Topical phenytoin improves wound healing with analgesic and antibacterial properties and minimal side effects: a systematic review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.25270/wnds/23105
Kaiser O Sadiq, Yogamba M Shivakumar, E. Burra, Kamran Shahid, Yonas Tamene, Shefali P. Mody, T. S. Nath
{"title":"Topical phenytoin improves wound healing with analgesic and antibacterial properties and minimal side effects: a systematic review.","authors":"Kaiser O Sadiq, Yogamba M Shivakumar, E. Burra, Kamran Shahid, Yonas Tamene, Shefali P. Mody, T. S. Nath","doi":"10.25270/wnds/23105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAlthough phenytoin's potential benefits in wound healing, pain relief, and infection control across various wound types have been previously reported, its use in wound care remains limited.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo conduct a comprehensive review to assess the efficacy of topical phenytoin compared with standard and alternative treatments for different wound types.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe authors last searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MEDLINE in June 2023. All English-language human RCTs and NRCTs from any time were included. The RoB 2 was used to assess quality of randomized trials, and the ROBINS-I was used to assess the quality of nonrandomized trials. Studies with a low risk of bias or some concerns in no more than 1 domain were included. Data collected and analyzed included wound type, interventions, sample size, outcome measures, and adverse effects.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe search yielded 101 studies, of which 17 RCTs and 8 NRCTs were eligible for inclusion. Of the included studies, 56% had a low risk of bias in all domains. The sample sizes varied between 20 and 130 (median, 60), with a total sample size of 1653 patients. Phenytoin improved wound healing in 17 of the 24 studies that evaluated it (71%), increased granulation tissue in 9 of the 10 studies that evaluated it (90%), provided analgesic effects in 7 of the 13 studies that evaluated it (54%), and inhibited bacterial contaminants in 6 of the 8 studies that evaluated it (75%). Adverse effects were rare (29%), minimal, and transient.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPhenytoin enhances wound healing and offers analgesic and antibacterial properties with minimal adverse effects. Further research is needed on optimal dosage of phenytoin, as well as frequency, delivery vehicles, and effects on other postoperative wounds.\n\n\nBACKGROUND\nAlthough phenytoin's potential benefits in wound healing, pain relief, and infection control across various wound types have been previously reported, its use in wound care remains limited.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nTo conduct a comprehensive review to assess the efficacy of topical phenytoin compared with standard and alternative treatments for different wound types.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThe authors last searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MEDLINE in June 2023. All English-language human RCTs and NRCTs from any time were included. The RoB 2 was used to assess quality of randomized trials, and the ROBINS-I was used to assess the quality of nonrandomized trials. Studies with a low risk of bias or some concerns in no more than 1 domain were included. Data collected and analyzed included wound type, interventions, sample size, outcome measures, and adverse effects.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe search yielded 101 studies, of which 17 RCTs and 8 NRCTs were eligible for inclusion. Of the included studies, 56% had a low risk of bias in all domains. The sample sizes varied between 20 and 130 (median, 60), with a total sample size of 1653 patients. Phenytoin improved wound healing in 17 of the 24 studies that evaluated it (71%), increased granulation tissue in 9 of the 10 studies that evaluated it (90%), provided analgesic effects in 7 of the 13 studies that evaluated it (54%), and inhibited bacterial contaminants in 6 of the 8 studies that evaluated it (75%). Adverse effects were rare (29%), minimal, and transient.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPhenytoin enhances wound healing and offers analgesic and antibacterial properties with minimal adverse effects. Further research is needed on optimal dosage of phenytoin, as well as frequency, delivery vehicles, and effects on other postoperative wounds.","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/23105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although phenytoin's potential benefits in wound healing, pain relief, and infection control across various wound types have been previously reported, its use in wound care remains limited. OBJECTIVE To conduct a comprehensive review to assess the efficacy of topical phenytoin compared with standard and alternative treatments for different wound types. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors last searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MEDLINE in June 2023. All English-language human RCTs and NRCTs from any time were included. The RoB 2 was used to assess quality of randomized trials, and the ROBINS-I was used to assess the quality of nonrandomized trials. Studies with a low risk of bias or some concerns in no more than 1 domain were included. Data collected and analyzed included wound type, interventions, sample size, outcome measures, and adverse effects. RESULTS The search yielded 101 studies, of which 17 RCTs and 8 NRCTs were eligible for inclusion. Of the included studies, 56% had a low risk of bias in all domains. The sample sizes varied between 20 and 130 (median, 60), with a total sample size of 1653 patients. Phenytoin improved wound healing in 17 of the 24 studies that evaluated it (71%), increased granulation tissue in 9 of the 10 studies that evaluated it (90%), provided analgesic effects in 7 of the 13 studies that evaluated it (54%), and inhibited bacterial contaminants in 6 of the 8 studies that evaluated it (75%). Adverse effects were rare (29%), minimal, and transient. CONCLUSION Phenytoin enhances wound healing and offers analgesic and antibacterial properties with minimal adverse effects. Further research is needed on optimal dosage of phenytoin, as well as frequency, delivery vehicles, and effects on other postoperative wounds. BACKGROUND Although phenytoin's potential benefits in wound healing, pain relief, and infection control across various wound types have been previously reported, its use in wound care remains limited. OBJECTIVE To conduct a comprehensive review to assess the efficacy of topical phenytoin compared with standard and alternative treatments for different wound types. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors last searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, PubMed Central, and MEDLINE in June 2023. All English-language human RCTs and NRCTs from any time were included. The RoB 2 was used to assess quality of randomized trials, and the ROBINS-I was used to assess the quality of nonrandomized trials. Studies with a low risk of bias or some concerns in no more than 1 domain were included. Data collected and analyzed included wound type, interventions, sample size, outcome measures, and adverse effects. RESULTS The search yielded 101 studies, of which 17 RCTs and 8 NRCTs were eligible for inclusion. Of the included studies, 56% had a low risk of bias in all domains. The sample sizes varied between 20 and 130 (median, 60), with a total sample size of 1653 patients. Phenytoin improved wound healing in 17 of the 24 studies that evaluated it (71%), increased granulation tissue in 9 of the 10 studies that evaluated it (90%), provided analgesic effects in 7 of the 13 studies that evaluated it (54%), and inhibited bacterial contaminants in 6 of the 8 studies that evaluated it (75%). Adverse effects were rare (29%), minimal, and transient. CONCLUSION Phenytoin enhances wound healing and offers analgesic and antibacterial properties with minimal adverse effects. Further research is needed on optimal dosage of phenytoin, as well as frequency, delivery vehicles, and effects on other postoperative wounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部使用苯妥英可改善伤口愈合,具有镇痛和抗菌特性,且副作用极小:一项系统综述。
材料和方法作者于 2023 年 6 月对 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、PubMed Central 和 MEDLINE 进行了最后一次检索。纳入了任何时间的所有英语人类 RCT 和 NRCT。RoB 2 用于评估随机试验的质量,ROBINS-I 用于评估非随机试验的质量。偏倚风险较低或在不超过一个领域存在一些问题的研究均被纳入。收集和分析的数据包括伤口类型、干预措施、样本大小、结果测量和不良反应等。结果搜索结果显示有 101 项研究,其中 17 项 RCT 和 8 项 NRCT 符合纳入条件。在纳入的研究中,56%的研究在所有方面的偏倚风险都较低。样本量从20到130不等(中位数为60),总样本量为1653名患者。在对苯妥英进行评估的 24 项研究中,17 项研究(71%)改善了伤口愈合;在对苯妥英进行评估的 10 项研究中,9 项研究(90%)增加了肉芽组织;在对苯妥英进行评估的 13 项研究中,7 项研究(54%)提供了镇痛效果;在对苯妥英进行评估的 8 项研究中,6 项研究(75%)抑制了细菌污染。苯妥英可促进伤口愈合,具有镇痛和抗菌作用,且不良反应极少。关于苯妥英的最佳剂量、使用频率、给药载体以及对其他术后伤口的影响,还需要进一步的研究。材料与方法作者于 2023 年 6 月最后一次检索了 Cochrane Library、PubMed、PubMed Central 和 MEDLINE。纳入了任何时间的所有英语人类 RCT 和 NRCT。RoB 2 用于评估随机试验的质量,ROBINS-I 用于评估非随机试验的质量。偏倚风险较低或在不超过一个领域存在一些问题的研究均被纳入。收集和分析的数据包括伤口类型、干预措施、样本大小、结果测量和不良反应等。结果搜索结果显示有 101 项研究,其中 17 项 RCT 和 8 项 NRCT 符合纳入条件。在纳入的研究中,56%的研究在所有方面的偏倚风险都较低。样本量从20到130不等(中位数为60),总样本量为1653名患者。在对苯妥英进行评估的 24 项研究中,17 项研究(71%)改善了伤口愈合;在对苯妥英进行评估的 10 项研究中,9 项研究(90%)增加了肉芽组织;在对苯妥英进行评估的 13 项研究中,7 项研究(54%)提供了镇痛效果;在对苯妥英进行评估的 8 项研究中,6 项研究(75%)抑制了细菌污染。苯妥英可促进伤口愈合,具有镇痛和抗菌作用,且不良反应极少。关于苯妥英的最佳剂量、频率、给药载体以及对其他术后伤口的影响,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Diving deep into healing: the promising role of fish skin in wound recovery. Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evaluating the number of cellular and/or tissue-based product applications required to treat diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers in non-hospital outpatient department settings. Skin cancer or locally advanced mammary carcinoma: a discussion of cutaneous pathology on the male chest. Use of silver collagen oxidized regenerated cellulose dressings in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy: expert panel consensus recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1