Co‐production of agroecological innovations to improve sustainability in South American fruit farms

Fabiana Oliveira da Silva, Eduardo C. Arellano, Blandina Felipe Viana, Vinina Silva-Ferreira, P. Oliveira-Rebouças, Nadia Rojas-Arévalo, Andrés Muñoz‐Sáez, Valentina P. Jimenez, Natalia B. Zielonka, Liam P. Crowther, Lynn V. Dicks
{"title":"Co‐production of agroecological innovations to improve sustainability in South American fruit farms","authors":"Fabiana Oliveira da Silva, Eduardo C. Arellano, Blandina Felipe Viana, Vinina Silva-Ferreira, P. Oliveira-Rebouças, Nadia Rojas-Arévalo, Andrés Muñoz‐Sáez, Valentina P. Jimenez, Natalia B. Zielonka, Liam P. Crowther, Lynn V. Dicks","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nAgricultural intensification and expansion are the main drivers of biodiversity loss that continue to increase this century, especially in South America. International markets and global policy provide incentives and frameworks to address this, but these are unlikely to be effective unless farmers on the ground are enabled and motivated to respond to them by developing long‐term solutions that fit their production systems and local contexts.\n\nHere, we use a multi‐actor transdisciplinary approach to co‐design and test agroecological innovations suitable for intensive, exporting South American fruit farms. We focus on highly biodiverse regions experiencing habitat loss in the Mediterranean and dry tropical forest regions of Chile and Brazil, respectively. The innovations were designed to support local biodiversity without compromising productivity or quality.\n\nFourteen farmers participated throughout the project, covering a total of 4178 ha of intensive table grape, mango and cherry production. All were under pressure from buyers to report action on biodiversity.\n\nFarmers worked with researchers and industry representatives through an iterative process of dialogues and workshops to select, co‐design and implement three agroecological innovations: perches for birds of prey, cover crops and native hedgerows. Farmers became engaged in monitoring their effectiveness and redesigning them to suit local contexts.\n\nWe develop an extensive set of resources for ongoing dissemination, including an online sustainability metric to report the practices carried out. Eight farms continued to implement at least one agroecological innovation beyond the end of the project, motivated by its fit to their management system and their ability to report positive actions in their supply chains.\n\nPolicy implications. Our model of knowledge co‐production demonstrates how transdisciplinary research in agriculture, fully localised in a particular food‐producing context, can enable farmers in the global South to engage with biodiversity conservation in response to top‐down market signals incentivising sustainability. We argue that many top‐down effort to enhance the sustainability of food supply chains, whether through market incentives, voluntary codes or trade regulations, requires locally based knowledge co‐production, in which multiple stakeholders from agriculture and the food industry can benefit from working with locally based researchers.\n\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":508650,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":"828 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural intensification and expansion are the main drivers of biodiversity loss that continue to increase this century, especially in South America. International markets and global policy provide incentives and frameworks to address this, but these are unlikely to be effective unless farmers on the ground are enabled and motivated to respond to them by developing long‐term solutions that fit their production systems and local contexts. Here, we use a multi‐actor transdisciplinary approach to co‐design and test agroecological innovations suitable for intensive, exporting South American fruit farms. We focus on highly biodiverse regions experiencing habitat loss in the Mediterranean and dry tropical forest regions of Chile and Brazil, respectively. The innovations were designed to support local biodiversity without compromising productivity or quality. Fourteen farmers participated throughout the project, covering a total of 4178 ha of intensive table grape, mango and cherry production. All were under pressure from buyers to report action on biodiversity. Farmers worked with researchers and industry representatives through an iterative process of dialogues and workshops to select, co‐design and implement three agroecological innovations: perches for birds of prey, cover crops and native hedgerows. Farmers became engaged in monitoring their effectiveness and redesigning them to suit local contexts. We develop an extensive set of resources for ongoing dissemination, including an online sustainability metric to report the practices carried out. Eight farms continued to implement at least one agroecological innovation beyond the end of the project, motivated by its fit to their management system and their ability to report positive actions in their supply chains. Policy implications. Our model of knowledge co‐production demonstrates how transdisciplinary research in agriculture, fully localised in a particular food‐producing context, can enable farmers in the global South to engage with biodiversity conservation in response to top‐down market signals incentivising sustainability. We argue that many top‐down effort to enhance the sustainability of food supply chains, whether through market incentives, voluntary codes or trade regulations, requires locally based knowledge co‐production, in which multiple stakeholders from agriculture and the food industry can benefit from working with locally based researchers. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同进行农业生态创新,提高南美果园的可持续性
农业集约化和扩张是造成生物多样性丧失的主要原因,本世纪这种现象仍在加剧,尤其是在南美洲。国际市场和全球政策提供了解决这一问题的激励措施和框架,但除非当地农民有能力、有动力通过制定适合其生产系统和当地环境的长期解决方案来应对这些激励措施和框架,否则这些激励措施和框架不可能有效。在此,我们采用多方跨学科方法来共同设计和测试适合集约化出口南美水果农场的农业生态创新。我们将重点放在生物多样性高度丰富的地区,这些地区分别位于智利的地中海地区和巴西的干旱热带雨林地区,正在经历栖息地丧失。在整个项目中,共有 14 位农民参与了项目,涉及 4178 公顷的鲜食葡萄、芒果和樱桃集约化生产。农民们与研究人员和行业代表一起,通过对话和研讨会的反复过程,选择、共同设计并实施了三项农业生态创新:猎鸟栖息地、覆盖作物和本地树篱。我们开发了一套广泛的资源,用于持续传播,包括在线可持续性指标,以报告所实施的实践。八个农场在项目结束后继续实施至少一项生态农业创新,原因是创新符合他们的管理系统,而且他们能够报告供应链中的积极行动。我们的知识共同生产模式表明,在特定的粮食生产环境中充分本地化的农业跨学科研究如何能够使全球南方的农民参与生物多样性保护,以响应自上而下的激励可持续发展的市场信号。我们认为,无论是通过市场激励、自愿守则还是贸易法规,许多自上而下的努力都需要以本地为基础的知识共同生产,其中农业和食品行业的多个利益相关者可以从与本地研究人员的合作中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining socioecological reciprocity: Intentionality, mutualism or collateral effect Dynamic reciprocal contributions between Indigenous communities and cultural keystone species: A study case in Western Ecuador Cultural stewardship in urban spaces: Reviving Indigenous knowledge for the restoration of nature Communities in ecosystem restoration: The role of inclusive values and local elites' narrative innovations Reintroduced, but not accepted: Stakeholder perceptions of beavers in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1