A Comparative Evaluation of the Tensile Bond Strength of Cement-retained Restorations on Implant Abutments Subjected to Different Surface Treatments: An In vitro Study

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY Advances in Human Biology Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.4103/aihb.aihb_71_23
Amrita Jayaswal, Rashika Singh, Shitij Srivastava, Abhinav Shekhar, L. Bhatia
{"title":"A Comparative Evaluation of the Tensile Bond Strength of Cement-retained Restorations on Implant Abutments Subjected to Different Surface Treatments: An In vitro Study","authors":"Amrita Jayaswal, Rashika Singh, Shitij Srivastava, Abhinav Shekhar, L. Bhatia","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_71_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The longevity of cement-retained implant-supported restorations depends upon a strong and durable bond at the metal/cement interface. Various forms of surface treatments of implant abutments have been shown to enhance the retention of cement-retained restorations. The present study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the tensile bond strength of metal copings luted onto implant abutments subjected to different surface treatments and determine the most effective surface treatment for long-term retention.\n \n \n \n Forty acrylic blocks were prepared, each with an implant analogue placed vertically inside the block and straight abutments tightened optimally onto implant analogues. The samples were divided into four Groups (n = 10) according to surface treatment of implant abutments: Group A – no surface treatment, Group B – sandblasting, Group C – metal primer application and Group D – acid etching. Metal copings were luted onto implant abutments, and the tensile force necessary to debond each metal coping was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were summarised in Mean ± Standard deviation. Groups were compared by one factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test after ascertaining normality by Shapiro-Wilk’s test and homogeneity of variance between groups by Levene’s test. A two-tailed (α = 2) P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n \n \n \n The highest mean tensile bond strength was recorded for Group C (metal primer application), followed by Groups B, D and A, respectively.\n \n \n \n Amongst the surface treatments used in the study, metal primer application was found to be most effective in improving the retention of cement-retained prostheses.\n","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_71_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The longevity of cement-retained implant-supported restorations depends upon a strong and durable bond at the metal/cement interface. Various forms of surface treatments of implant abutments have been shown to enhance the retention of cement-retained restorations. The present study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the tensile bond strength of metal copings luted onto implant abutments subjected to different surface treatments and determine the most effective surface treatment for long-term retention. Forty acrylic blocks were prepared, each with an implant analogue placed vertically inside the block and straight abutments tightened optimally onto implant analogues. The samples were divided into four Groups (n = 10) according to surface treatment of implant abutments: Group A – no surface treatment, Group B – sandblasting, Group C – metal primer application and Group D – acid etching. Metal copings were luted onto implant abutments, and the tensile force necessary to debond each metal coping was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were summarised in Mean ± Standard deviation. Groups were compared by one factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test after ascertaining normality by Shapiro-Wilk’s test and homogeneity of variance between groups by Levene’s test. A two-tailed (α = 2) P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The highest mean tensile bond strength was recorded for Group C (metal primer application), followed by Groups B, D and A, respectively. Amongst the surface treatments used in the study, metal primer application was found to be most effective in improving the retention of cement-retained prostheses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同表面处理的种植体基台上的水泥固位修复体的拉伸粘结强度进行比较评估:体外研究
骨水泥固位的种植体支持修复体的寿命取决于金属/骨水泥界面上牢固持久的粘结力。事实证明,对种植基台进行各种形式的表面处理都能增强骨水泥固位修复体的固位力。本研究旨在比较评估经过不同表面处理的种植基台上金属基台的拉伸粘结强度,并确定对长期固位最有效的表面处理方法。 制备了 40 个丙烯酸块,每个块内垂直放置一个种植体模拟体,并将直基台以最佳方式紧固在种植体模拟体上。根据种植体基台表面处理的不同,样本被分为四组(n = 10):A 组--未进行表面处理,B 组--喷砂处理,C 组--涂抹金属底漆,D 组--酸蚀处理。在种植体基台上安装金属基台,使用万能试验机测量每个金属基台脱粘所需的拉力。数据以平均值 ± 标准偏差汇总。组间比较采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),组间均值差异的显著性采用 Tukey 的诚实显著差异事后检验,然后用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验确定正态性,用 Levene 检验确定组间方差的同质性。双尾(α = 2)P < 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。 C 组(使用金属底漆)的平均拉伸粘结强度最高,其次分别是 B 组、D 组和 A 组。 在研究中使用的各种表面处理方法中,使用金属底漆对提高水门汀修复体的固位效果最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Pazopanib on Primary Patient-derived Undifferentiated Malignant Round Cell Sarcoma Line Comparison of Practice and Knowledge on Endodontic Retreatment amongst the General Practitioners and Endodontists: A Survey The Pinhole Surgical Technique - A Distinct Approach for a Marginal Tissue Recession Coverage Using Amniotic Membrane Dental Erosive Wear Assessment amongst Different Age Groups Utilising Basic Erosive Wear Examination: An Epidemiological Study Assessment of Kinematic and Dynamic Characteristics of Shoulder Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1