Jordemoderliv

Sarah Marie Jäpelt, Christina Falkenberg, Anne Helbo
{"title":"Jordemoderliv","authors":"Sarah Marie Jäpelt, Christina Falkenberg, Anne Helbo","doi":"10.7146/chku.v8i1.143452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this article we examine the professional and cultural practices of Danish midwifes, and how these unfold in the governmental framework in which they exist. Inspired by the current public and political debate about poor working environment and staff defection within the national maternity wards, the WEA 1 guidelines on unclear and conflicting demands at work, and newer research into moral distress, we examine the different ways in which governmental management, professional autonomy and estimation practices collide and are managed by midwifes in their working life. We find that midwifes must navigate and balance governmental demands, professional and ethical core values. These different requests can, by the midwifes, be experienced as contradictory and at times professionally and ethically inexpedient. We find that what is experienced as contradictory or inexpedient, and what strategies are used to cope, vary according to what function the midwives carry and which core values they find to be central to their practice. However, the conflicting demands has the potential to challenge the midwifes on their professional and ethical core values in such a way, that some ultimately consider leaving the profession.","PeriodicalId":107660,"journal":{"name":"Culture and History: Student Research Papers","volume":"242 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and History: Student Research Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/chku.v8i1.143452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In this article we examine the professional and cultural practices of Danish midwifes, and how these unfold in the governmental framework in which they exist. Inspired by the current public and political debate about poor working environment and staff defection within the national maternity wards, the WEA 1 guidelines on unclear and conflicting demands at work, and newer research into moral distress, we examine the different ways in which governmental management, professional autonomy and estimation practices collide and are managed by midwifes in their working life. We find that midwifes must navigate and balance governmental demands, professional and ethical core values. These different requests can, by the midwifes, be experienced as contradictory and at times professionally and ethically inexpedient. We find that what is experienced as contradictory or inexpedient, and what strategies are used to cope, vary according to what function the midwives carry and which core values they find to be central to their practice. However, the conflicting demands has the potential to challenge the midwifes on their professional and ethical core values in such a way, that some ultimately consider leaving the profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产
:在这篇文章中,我们研究了丹麦助产士的职业和文化实践,以及这些实践是如何在她们所处的政府框架内展开的。受当前关于国家产科病房工作环境恶劣和员工叛逃的公共和政治辩论、WEA 1 关于工作要求不明确和相互冲突的指导方针以及有关道德困扰的最新研究的启发,我们研究了助产士在其工作生活中政府管理、专业自主和估算实践相互碰撞和管理的不同方式。我们发现,助产士必须在政府要求、专业和道德核心价值观之间取得平衡。对于助产士来说,这些不同的要求可能是相互矛盾的,有时在专业和道德上也是不恰当的。我们发现,不同的助产士所承担的职能不同,她们认为哪些核心价值观是其实践的核心,她们所感受到的矛盾或不恰当之处以及她们所采取的应对策略也不尽相同。然而,相互冲突的要求有可能对助产士的专业和道德核心价值观提出挑战,以至于有些助产士最终考虑离开这一行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Historical perspective on carbon offsets Brundtland report in Denmark Forord Indholdsfortegnelse Plague narratives from the great lakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1