A Comparative Study of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Suprainguinal versus Infrainguinal Approach of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block using 0.2% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia

P. Mathur, Ananda Prakash Banerjee, R. Yadav
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Suprainguinal versus Infrainguinal Approach of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block using 0.2% Ropivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia","authors":"P. Mathur, Ananda Prakash Banerjee, R. Yadav","doi":"10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_30_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a useful modality to provide postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery.\n \n \n \n The aims of this study were to compare the analgesic efficacy of suprainguinal versus infrainguinal approach of ultrasound-guided FICB using 0.2% ropivacaine in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia.\n \n \n \n It was a prospective, randomized, controlled study.\n \n \n \n Group A (n = 25) received ultrasound-guided FICB by suprainguinal approach and Group B (n = 25) received ultrasound-guided FICB by infrainguinal approach. The primary objective was to compare 24-h postoperative analgesic efficacy using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score.\n \n \n \n For data analysis, t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and Chi-square test were applied.\n \n \n \n NRS score after 30 min of FICB in Group A was 2.36 ± 1.11 which was lower in comparison to 3.28 ± 0.94 in Group B (P = 0.002). NRS score during positioning in Group A was 2.16 ± 0.90, which was lower than Group B 3.08 ± 0.81 (P = 0. 0004). Greater block coverage was achieved in obturator nerve distribution in Group A 0.76 ± 0.52 compared to 0.16 ± 0.37 in Group B (P < 0.001). The total duration of analgesia was 493.40 ± 214.83 min, which was more in Group A than in Group B 367.48 ± 63.92 min (P = 0.007). Quality of recovery (QoR) score out of 150 in Group A was 120.60 ± 8.91 compared to 110.40 ± 7.59 in Group B (P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n FICB by suprainguinal approach provides better analgesia, sensory block coverage, and conditions for positioning for spinal anesthesia and also has a higher time to first rescue analgesic requirement with better QoR compared to infrainguinal approach.\n","PeriodicalId":32328,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pain","volume":"380 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_30_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a useful modality to provide postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture undergoing surgery. The aims of this study were to compare the analgesic efficacy of suprainguinal versus infrainguinal approach of ultrasound-guided FICB using 0.2% ropivacaine in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia. It was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Group A (n = 25) received ultrasound-guided FICB by suprainguinal approach and Group B (n = 25) received ultrasound-guided FICB by infrainguinal approach. The primary objective was to compare 24-h postoperative analgesic efficacy using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. For data analysis, t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and Chi-square test were applied. NRS score after 30 min of FICB in Group A was 2.36 ± 1.11 which was lower in comparison to 3.28 ± 0.94 in Group B (P = 0.002). NRS score during positioning in Group A was 2.16 ± 0.90, which was lower than Group B 3.08 ± 0.81 (P = 0. 0004). Greater block coverage was achieved in obturator nerve distribution in Group A 0.76 ± 0.52 compared to 0.16 ± 0.37 in Group B (P < 0.001). The total duration of analgesia was 493.40 ± 214.83 min, which was more in Group A than in Group B 367.48 ± 63.92 min (P = 0.007). Quality of recovery (QoR) score out of 150 in Group A was 120.60 ± 8.91 compared to 110.40 ± 7.59 in Group B (P < 0.001). FICB by suprainguinal approach provides better analgesia, sensory block coverage, and conditions for positioning for spinal anesthesia and also has a higher time to first rescue analgesic requirement with better QoR compared to infrainguinal approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在脊柱麻醉下接受髋部骨折手术的患者术后使用 0.2% 罗哌卡因在超声引导下进行肌筋膜间隙阻滞的腹股沟上法与腹股沟下法镇痛效果比较研究
髂筋膜室阻滞(FICB)是为接受手术的髋部骨折患者提供术后镇痛的一种有效方式。 本研究旨在比较在椎管内麻醉下接受髋部骨折手术的患者在超声引导下使用0.2%罗哌卡因进行髂上筋膜间室阻滞与髂下筋膜间室阻滞的镇痛效果。 这是一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。 A组(25人)接受超声引导下的腹股沟上入路FICB,B组(25人)接受超声引导下的腹股沟下入路FICB。主要目的是通过数值评定量表(NRS)评分比较术后 24 小时的镇痛效果。 数据分析采用 t 检验、曼-惠特尼检验和卡方检验。 A 组 FICB 30 分钟后的 NRS 评分为 2.36 ± 1.11,低于 B 组的 3.28 ± 0.94(P = 0.002)。A 组定位时的 NRS 评分为 2.16 ± 0.90,低于 B 组的 3.08 ± 0.81(P = 0. 0004)。A 组的闭孔神经分布阻滞覆盖率为 0.76 ± 0.52,B 组为 0.16 ± 0.37(P < 0.001)。镇痛总持续时间为 493.40 ± 214.83 分钟,A 组为 367.48 ± 63.92 分钟(P = 0.007),B 组为 367.48 ± 63.92 分钟(P = 0.007)。恢复质量(QoR)满分为 150 分,A 组为 120.60 ± 8.91 分,B 组为 110.40 ± 7.59 分(P < 0.001)。 与腹股沟下入路相比,采用腹股沟上入路进行 FICB 可提供更好的镇痛效果、感觉阻滞覆盖范围和脊髓麻醉定位条件,而且首次抢救镇痛药需求时间更长,恢复质量更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block versus Single-shot Adductor Canal Block Using Ropivacaine for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodistention with Corticosteroid Instillation in Glenohumeral Joint for Relief in Frozen Shoulder: A Case Series Hypervitaminosis D Due to Overdose: A Case Series A Comparative Study of Ultrasound Guided erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Anaesthetic Infiltration in Spine Surgeries for Intraoperative and Post-operative Analgesia Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Postdural Puncture Headache: A Less Trodden Path
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1