样品。若要确定约 50 ppm 的浓度水平,建议测量压制样品,并考虑增加的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the effect of macrogeometry of rubbing steel bodies at their point contact on the tribological characteristics of lubricants under boundary lubrication conditions Study of the mechanical behavior and multiscale simulation of the crack propagation in a bilinga wooden beam Studying the estimates of gamma distribution parameters Analysis of the effect of the direction of reinforcement of a fibrous composite material on the inhomogeneity of localization of deformations and stresses using the method of thermoelastic response Study of the effect of static stresses on the hydrogen content and electrochemical characteristics of steels of different types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1