Factors Associated with Use of Traditional Birth Attendants for Child Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study

Genevieve Agboyo, Andrews Asamoah, J. Ganle, Augustine Kumah
{"title":"Factors Associated with Use of Traditional Birth Attendants for Child Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Genevieve Agboyo, Andrews Asamoah, J. Ganle, Augustine Kumah","doi":"10.36401/jqsh-23-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Even though the use of skilled birth attendants at birth reduces the risk of maternal mortality and associated complications, some pregnant women prefer to use either traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or deliver at home. Although the use of assisted delivery was reduced between 2014 and 2016 in North Tongu, the rate of TBA use among pregnant women in the district was increasing. There is, therefore, the need to establish the reason for this increase in TBA use. We conducted a study to assess factors that influence the use of TBAs in the North Tongu district.\n \n \n \n A retrospective cross-sectional facility-based survey was conducted among 449 women who delivered within the past 12 months and were accessing postnatal care services in the North Tongu district. A simple random sampling method was used to select women who attend child welfare clinics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors that were significantly associated with use of TBAs. All statistical analyses were done at a 95% confidence level with statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05.\n \n \n \n The mean age of the respondents was 27.0 years ± 6.2 SD. The prevalence of use of TBA during childbirth among women was 26.5%. Factors that significantly influenced use of TBAs during childbirth were age, religion, educational status, and parity. Other significant factors included several antenatal care visits and the attitude of health workers toward pregnant women.\n \n \n \n Use of TBA services at birth in the study district remains relatively high. Women who use antenatal and postnatal care services should be educated on the importance of skilled delivery. There is also a need to equip TBAs and reposition them as link agents to facilitate referrals of pregnant women to health facilities where there is a need for additional birth attendants.\n","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-23-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though the use of skilled birth attendants at birth reduces the risk of maternal mortality and associated complications, some pregnant women prefer to use either traditional birth attendants (TBAs) or deliver at home. Although the use of assisted delivery was reduced between 2014 and 2016 in North Tongu, the rate of TBA use among pregnant women in the district was increasing. There is, therefore, the need to establish the reason for this increase in TBA use. We conducted a study to assess factors that influence the use of TBAs in the North Tongu district. A retrospective cross-sectional facility-based survey was conducted among 449 women who delivered within the past 12 months and were accessing postnatal care services in the North Tongu district. A simple random sampling method was used to select women who attend child welfare clinics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors that were significantly associated with use of TBAs. All statistical analyses were done at a 95% confidence level with statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05. The mean age of the respondents was 27.0 years ± 6.2 SD. The prevalence of use of TBA during childbirth among women was 26.5%. Factors that significantly influenced use of TBAs during childbirth were age, religion, educational status, and parity. Other significant factors included several antenatal care visits and the attitude of health workers toward pregnant women. Use of TBA services at birth in the study district remains relatively high. Women who use antenatal and postnatal care services should be educated on the importance of skilled delivery. There is also a need to equip TBAs and reposition them as link agents to facilitate referrals of pregnant women to health facilities where there is a need for additional birth attendants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用传统助产士接生的相关因素:横断面研究
尽管在分娩时使用熟练的助产士可降低孕产妇死亡和相关并发症的风险,但一些孕妇更愿意使用传统助产士(TBAs)或在家分娩。虽然在 2014 年至 2016 年期间,北通古地区使用助产士接生的情况有所减少,但该地区孕妇使用传统助产士接生的比例却在上升。因此,有必要确定使用 TBA 增加的原因。我们开展了一项研究,以评估影响北汤古地区使用传统助产士的因素。 我们对北通古地区在过去 12 个月内分娩并接受产后护理服务的 449 名产妇进行了一项基于设施的回顾性横断面调查。调查采用简单随机抽样法,选取了在儿童福利诊所就诊的妇女。我们进行了二元和多元分析,以确定与使用传统助产士显著相关的因素。所有统计分析均在 95% 的置信水平下进行,统计显著性为 p≤ 0.05。 受访者的平均年龄为 27.0 岁 ± 6.2 SD。妇女在分娩时使用传统助产士的比例为 26.5%。对分娩时使用传统助产士有重大影响的因素包括年龄、宗教信仰、教育状况和胎次。其他重要因素包括多次产前检查和卫生工作者对孕妇的态度。 在研究地区,分娩时使用传统助产士服务的比例仍然较高。应向使用产前和产后护理服务的妇女宣传熟练接生的重要性。此外,还需要为传统助产士配备设备,并将她们重新定位为联系代理,以便于将孕妇转诊到需要额外助产士的医疗机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Group Antenatal Care Start-Up in the Indian Private Sector: An Implementation Journey to Improve Quality of Care. Accreditation Made Easy: Step-by-Step Guide for Healthcare Institutions. Summary of the 5th International Pharmacoeconomics Forum. Community Health Needs Assessment of Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Prescribing Errors in an Ambulatory Care Setting: Mitigating Risks in Outpatient Medication Orders, Cross-Sectional Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1