Analysis of Stakeholders' Trust Level in the Nuclear Energy Domain in Japan

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1115/1.4064778
Kyohei Yoshinaga, Masaki Onodera, Kosuke Shirai, Nobuaki Yoshizawa, Harunaga Yanagawa, Takamichi Kito
{"title":"Analysis of Stakeholders' Trust Level in the Nuclear Energy Domain in Japan","authors":"Kyohei Yoshinaga, Masaki Onodera, Kosuke Shirai, Nobuaki Yoshizawa, Harunaga Yanagawa, Takamichi Kito","doi":"10.1115/1.4064778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In discussions on the nuclear restart policy in Japan, trust among stakeholders in nuclear power is often raised as an issue. However, the discussion has progressed without analyzing the trust demanded by the Japanese public. A questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze the level of trust that 4,700 Japanese citizens (100 from each of the 47 prefectures) have in nuclear stakeholders by breaking trust down into three elements: “Perceived Competence,” “Perceived Motivation,” and “Salient Value Similarity” (SVS), which have been reported in the literature. In the survey, nine stakeholders were targeted: the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA); the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI); the courts; the Diet; host municipalities; nuclear power operators and manufacturers (OMs); experts; research and international organizations (RIOs); and the mass media. The analysis showed that the Japanese public is particularly interested in SVS with “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” among the various nuclear stakeholders. The SVS of “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” was highly correlated with that of organizations promoting nuclear power, suggesting that the public tends to perceive these organizations as sharing similar values. These results offer suggestions for actions that should be taken by each nuclear stakeholder to restore and improve trust.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In discussions on the nuclear restart policy in Japan, trust among stakeholders in nuclear power is often raised as an issue. However, the discussion has progressed without analyzing the trust demanded by the Japanese public. A questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze the level of trust that 4,700 Japanese citizens (100 from each of the 47 prefectures) have in nuclear stakeholders by breaking trust down into three elements: “Perceived Competence,” “Perceived Motivation,” and “Salient Value Similarity” (SVS), which have been reported in the literature. In the survey, nine stakeholders were targeted: the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA); the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI); the courts; the Diet; host municipalities; nuclear power operators and manufacturers (OMs); experts; research and international organizations (RIOs); and the mass media. The analysis showed that the Japanese public is particularly interested in SVS with “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” among the various nuclear stakeholders. The SVS of “nuclear power operators and manufacturers” was highly correlated with that of organizations promoting nuclear power, suggesting that the public tends to perceive these organizations as sharing similar values. These results offer suggestions for actions that should be taken by each nuclear stakeholder to restore and improve trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本核能领域利益相关者信任度分析
在有关日本核电重启政策的讨论中,核电利益相关者之间的信任经常被作为一个问题提出。然而,在讨论过程中却没有对日本公众的信任需求进行分析。我们进行了一项问卷调查,通过将信任分为三个要素,分析了 4,700 名日本公民(47 个都道府县各 100 名)对核电利益相关方的信任程度:这些要素包括 "感知能力"、"感知动机 "和 "显著价值相似性"(SVS)。调查对象包括九个利益相关方:核管制局 (NRA);经济产业省 (METI);法院;国会;东道市;核电运营商和制造商 (OM);专家;研究和国际组织 (RIO);以及大众媒体。分析表明,日本公众尤其关注核利益相关方中 "核电运营商和制造商 "的 SVS。核电运营商和制造商 "的 SVS 与核电推广组织的 SVS 高度相关,表明公众倾向于认为这些组织具有相似的价值观。这些结果为每个核利益相关者恢复和改善信任所应采取的行动提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Turbulent Mixing Factor and Study of Turbulent Flow Structures in PWR Sub Channel by DNS Effect of Radial Neutron Reflector on the Characteristics of Nuclear Fuel Burn-up Wave in a Fast Neutron Energy Spectrum Multiplying Medium: A Consistent Parametric Approach Reviewing Welding Procedures - Checklists for Nuclear Power Systems Performance of NB-CTMFD detector vs Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 detectors for hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) energy spectra neutron sources within lead/concrete shielded configurations Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1