An Empirical Investigation of Ethical Food Choices: A Qualitative Research Approach

Georgios Roumeliotis, Elena Raptou, Konstantinos Polymeros, Konstantinos Galanopoulos
{"title":"An Empirical Investigation of Ethical Food Choices: A Qualitative Research Approach","authors":"Georgios Roumeliotis, Elena Raptou, Konstantinos Polymeros, Konstantinos Galanopoulos","doi":"10.3390/proceedings2024094050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Why do customers incorporate concerns about social and environmental issues into the decision-making process? How ethical are food choices in the modern world? Answers to these questions have often revolved around how informed consumers might be and whether they have the appropriate skills to act on concerns they might have. Today, ethical food consumption is a growing market where consumers’ behavior shifts from the rational manner focusing on the products price and attributes to the food ethics associated with environment, social welfare, public health, and morality. Using data selected from a purposive sample of 20 consumers, this study employed a qualitative research procedure to explore the main dimensions that influence the decision-making process and eating preferences in the post-COVID 19 era and within an economically turbulent environment. The main results showed that health protection, sustainability, and social wefare constitute the main axes of ethical food consumption. Participants were found to be more individualists than altruists since the “personal health” dimension was the most prevalent. Future research should extend these findings and explore variations in the ethical consumption factors among various consumer segments.","PeriodicalId":516831,"journal":{"name":"The 17th International Conference of the Hellenic Association of Agricultural Economists","volume":"209 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 17th International Conference of the Hellenic Association of Agricultural Economists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Why do customers incorporate concerns about social and environmental issues into the decision-making process? How ethical are food choices in the modern world? Answers to these questions have often revolved around how informed consumers might be and whether they have the appropriate skills to act on concerns they might have. Today, ethical food consumption is a growing market where consumers’ behavior shifts from the rational manner focusing on the products price and attributes to the food ethics associated with environment, social welfare, public health, and morality. Using data selected from a purposive sample of 20 consumers, this study employed a qualitative research procedure to explore the main dimensions that influence the decision-making process and eating preferences in the post-COVID 19 era and within an economically turbulent environment. The main results showed that health protection, sustainability, and social wefare constitute the main axes of ethical food consumption. Participants were found to be more individualists than altruists since the “personal health” dimension was the most prevalent. Future research should extend these findings and explore variations in the ethical consumption factors among various consumer segments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德食品选择的实证调查:定性研究方法
:为什么顾客会在决策过程中考虑社会和环境问题?现代社会的食品选择有多道德?对这些问题的回答往往围绕着消费者的知情程度以及他们是否具备适当的技能来采取行动解决他们可能关心的问题。如今,道德食品消费是一个不断增长的市场,消费者的行为从关注产品价格和属性的理性方式转向与环境、社会福利、公共卫生和道德相关的食品道德。本研究采用定性研究方法,从 20 位消费者的目的性样本中选取数据,探讨了在后 COVID 19 时代和经济动荡环境中影响决策过程和饮食偏好的主要因素。主要结果表明,健康保护、可持续性和社会福利构成了道德食品消费的主轴。由于 "个人健康 "维度最为普遍,因此发现参与者更倾向于个人主义而非利他主义。未来的研究应扩展这些发现,探索不同消费群体在道德消费因素方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface of the 17th International Conference of the Hellenic Association of Agricultural Economists (ETAGRO 2023) in Thessaloniki, Greece Development of A Non-Invasive System for the Automatic Detection of Cattle Lameness Gastronomic Tourism and Festivals: Views from Potential Tourists in Greece and South Korea Discovering Innovation, Social Capital and Farm Viability in the Framework of the United Winemaking Agricultural Cooperative of Samos How Do Agricultural Education, Advisory, and Financial Factors Affect the Adoption of Precision Farming in Greece?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1