Do leaf traits affect insect herbivory in a Chinese cork oak forest?

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.33494/nzjfs542024x294x
Xinliang Shao, Ke Cheng, Qin Zhang, Fei Xu, Lili Li
{"title":"Do leaf traits affect insect herbivory in a Chinese cork oak forest?","authors":"Xinliang Shao, Ke Cheng, Qin Zhang, Fei Xu, Lili Li","doi":"10.33494/nzjfs542024x294x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is widely accepted that certain leaf traits indicating leaf quality play an important role in regulating insect herbivory. Numerous studies have attempted to find a clear relationship between insect herbivory and leaf traits. However, the results are inconsistent. In particular, it is still unclear whether leaf traits of a tree species affect insect herbivory in the field.\nMethods: We examined the effects of leaf traits including structural defensive traits (specific leaf area), nutritional traits (nitrogen content, water content, and soluble sugar content), and chemical defensive traits (tannin content and carbon content) on variation of insect herbivory among three forest strata (vertical variability) and 18 locations (horizontal variability) in a Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis) forest landscape.\nResults: Vertically, insect herbivory in the low-canopy stratum was significantly higher than in the other strata, but variation of leaf traits among strata had little explanatory power for the vertical pattern of insect herbivory. Horizontally, leaf carbon content had weak negative effects on insect herbivory while leaf tannin content had weak and divergent effects on insect herbivory in different strata.\nConclusions: Leaf traits selected in this study have weak effects on insect herbivory in the Chinese cork oak forests we studied. These effects may be masked by other abiotic and biotic factors, but further examination is needed.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"155 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33494/nzjfs542024x294x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is widely accepted that certain leaf traits indicating leaf quality play an important role in regulating insect herbivory. Numerous studies have attempted to find a clear relationship between insect herbivory and leaf traits. However, the results are inconsistent. In particular, it is still unclear whether leaf traits of a tree species affect insect herbivory in the field. Methods: We examined the effects of leaf traits including structural defensive traits (specific leaf area), nutritional traits (nitrogen content, water content, and soluble sugar content), and chemical defensive traits (tannin content and carbon content) on variation of insect herbivory among three forest strata (vertical variability) and 18 locations (horizontal variability) in a Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis) forest landscape. Results: Vertically, insect herbivory in the low-canopy stratum was significantly higher than in the other strata, but variation of leaf traits among strata had little explanatory power for the vertical pattern of insect herbivory. Horizontally, leaf carbon content had weak negative effects on insect herbivory while leaf tannin content had weak and divergent effects on insect herbivory in different strata. Conclusions: Leaf traits selected in this study have weak effects on insect herbivory in the Chinese cork oak forests we studied. These effects may be masked by other abiotic and biotic factors, but further examination is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叶片特征会影响中国栓皮栎林中昆虫的食草量吗?
背景:人们普遍认为,表明叶片质量的某些叶片性状在调节昆虫食草方面起着重要作用。许多研究都试图找到昆虫食草与叶片性状之间的明确关系。然而,研究结果并不一致。特别是,树种的叶片性状是否会影响昆虫在野外的食草性仍不清楚:方法:我们研究了中国栓皮栎(Quercus variabilis)森林景观中三个森林地层(垂直变异)和18个地点(水平变异)的叶片性状,包括结构防御性状(比叶面积)、营养性状(氮含量、含水量和可溶性糖含量)和化学防御性状(单宁含量和碳含量)对昆虫食草量变化的影响:结果:从垂直方向看,低冠层的昆虫食草量明显高于其他层,但层间叶片特征的变化对昆虫食草量的垂直模式几乎没有解释力。在水平方向上,叶片碳含量对昆虫草食性有微弱的负面影响,而叶片单宁含量对不同地层昆虫草食性的影响微弱且存在差异:本研究选择的叶片性状对所研究的中国栓皮栎林中昆虫的食草性有微弱的影响。这些影响可能被其他非生物和生物因素所掩盖,但还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Photon Management in Photochemical Synthesis and Reactor Scale-Up. Manifestations of Boron-Alkali Metal and Boron-Alkaline-Earth Metal Romances Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Mapping and Rewiring Biology via Proximity Induction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1