Navigating Tensions in Designing a Curriculum That Prepares Preservice Teachers for School-Based Learning

Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.25159/1947-9417/14677
Carol Bertram, L. Rusznyak
{"title":"Navigating Tensions in Designing a Curriculum That Prepares Preservice Teachers for School-Based Learning","authors":"Carol Bertram, L. Rusznyak","doi":"10.25159/1947-9417/14677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A long-standing concern in teacher education is the variability in the quality of practicum experiences afforded to preservice teachers. Although some variability is due to their personal attributes, preservice teachers often find it difficult to connect theoretical insights to teachers’ classroom practices. These challenges can be exacerbated when teachers do not explain the reasoning for what they do and why. School closures during the pandemic provided South African teacher educators with an opportunity to address this concern. We participated in developing a national online module that prepares preservice teachers for school-based learning through guided lesson study. This article adopts a self-study approach to account for the curriculum choices in developing this module. Three tensions needed consideration: portraying teaching as an individualised pursuit and/or a social practice, focusing on generic and/or specialised pedagogies, and focusing on the tacit and/or explicit reasoning that teachers do. We account for how we worked within and between these tensions. A module of this nature potentially enhances school-based learning by making the reasoning of teachers explicit to preservice teachers. To achieve this potential and to advance work-integrated learning as a scholarship, the conceptual underpinnings of the module and its curriculum design must be open to reflection and scrutiny.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"302 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/14677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A long-standing concern in teacher education is the variability in the quality of practicum experiences afforded to preservice teachers. Although some variability is due to their personal attributes, preservice teachers often find it difficult to connect theoretical insights to teachers’ classroom practices. These challenges can be exacerbated when teachers do not explain the reasoning for what they do and why. School closures during the pandemic provided South African teacher educators with an opportunity to address this concern. We participated in developing a national online module that prepares preservice teachers for school-based learning through guided lesson study. This article adopts a self-study approach to account for the curriculum choices in developing this module. Three tensions needed consideration: portraying teaching as an individualised pursuit and/or a social practice, focusing on generic and/or specialised pedagogies, and focusing on the tacit and/or explicit reasoning that teachers do. We account for how we worked within and between these tensions. A module of this nature potentially enhances school-based learning by making the reasoning of teachers explicit to preservice teachers. To achieve this potential and to advance work-integrated learning as a scholarship, the conceptual underpinnings of the module and its curriculum design must be open to reflection and scrutiny.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在设计培养职前教师进行校本学习的课程时驾驭紧张关系
师范教育中一个长期存在的问题是,为职前教师提供的实习经历质量参差不齐。尽管有些差异是由教师的个人特质造成的,但职前教师往往发现很难将理论见解与教师的课堂实践联系起来。如果教师不解释他们这样做的理由和原因,这些挑战就会加剧。大流行病期间的学校关闭为南非教师教育工作者提供了一个解决这一问题的机会。我们参与开发了一个全国性的在线模块,通过指导课程学习,为职前教师的校本学习做好准备。本文采用自学的方法来说明开发该模块时的课程选择。需要考虑三个矛盾:将教学描绘成个性化追求和/或社会实践;关注通用和/或专业教学法;关注教师所做的隐性和/或显性推理。我们阐述了如何在这些矛盾中开展工作。这种性质的模块通过向职前教师阐明教师的推理,有可能加强校本学习。为了实现这一潜能,并推动工作结合学习这一学术研究,该模块的概念基础及其课程设计必须接受反思和审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1