DELIGNIFICATION METHODS FOR EMPTY FRUIT BUNCH CO-SUBSTRATE IN POME ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.21894/jopr.2024.0016
Muhammad Alplex FIRSTONDA KATON
{"title":"DELIGNIFICATION METHODS FOR EMPTY FRUIT BUNCH CO-SUBSTRATE IN POME ANAEROBIC DIGESTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"Muhammad Alplex FIRSTONDA KATON","doi":"10.21894/jopr.2024.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empty fruit bunch (EFB) enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by acting as a co-substrate. Yet, lignin in EFB inhibits the performance boost. Therefore, EFB was delignified before using it as a co-substrate as much as 4%. This study compared three delignification techniques using the pairwise comparison method: Bacterial, chemical, and hydrothermal. Three parameter variations were selected for each method, namely bacterial concentration, molar concentration, and temperatures. Chemical delignification at a NaOH concentration of 2 M yielded the largest production of biogas and methane (302.0 and 153.8 mL, respectively), followed by hydrothermal at 180°C (260.0 and 83.8 mL, respectively). Although bacterial delignification required a long time (2 weeks), it was the simplest to implement and yielded the largest lignin reduction. However, the bacterial method yielded lower biogas (103-204 mL) than hydrothermal and chemical, probably because of lower hemi-and cellulose contents. Based on biogas and methane yield, production hazards, preparation time, and required infrastructure, chemical delignification was selected as the best method because of its gas production, followed closely by hydrothermal due to its efficiency and safety.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"276 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2024.0016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empty fruit bunch (EFB) enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by acting as a co-substrate. Yet, lignin in EFB inhibits the performance boost. Therefore, EFB was delignified before using it as a co-substrate as much as 4%. This study compared three delignification techniques using the pairwise comparison method: Bacterial, chemical, and hydrothermal. Three parameter variations were selected for each method, namely bacterial concentration, molar concentration, and temperatures. Chemical delignification at a NaOH concentration of 2 M yielded the largest production of biogas and methane (302.0 and 153.8 mL, respectively), followed by hydrothermal at 180°C (260.0 and 83.8 mL, respectively). Although bacterial delignification required a long time (2 weeks), it was the simplest to implement and yielded the largest lignin reduction. However, the bacterial method yielded lower biogas (103-204 mL) than hydrothermal and chemical, probably because of lower hemi-and cellulose contents. Based on biogas and methane yield, production hazards, preparation time, and required infrastructure, chemical delignification was selected as the best method because of its gas production, followed closely by hydrothermal due to its efficiency and safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
果穗厌氧消化中空果穗辅助基质的脱木质方法:实验对比分析
在对棕榈油厂污水(POME)进行厌氧消化时,空果束(EFB)作为辅助底物可提高沼气产量。然而,EFB 中的木质素会抑制性能的提升。因此,在将 EFB 用作辅助底物之前,要对其进行木质素脱除处理,脱除率高达 4%。本研究采用成对比较法对三种木质素化技术进行了比较:细菌法、化学法和水热法。每种方法都选择了三个参数变化,即细菌浓度、摩尔浓度和温度。在 NaOH 浓度为 2 M 的条件下进行化学木质素化,产生的沼气和甲烷最多(分别为 302.0 毫升和 153.8 毫升),其次是在 180°C 的条件下进行水热法(分别为 260.0 毫升和 83.8 毫升)。虽然细菌脱木素需要较长的时间(2 周),但这种方法最简单易行,木质素的减少量也最大。不过,细菌法产生的沼气(103-204 mL)低于水热法和化学法,可能是因为半纤维素和纤维素含量较低。根据沼气和甲烷产量、生产危害、准备时间和所需基础设施,化学脱木素法因其产气量而被选为最佳方法,水热法因其效率和安全性而紧随其后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic Design in Photocatalysis. Visible-Light-Mediated aza Paternò–Büchi Reactions and Related Cycloadditions for the Formation of Azetidines and Azetines Thianthrenium Salts in Photochemistry Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1