Contextualizing Multilingual Learner Disproportionality in Special Education: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Melissa J. Cuba, Adai A. Tefera
{"title":"Contextualizing Multilingual Learner Disproportionality in Special Education: A Mixed-Methods Approach","authors":"Melissa J. Cuba, Adai A. Tefera","doi":"10.1177/01614681241233877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most complex and systemic challenges U.S. public schools face is the disproportionate identification of multilingual learners in special education. Currently, students with multidimensional identities are often trapped in ambiguous and contradictory education policies and practices that contribute to both under- and over-representation in special education. Given the legacy of racial discrimination in the United States and in Virginia due to its history, students who have multidimensional identities where social categories intersect and interact with power dynamics are more likely to have their needs and outcomes overlooked. For these reasons, this mixed-methods study, situated within a Virginia school district, built on extent disproportionality research by applying a multilevel model of intersectionality to understand the relationship between social categories (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status [SES]), practices, and policies and the disproportionate representation of multilingual learners in special education. We also examined the extent to which multilingual learners are disproportionately over- or under-represented in special education in Virginia, and how disproportionality varies by school level (i.e., grades K–5 for elementary, grades 6–12 for secondary), race/ethnicity, gender, and SES. The quantitative findings from phase one were used to focus on one school district to find out how eligibility processes and services are impacted by organizational structures and school and community contexts. Our results demonstrate disparities for multilingual learners with disabilities by race/ethnicity, gender, and SES. Quantitative findings from this study both support and refute what is known in the extant literature about outcomes related to grade level, race/ethnicity, gender, and SES of multilingual learners with disabilities. The qualitative results, however, illustrate how the larger sociopolitical landscape and perceptions of ability/disability shape eligibility processes and outcomes for these students. Our qualitative data provide insight into multilingual learner disproportionality and the role of context and educational practices that contribute to these types of disparities in special education. The implications of these results for future practice, policy, and research are discussed. Generally speaking, this mixed-methods study shows that (1) using intersectional framing in a risk analysis of multilingual learner disproportionality reveals disparities a one-dimensional approach obscures, (2) representation in special education is associated with a multilingual learner’s social categories (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, SES), and (3) contextual factors impact how multilingual learner eligibility policies and practices are communicated and implemented within schools. The fact that multilingual learner identification with a disability is correlated with social categories suggests that how we address learning challenges may reflect social problems rather than issues related to learning.","PeriodicalId":508365,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241233877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most complex and systemic challenges U.S. public schools face is the disproportionate identification of multilingual learners in special education. Currently, students with multidimensional identities are often trapped in ambiguous and contradictory education policies and practices that contribute to both under- and over-representation in special education. Given the legacy of racial discrimination in the United States and in Virginia due to its history, students who have multidimensional identities where social categories intersect and interact with power dynamics are more likely to have their needs and outcomes overlooked. For these reasons, this mixed-methods study, situated within a Virginia school district, built on extent disproportionality research by applying a multilevel model of intersectionality to understand the relationship between social categories (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status [SES]), practices, and policies and the disproportionate representation of multilingual learners in special education. We also examined the extent to which multilingual learners are disproportionately over- or under-represented in special education in Virginia, and how disproportionality varies by school level (i.e., grades K–5 for elementary, grades 6–12 for secondary), race/ethnicity, gender, and SES. The quantitative findings from phase one were used to focus on one school district to find out how eligibility processes and services are impacted by organizational structures and school and community contexts. Our results demonstrate disparities for multilingual learners with disabilities by race/ethnicity, gender, and SES. Quantitative findings from this study both support and refute what is known in the extant literature about outcomes related to grade level, race/ethnicity, gender, and SES of multilingual learners with disabilities. The qualitative results, however, illustrate how the larger sociopolitical landscape and perceptions of ability/disability shape eligibility processes and outcomes for these students. Our qualitative data provide insight into multilingual learner disproportionality and the role of context and educational practices that contribute to these types of disparities in special education. The implications of these results for future practice, policy, and research are discussed. Generally speaking, this mixed-methods study shows that (1) using intersectional framing in a risk analysis of multilingual learner disproportionality reveals disparities a one-dimensional approach obscures, (2) representation in special education is associated with a multilingual learner’s social categories (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, SES), and (3) contextual factors impact how multilingual learner eligibility policies and practices are communicated and implemented within schools. The fact that multilingual learner identification with a disability is correlated with social categories suggests that how we address learning challenges may reflect social problems rather than issues related to learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特殊教育中多语言学习者比例失调的背景分析:混合方法
美国公立学校面临的最复杂、最系统的挑战之一,就是特殊教育中对多语言学习者的认定比例过高。目前,具有多维身份的学生往往被困在模棱两可、自相矛盾的教育政策和实践中,导致特殊教育中的比例过低或过高。鉴于美国和弗吉尼亚州历史上遗留下来的种族歧视问题,具有多维身份的学生在社会类别与权力动态相互交织和相互作用的情况下,他们的需求和结果更有可能被忽视。基于这些原因,这项混合方法研究以弗吉尼亚州的一个学区为背景,在比例失调研究的基础上,运用多层次的交叉性模型来理解社会类别(即种族/民族、性别、社会经济地位[SES])、实践和政策与特殊教育中多语言学习者比例失调之间的关系。我们还研究了弗吉尼亚州特殊教育中多语言学习者比例过高或过低的程度,以及不同学校年级(即小学 K-5 年级、中学 6-12 年级)、种族/民族、性别和社会经济地位的比例失调情况。第一阶段的定量研究结果被用于关注一个学区,以了解组织结构及学校和社区环境对资格审查流程和服务的影响。我们的研究结果表明,不同种族/族裔、性别和社会经济地位的多语言残疾学习者之间存在差异。本研究的定量结果既支持也反驳了现有文献中关于残疾多语种学习者的年级、种族/民族、性别和社会经济地位的结果。然而,定性结果说明了更广泛的社会政治环境和对能力/残疾的看法是如何影响这些学生的资格审查过程和结果的。我们的定性数据让我们深入了解了多语言学习者的比例失调问题,以及造成特殊教育中这类差异的环境和教育实践的作用。我们还讨论了这些结果对未来实践、政策和研究的影响。总的来说,这项混合方法研究表明:(1)在多语言学习者比例失调的风险分析中使用交叉框架,揭示了单维度方法所掩盖的差异;(2)特殊教育中的代表性与多语言学习者的社会类别(即种族/民族、性别、社会经济地位)相关;(3)背景因素影响了多语言学习者资格政策和实践在学校中的传播和实施。多语种学习者的残疾鉴定与社会类别相关这一事实表明,我们如何应对学习挑战可能反映了社会问题,而不是与学习相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Situated Partnership: Dynamics of Role Formation in a Research–Practice Partnership “A Wound That Was Already Festering”: The Burdens of a Racial Justice Program on Teachers of Color “It’s a Chance, Not a Choice”: Black Families, School Choice, and Gentrification in Washington, D.C. Colleague and Ally Pandemic Portals and Radical Imaginations: Employing Critical Arts-Based Pedagogies Toward Racial Justice with Secondary Preservice English Teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1