Bridging the gap between science deniers and voice of reason

Karolína Poliaková
{"title":"Bridging the gap between science deniers and voice of reason","authors":"Karolína Poliaková","doi":"10.22323/2.23010702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn the 2021 book “How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason”, Lee McIntyre introduces different anti-science movements and their reasoning. Based on personal interactions with committed science deniers and literature from various disciplines including cognitive psychology, he argues that all these communities use the same playbook in terms of reasoning about evidence, argumentation, demands on scientific certainty and recruitment of new members. Such observations allow McIntyre to propose a universal strategy to combat these beliefs by using respectful in-person engagement and effective science communication tools. His argument is rooted in the idea that anti-science beliefs are built on identities, not on the content of specific beliefs.","PeriodicalId":501088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Communication","volume":"7 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23010702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 2021 book “How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason”, Lee McIntyre introduces different anti-science movements and their reasoning. Based on personal interactions with committed science deniers and literature from various disciplines including cognitive psychology, he argues that all these communities use the same playbook in terms of reasoning about evidence, argumentation, demands on scientific certainty and recruitment of new members. Such observations allow McIntyre to propose a universal strategy to combat these beliefs by using respectful in-person engagement and effective science communication tools. His argument is rooted in the idea that anti-science beliefs are built on identities, not on the content of specific beliefs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合科学否定者与理性之声之间的鸿沟
在 2021 年出版的《如何与科学否认者交谈:李-麦金太尔(Lee McIntyre)在 2021 年出版的《如何与科学否认者对话:与扁平地球人、气候否认者和其他违背理性的人对话》一书中,介绍了不同的反科学运动及其推理。根据与坚定的科学否认者的个人互动以及包括认知心理学在内的各学科文献,他认为所有这些群体在证据推理、论证、对科学确定性的要求以及招募新成员等方面都使用相同的游戏规则。通过这些观察,麦金太尔提出了一种通用策略,即通过尊重他人的亲身参与和有效的科学交流工具来打击这些信念。他的论点根植于这样一种思想,即反科学信仰是建立在身份而非具体信仰内容的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizen science and science communication: toward a more inclusive pattern? #AISCICOMM24. Discussing the role of (generative) AI for science communication research and science communication practice International Symposium on Public Communication of Science and Technology in Zacatecas, Mexico: between diversity, inclusion and pending questions Science journalism in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: news sources engagement and [lack of] science accountability Exploring the behavioral mechanisms of Chinese scientists' public engagement with science based on an integrative model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1