Correlation between Lactate Dehydrogenase to Albumin Ratio and the Prognosis of Patients with Cardiac Arrest

Lili Ye, Jianhong Lu, Meng Yuan, Jie Min, Lei Zhong, Junfei Xu
{"title":"Correlation between Lactate Dehydrogenase to Albumin Ratio and the Prognosis of Patients with Cardiac Arrest","authors":"Lili Ye, Jianhong Lu, Meng Yuan, Jie Min, Lei Zhong, Junfei Xu","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2502065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common event in the intensive care unit (ICU), which seriously threatens the prognosis of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to determine a simple and effective clinical indicator to judge the prognosis of patients after a CA for later treatments. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) and the prognosis of patients after a CA. Methods : The clinical data of participants was obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v2.0; 2008 to 2019). According to the 30-day prognosis, patients were divided into a survivors group (n = 216) and a non-survivors group (n = 304). The optimal LAR threshold was determined using restricted cubic spline (RCS), which divided patients into a high LAR group ( ≥ 15.50, n = 257) and a low LAR group ( < 15.50, n = 263). The ICU hospitalization and 30-day accumulative survival curves of the two groups were plotted following the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between the LAR and the prognosis of CA patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the LAR on 30-day all-cause mortality, and sensitivity analysis was used to check the reliability of the findings. Results : A total of 520 patients with CA were enrolled and the 30-day mortality was 58.46%. The LAR in the non-survivors group was higher than in the survivors group. The RCS showed a linear trend relationship between the LAR and the mortality risk in patients during their ICU stay and 30 days; moreover, as the LAR increased, so did the risk of mortality. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that compared with the low LAR group, the cumulative survival rates of ICU hospitalization and 30 days were lower in the high LAR group among CA patients ( p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an elevated LAR ( ≥ 15.50) was an independent risk factor for mortality during ICU stay and 30 days ( p < 0.005). ROC analysis suggested that the LAR was superior to the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in predicting the 30-day all-cause mortality in CA patients (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.676, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.629–0.723). To verify the reliability of our findings, we performed sensitivity analyses and found that the findings were reliable. Conclusions : An elevated LAR might be a predictor of mortality in patients following a CA during ICU hospitalization and 30 days, thereby it can be used to provide a reference for the clinical management of these patients.","PeriodicalId":507771,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2502065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common event in the intensive care unit (ICU), which seriously threatens the prognosis of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to determine a simple and effective clinical indicator to judge the prognosis of patients after a CA for later treatments. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) and the prognosis of patients after a CA. Methods : The clinical data of participants was obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v2.0; 2008 to 2019). According to the 30-day prognosis, patients were divided into a survivors group (n = 216) and a non-survivors group (n = 304). The optimal LAR threshold was determined using restricted cubic spline (RCS), which divided patients into a high LAR group ( ≥ 15.50, n = 257) and a low LAR group ( < 15.50, n = 263). The ICU hospitalization and 30-day accumulative survival curves of the two groups were plotted following the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between the LAR and the prognosis of CA patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the LAR on 30-day all-cause mortality, and sensitivity analysis was used to check the reliability of the findings. Results : A total of 520 patients with CA were enrolled and the 30-day mortality was 58.46%. The LAR in the non-survivors group was higher than in the survivors group. The RCS showed a linear trend relationship between the LAR and the mortality risk in patients during their ICU stay and 30 days; moreover, as the LAR increased, so did the risk of mortality. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that compared with the low LAR group, the cumulative survival rates of ICU hospitalization and 30 days were lower in the high LAR group among CA patients ( p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an elevated LAR ( ≥ 15.50) was an independent risk factor for mortality during ICU stay and 30 days ( p < 0.005). ROC analysis suggested that the LAR was superior to the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in predicting the 30-day all-cause mortality in CA patients (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.676, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.629–0.723). To verify the reliability of our findings, we performed sensitivity analyses and found that the findings were reliable. Conclusions : An elevated LAR might be a predictor of mortality in patients following a CA during ICU hospitalization and 30 days, thereby it can be used to provide a reference for the clinical management of these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比率与心脏骤停患者预后的相关性
背景:心脏骤停(CA)是重症监护病房(ICU)的常见病,严重威胁患者的预后。因此,确定一个简单有效的临床指标来判断心脏骤停患者的预后以进行后期治疗至关重要。本研究旨在探讨乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值(LAR)与 CA 患者预后之间的关系。方法:参与者的临床数据来自重症监护医学信息市场 IV(MIMIC-IV,v2.0;2008 年至 2019 年)。根据30天的预后,患者被分为存活组(n = 216)和非存活组(n = 304)。使用受限立方样条曲线(RCS)确定最佳LAR阈值,将患者分为高LAR组(≥ 15.50,n = 257)和低LAR组(< 15.50,n = 263)。根据卡普兰-米尔生存分析法绘制了两组患者的ICU住院和30天累积生存曲线。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析 LAR 与 CA 患者预后之间的关系。绘制接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来评估LAR对30天全因死亡率的预测效果,并使用敏感性分析来检验研究结果的可靠性。结果:共纳入520名CA患者,30天死亡率为58.46%。非存活组的 LAR 值高于存活组。RCS显示,在重症监护室住院期间和30天内,LAR与患者的死亡风险呈线性趋势关系;此外,随着LAR的增加,死亡风险也在增加。卡普兰-梅耶生存曲线显示,与低LAR组相比,高LAR组CA患者在ICU住院和30天内的累积生存率较低(P < 0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,LAR 升高(≥ 15.50)是 ICU 住院期间和 30 天内死亡的独立危险因素(P < 0.005)。ROC分析表明,LAR在预测CA患者30天全因死亡率方面优于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.676,95%置信区间[CI]:0.629-0.723):0.629-0.723).为了验证研究结果的可靠性,我们进行了敏感性分析,发现研究结果是可靠的。结论 :LAR 升高可能是预测 CA 患者在重症监护室住院期间和 30 天内死亡率的一个指标,因此可为这些患者的临床管理提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 35,409 Patients Undergoing PCI versus CABG for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases Papillary Muscle Maneuvers: Pathophysiology-based Approach in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction Current Antithrombotic Treatments for Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review Characteristics and Factors of 30-Day Readmissions after Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1