Do NHS talking therapies services and couple therapy for depression have a relationship problem?

Q4 Psychology Clinical Psychology Forum Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.372.27
Melanie Shepherd
{"title":"Do NHS talking therapies services and couple therapy for depression have a relationship problem?","authors":"Melanie Shepherd","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.372.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PHOTO CREDIT: Antoni ShkrabaCouple Therapy for Depression (CTfD) is unique being the only NHS Talking Therapies Services (NHSTTS) therapy involving partners. As a couple therapy it is systemic as well as behavioural. CTfD is an effective intervention for both depression and relationship distress and achieves good recovery-rates for depression and anxiety compared with other ‘high-intenstty’ therapies.Delivery of CTfD in NHSTTS is inadequate. Over a third of NHSTTS provide no CTfD. When they do, delivery is so minimal that depressed clients cannot generally access CTfD. Since 2010, 1172 CTfD therapists have been trained yet, in 2021/2, only 1574 couples received CTfD (approximately one couple seen per year per therapist). This is wasteful given the investment of time and money.Constraints affecting delivery e.g. individually-focused organisational culture of NHSTTS, misunderstanding of the role of CTfD therapists, inappropriate referrals, inadequate supervision and delivery on a minimal scale, are discussed and recommendations outlined.Clients deserve genuine choice, staff need support to deliver CTfD effectively, and referral quantity and quality require urgent attention.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"1173 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2024.1.372.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PHOTO CREDIT: Antoni ShkrabaCouple Therapy for Depression (CTfD) is unique being the only NHS Talking Therapies Services (NHSTTS) therapy involving partners. As a couple therapy it is systemic as well as behavioural. CTfD is an effective intervention for both depression and relationship distress and achieves good recovery-rates for depression and anxiety compared with other ‘high-intenstty’ therapies.Delivery of CTfD in NHSTTS is inadequate. Over a third of NHSTTS provide no CTfD. When they do, delivery is so minimal that depressed clients cannot generally access CTfD. Since 2010, 1172 CTfD therapists have been trained yet, in 2021/2, only 1574 couples received CTfD (approximately one couple seen per year per therapist). This is wasteful given the investment of time and money.Constraints affecting delivery e.g. individually-focused organisational culture of NHSTTS, misunderstanding of the role of CTfD therapists, inappropriate referrals, inadequate supervision and delivery on a minimal scale, are discussed and recommendations outlined.Clients deserve genuine choice, staff need support to deliver CTfD effectively, and referral quantity and quality require urgent attention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家医疗服务体系的谈话疗法服务和抑郁症的夫妻疗法是否存在关系问题?
图片来源:Antoni Shkraba抑郁症夫妻疗法(CTfD)是英国国家医疗服务系统谈话疗法服务(NHSTTS)中唯一涉及伴侣的疗法,具有独特性。作为一种夫妻疗法,它既是系统疗法,也是行为疗法。与其他 "高强度 "疗法相比,CTfD 对抑郁和关系困扰都是一种有效的干预措施,并在抑郁和焦虑方面取得了良好的康复率。超过三分之一的 NHSTTS 没有提供 CTfD。即使提供,也是微乎其微,以至于抑郁症患者通常无法获得 CTfD。自 2010 年以来,已有 1172 名 CTfD 治疗师接受了培训,但在 2021/2 年,仅有 1574 对夫妇接受了 CTfD(每位治疗师每年约为一对夫妇提供治疗)。本文讨论了影响 CTfD 实施的制约因素,如 NHSTTS 以个人为中心的组织文化、对 CTfD 治疗师角色的误解、不适当的转介、监督不足以及在最小规模上实施 CTfD,并概述了相关建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Forum
Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Service evaluation of reflective parenting groups: What are parents’ perspectives on the usefulness of RP groups in improving parental mentalisation and reflective functioning? A service evaluation exploring ethnic monitoring in a Specialist Perinatal Mental Health service: Barriers and improvement opportunities Building families through MAR (medically assisted reproduction), donor conception and surrogacy: Where does this fit into clinical psychology? Learning from reflection – good practice in handover with neurodiverse clients Racialised minority women’s experiences of psychological intervention across perinatal and maternal mental health services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1