{"title":"Modern Analyses of Macroeconomic Indices for Medium and Long Term Plans in Georgia","authors":"Demur Giorkhelidze","doi":"10.19044/esj.2024.v20n37p26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the economic growth of Georgia through the lens of two key indicators: income/GDP per worker (representing productivity) and income/GDP per capita (representing prosperity). It emphasizes the importance of using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) adjusted data to avoid misleading comparisons between countries with different price levels. The paper highlights three key stylized facts about Georgia's economy: Transformational Shock: Georgia's GDP per capita fell dramatically by 468% in less than ten years due to the collapse of the Soviet economic system. This is a unique event in modern economic history, with no other country experiencing such a sharp decline; Unstable Growth Rates: Unlike the U.S. which shows a relatively stable 2% annual growth rate over 150 years, Georgia's economic growth rates lack a clear trend and fluctuate significantly; Negative Correlation Between Cyclical Unemployment and GDP Gap: The cyclical unemployment rate and the GDP gap in Georgia are inversely correlated. As the unemployment rate falls below the natural rate of unemployment, the GDP gap widens, indicating potential overheating in the economy. The paper argues that existing models of economic growth, often based on developed economies with different macroeconomic realities, may not be suitable for analyzing Georgia's situation. It calls for the development of models that explicitly consider the unique features of Georgia's economy, including the transformational shock, unstable growth rates, and the relationship between unemployment and GDP. Overall, the paper raises important questions about the nature of economic growth in Georgia and the need for tailored models to understand its specific dynamics.","PeriodicalId":12225,"journal":{"name":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","volume":"388 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n37p26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper analyzes the economic growth of Georgia through the lens of two key indicators: income/GDP per worker (representing productivity) and income/GDP per capita (representing prosperity). It emphasizes the importance of using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) adjusted data to avoid misleading comparisons between countries with different price levels. The paper highlights three key stylized facts about Georgia's economy: Transformational Shock: Georgia's GDP per capita fell dramatically by 468% in less than ten years due to the collapse of the Soviet economic system. This is a unique event in modern economic history, with no other country experiencing such a sharp decline; Unstable Growth Rates: Unlike the U.S. which shows a relatively stable 2% annual growth rate over 150 years, Georgia's economic growth rates lack a clear trend and fluctuate significantly; Negative Correlation Between Cyclical Unemployment and GDP Gap: The cyclical unemployment rate and the GDP gap in Georgia are inversely correlated. As the unemployment rate falls below the natural rate of unemployment, the GDP gap widens, indicating potential overheating in the economy. The paper argues that existing models of economic growth, often based on developed economies with different macroeconomic realities, may not be suitable for analyzing Georgia's situation. It calls for the development of models that explicitly consider the unique features of Georgia's economy, including the transformational shock, unstable growth rates, and the relationship between unemployment and GDP. Overall, the paper raises important questions about the nature of economic growth in Georgia and the need for tailored models to understand its specific dynamics.
本文通过两个关键指标分析了格鲁吉亚的经济增长:工人人均收入/国内生产总值(代表生产率)和人均收入/国内生产总值(代表繁荣程度)。它强调了使用购买力平价(PPP)调整数据的重要性,以避免在不同价格水平的国家之间进行误导性比较。本文重点介绍了格鲁吉亚经济的三大典型事实:转型冲击:由于苏联经济体系的崩溃,格鲁吉亚的人均国内生产总值在不到十年的时间里急剧下降了 468%。这是现代经济史上绝无仅有的事件,没有任何其他国家经历过如此剧烈的衰退;不稳定的增长率:与美国 150 年来相对稳定的 2% 的年增长率不同,格鲁吉亚的经济增长率缺乏明确的趋势,波动明显;周期性失业率与 GDP 差距负相关:格鲁吉亚的周期性失业率与 GDP 差距成反比。当失业率低于自然失业率时,国内生产总值差距扩大,表明经济可能过热。本文认为,现有的经济增长模型通常基于宏观经济现实不同的发达经济体,可能不适合分析格鲁吉亚的情况。论文呼吁开发明确考虑格鲁吉亚经济独特特征的模型,包括转型冲击、不稳定的增长率以及失业率与国内生产总值之间的关系。总之,本文提出了有关格鲁吉亚经济增长性质的重要问题,并指出有必要建立量身定制的模型来了解其具体动态。