Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detection of Choroidal Metastases: A Retrospective Review

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ocular Oncology and Pathology Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1159/000537949
Michael D. Yu, Sarah Miller, H. Ghoraba, Luis E. Sabage, N. Fischbein, P. Mruthyunjaya
{"title":"Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detection of Choroidal Metastases: \nA Retrospective Review","authors":"Michael D. Yu, Sarah Miller, H. Ghoraba, Luis E. Sabage, N. Fischbein, P. Mruthyunjaya","doi":"10.1159/000537949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:\nTo determine the sensitivity of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of choroidal metastasis (CM) from systemic primary cancers. \n\nMethods:\nA retrospective chart review identified patients with clinically confirmed CM seen on the Oncology Service (Byers Eye Institute) between January 2018 and March 2022. Patients had an MRI brain and/or orbits performed within 3 months of CM diagnosis. Evaluation of CM detection by MRI was then divided into two parts: an initial “standard read,” where determination of CM detection was based solely on the original radiology report, to reflect real-world performance, and a subsequent “dedicated read,” for which a board-certified neuroradiologist, blinded to the laterality and location of the CM, re-evaluated the studies to provide an objective “gold standard” interpretation regarding the radiographic detection of CM. \n\nResults: \nThe study included 42 eyes of 40 patients with confirmed CM. On standard read, MRI detection of CM occurred in 21 of 42 eyes (50%), with no significant difference between MRI brain and orbit protocols (p=0.249). Features associated with improved detection were increased tumor basal diameter (p<0.001) and ultrasonographic tumor thickness (p=0.003). On dedicated read, MRI detection of CM improved to 26 of 33 eyes (76%). Post-gadolinium 3D FLAIR sequence was the most sensitive (88%) for CM detection. 42% and 58% of lesions were visualized using conventional pre-gadolinium T1- and T2-weighted imaging, respectively.\n\nConclusions:\nMRI sensitivity improved from 50% to 76% with focused reinterpretation. Increased utilization of the FLAIR sequence and increased ocular scrutiny may contribute to earlier diagnosis of CM. \n","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the sensitivity of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of choroidal metastasis (CM) from systemic primary cancers. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients with clinically confirmed CM seen on the Oncology Service (Byers Eye Institute) between January 2018 and March 2022. Patients had an MRI brain and/or orbits performed within 3 months of CM diagnosis. Evaluation of CM detection by MRI was then divided into two parts: an initial “standard read,” where determination of CM detection was based solely on the original radiology report, to reflect real-world performance, and a subsequent “dedicated read,” for which a board-certified neuroradiologist, blinded to the laterality and location of the CM, re-evaluated the studies to provide an objective “gold standard” interpretation regarding the radiographic detection of CM. Results: The study included 42 eyes of 40 patients with confirmed CM. On standard read, MRI detection of CM occurred in 21 of 42 eyes (50%), with no significant difference between MRI brain and orbit protocols (p=0.249). Features associated with improved detection were increased tumor basal diameter (p<0.001) and ultrasonographic tumor thickness (p=0.003). On dedicated read, MRI detection of CM improved to 26 of 33 eyes (76%). Post-gadolinium 3D FLAIR sequence was the most sensitive (88%) for CM detection. 42% and 58% of lesions were visualized using conventional pre-gadolinium T1- and T2-weighted imaging, respectively. Conclusions: MRI sensitivity improved from 50% to 76% with focused reinterpretation. Increased utilization of the FLAIR sequence and increased ocular scrutiny may contribute to earlier diagnosis of CM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁共振成像 (MRI) 检测脉络膜转移瘤的灵敏度:回顾性综述
目的:确定脑磁共振成像(MRI)在检测全身性原发性癌症脉络膜转移(CM)方面的灵敏度。方法:回顾性病历审查确定了2018年1月至2022年3月期间在肿瘤学服务处(拜尔斯眼科研究所)就诊的临床确诊CM患者。患者在确诊 CM 后 3 个月内进行了脑部和/或眼眶核磁共振成像检查。核磁共振成像对CM检测的评估分为两部分:最初的 "标准读片",即仅根据原始放射学报告确定CM的检测,以反映真实世界的表现;随后的 "专用读片",即由一位神经放射学委员会认证的医师对CM的侧位和位置进行盲法评估,以提供有关CM放射学检测的客观 "金标准 "解释。研究结果该研究包括 40 名确诊 CM 患者的 42 只眼睛。在标准读数下,42 眼中有 21 眼(50%)通过核磁共振成像检测到了 CM,脑部和眼眶核磁共振成像方案之间无显著差异(P=0.249)。肿瘤基底直径增大(p<0.001)和超声波肿瘤厚度增加(p=0.003)是提高检测率的相关特征。在专用读片中,33 只眼睛中有 26 只(76%)的 MRI CM 检出率有所提高。钆后三维 FLAIR 序列对 CM 检测的灵敏度最高(88%)。结论:磁共振成像的灵敏度在集中重新解读后从 50% 提高到 76%。增加FLAIR序列的使用和加强眼部检查可能有助于更早地诊断出CM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Description and Characteristics of Ocular Tumor Lysis Syndrome. How Much Time Do Focal Treatments for Retinoblastoma Add to Anesthetic Exposure? Ruthenium-106 Plaque Brachytherapy for Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma: A Case Series and Review of Literature. Belzutifan in Individuals with von Hippel-Lindau Retinal Hemangioblastomas: Institutional Experience and Review of the Literature. Clinicopathologic Features of Eyelid Sebaceous Gland Carcinoma Requiring Immunohistochemical Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1