{"title":"A leadless pacemaker implantation for a patient with systemic right ventricle under ventricular assist device support","authors":"Kohsaku Goto MD , Toshiya Kojima MD, PhD, FJCC , Tsukasa Oshima MD, PhD , Akihito Saito MD, PhD , Yu Shimizu MD, PhD , Katsura Soma MD, PhD, FJCC , Yukiteru Nakayama MD, PhD , Eriko Hasumi MD, PhD , Ryo Inuzuka MD, PhD , Masahiko Ando MD, PhD, MPH , Eisuke Amiya MD, PhD , Katsuhito Fujiu MD, PhD , Yasutaka Hirata MD, PhD , Masaru Hatano MD, PhD, FJCC , Minoru Ono MD, PhD, FJCC , Issei Komuro MD, PhD, FJCC","doi":"10.1016/j.jccase.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) often develop complete atrioventricular block and heart failure due to the abnormal disposition of atrioventricular node and disadvantage of systemic right ventricle. These issues are managed with a pacing system and a ventricular assist device (VAD), respectively. While technological advances offer new treatment strategies, the simultaneous deployment of a leadless pacemaker and a VAD in cases of ccTGA remains unexplored. Here, we present a case of leadless pacemaker implantation for a VAD-supported ccTGA patient. The safety of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle and electromagnetic interference between devices are major concerns when implanting a leadless pacemaker; however, the current case overcomes these obstacles. There were no perioperative complications, and both devices were functioning without problems during a one-year follow up. We expect that, even in patients with cardiac complexity such as systemic right ventricle under VAD support, a leadless pacemaker could become the treatment of choice if the indication is appropriate, although careful and close follow up is needed.</p></div><div><h3>Learning objective</h3><p>Technological advances expand treatment strategies and provide significant benefits to patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, discussion of the combination of a leadless pacemaker and a ventricular assist device (VAD) is rare. We demonstrated the efficacy of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle in a patient with systemic right ventricle on VAD. This approach could be an option even for ACHD patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","volume":"29 6","pages":"Pages 244-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878540924000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) often develop complete atrioventricular block and heart failure due to the abnormal disposition of atrioventricular node and disadvantage of systemic right ventricle. These issues are managed with a pacing system and a ventricular assist device (VAD), respectively. While technological advances offer new treatment strategies, the simultaneous deployment of a leadless pacemaker and a VAD in cases of ccTGA remains unexplored. Here, we present a case of leadless pacemaker implantation for a VAD-supported ccTGA patient. The safety of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle and electromagnetic interference between devices are major concerns when implanting a leadless pacemaker; however, the current case overcomes these obstacles. There were no perioperative complications, and both devices were functioning without problems during a one-year follow up. We expect that, even in patients with cardiac complexity such as systemic right ventricle under VAD support, a leadless pacemaker could become the treatment of choice if the indication is appropriate, although careful and close follow up is needed.
Learning objective
Technological advances expand treatment strategies and provide significant benefits to patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, discussion of the combination of a leadless pacemaker and a ventricular assist device (VAD) is rare. We demonstrated the efficacy of a leadless pacemaker for a subpulmonary left ventricle in a patient with systemic right ventricle on VAD. This approach could be an option even for ACHD patients.
先天性大动脉转位矫正术(ccTGA)患者由于房室结位置异常和系统性右心室的劣势,往往会出现完全性房室传导阻滞和心力衰竭。这些问题可分别通过起搏系统和心室辅助装置(VAD)来解决。尽管技术进步提供了新的治疗策略,但在ccTGA病例中同时部署无导联起搏器和VAD的方法仍未得到探讨。在此,我们介绍了一例为 VAD 支持的 ccTGA 患者植入无导联起搏器的病例。为肺下左心室植入无引线起搏器的安全性和设备之间的电磁干扰是植入无引线起搏器时的主要顾虑;然而,本病例克服了这些障碍。围手术期未出现并发症,两个装置在一年的随访中均正常运行。我们预计,即使是心脏情况复杂的患者,如接受 VAD 支持的系统性右心室患者,如果适应症合适,无导联起搏器也可能成为首选治疗方法,但仍需进行仔细和密切的随访。学习目标技术进步拓展了治疗策略,为成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者带来了巨大的益处。然而,关于无导线起搏器与心室辅助装置(VAD)结合使用的讨论并不多见。我们证明了无导联起搏器对使用 VAD 的全身性右心室患者肺下左心室的疗效。即使是 ACHD 患者也可以选择这种方法。