Prospectives and drawbacks of ChatGPT in healthcare and clinical medicine

Khadija Alam, Akhil Kumar, F. N. U. Samiullah
{"title":"Prospectives and drawbacks of ChatGPT in healthcare and clinical medicine","authors":"Khadija Alam,&nbsp;Akhil Kumar,&nbsp;F. N. U. Samiullah","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00434-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT-3.5, a member of generative pre-training transformer (GPT) models created by artificial intelligence (AI), is an updated and finely tuned version of previously launched AI chatbots. It is trained on a large volume of text data available on the internet, can produce human-like responses to a range of prompts and inquiries, and interprets and conversationally creates text, making it suitable for participating in interactive human conversations on a range of topics. Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has gained quick popularity not only among the general population but also among healthcare workers and researchers in all fields owing to its versatile, potent, and reliable benefits regarding scientific writing and medical education. Consequently, many studies have been done on ChatGPT regarding scientific research and medical education that have greatly enlightened medical professionals about its efficient use and probable risks. However, its effectiveness in healthcare and clinical medicine is still being determined, given its criticism regarding the authenticity of its diagnostic decisions. This review aims to highlight its viable usage in clinical practice, such as virtual assistance and patient communication, and the potential associated drawbacks, including a lack of human judgment and interactivity, data quality, accountability, and transparency, the risk of overreliance, and medico-legal and ethical considerations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"767 - 773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00434-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large language model (LLM) ChatGPT-3.5, a member of generative pre-training transformer (GPT) models created by artificial intelligence (AI), is an updated and finely tuned version of previously launched AI chatbots. It is trained on a large volume of text data available on the internet, can produce human-like responses to a range of prompts and inquiries, and interprets and conversationally creates text, making it suitable for participating in interactive human conversations on a range of topics. Since its release in November 2022, ChatGPT has gained quick popularity not only among the general population but also among healthcare workers and researchers in all fields owing to its versatile, potent, and reliable benefits regarding scientific writing and medical education. Consequently, many studies have been done on ChatGPT regarding scientific research and medical education that have greatly enlightened medical professionals about its efficient use and probable risks. However, its effectiveness in healthcare and clinical medicine is still being determined, given its criticism regarding the authenticity of its diagnostic decisions. This review aims to highlight its viable usage in clinical practice, such as virtual assistance and patient communication, and the potential associated drawbacks, including a lack of human judgment and interactivity, data quality, accountability, and transparency, the risk of overreliance, and medico-legal and ethical considerations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 在医疗保健和临床医学中的前景和弊端
大型语言模型(LLM) ChatGPT-3.5是人工智能(AI)创建的生成式预训练转换器(GPT)模型的一员,是先前推出的AI聊天机器人的更新和微调版本。它在互联网上大量可用的文本数据上进行训练,可以对一系列提示和查询产生类似人类的响应,并且可以解释和对话地创建文本,使其适合参与关于一系列主题的交互式人类对话。自2022年11月发布以来,ChatGPT不仅在普通人群中,而且在所有领域的医疗工作者和研究人员中迅速流行起来,因为它在科学写作和医学教育方面具有多功能,强大和可靠的好处。因此,在科学研究和医学教育方面对ChatGPT进行了许多研究,使医疗专业人员对其有效使用和可能存在的风险有了很大的了解。然而,鉴于其诊断决定的真实性受到批评,其在医疗保健和临床医学中的有效性仍有待确定。本综述旨在强调其在临床实践中的可行应用,例如虚拟辅助和患者沟通,以及潜在的相关缺点,包括缺乏人类判断和交互性,数据质量,问责制和透明度,过度依赖的风险,以及医学法律和伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Against AI ethics: challenging the conventional narratives Legitimate expectations in the age of innovation Dehumanising education: AI and the capitalist capture of teaching An overview of AI ethics: moral concerns through the lens of principles, lived realities and power structures Justification optional: ChatGPT’s advice can still influence human judgments about moral dilemmas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1