Article: Equity Crowdfunding and Mini-Bonds: A Tool for the Economic Recovery of SMEs: Ratio, Dangers and Prospective in the UK and Italian Jurisdictions
{"title":"Article: Equity Crowdfunding and Mini-Bonds: A Tool for the Economic Recovery of SMEs: Ratio, Dangers and Prospective in the UK and Italian Jurisdictions","authors":"Mario Alcaro Falchi Delitala","doi":"10.54648/eulr2024011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper, after briefly outlining what mini-bonds and equity crowdfunding platforms consist, will deal with the regulations in the UK and in Italy to regulate the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms in a second chapter, outlining the similarities and divergences of methods and purposes with which they were conceived in the two countries. In a third chapter the advantages and disadvantages with regard not only to the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms for SMEs that issue mini-bonds, but also for consumers will be analysed. Finally, in the last chapter the author will try to clarify and justify the ban by the FCA to retail investors for purchase of “speculative illiquid securities” also due to the numerous scandals that occurred in the UK, but at the same time, proposals will be put forward aimed at better regulating the phenomenon and encouraging the use of this alternative financial instrument.\nMini-bonds, crowdfunding, alternative finance, fintech, financial technologies, comparative law, SMEs, economic policies, Italian jurisdiction, UK jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":"41 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2024011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The following paper, after briefly outlining what mini-bonds and equity crowdfunding platforms consist, will deal with the regulations in the UK and in Italy to regulate the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms in a second chapter, outlining the similarities and divergences of methods and purposes with which they were conceived in the two countries. In a third chapter the advantages and disadvantages with regard not only to the placement of mini-bonds through crowdfunding platforms for SMEs that issue mini-bonds, but also for consumers will be analysed. Finally, in the last chapter the author will try to clarify and justify the ban by the FCA to retail investors for purchase of “speculative illiquid securities” also due to the numerous scandals that occurred in the UK, but at the same time, proposals will be put forward aimed at better regulating the phenomenon and encouraging the use of this alternative financial instrument.
Mini-bonds, crowdfunding, alternative finance, fintech, financial technologies, comparative law, SMEs, economic policies, Italian jurisdiction, UK jurisdiction.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.