Qualitative Analysis of Sanitation Management in Residential Area around Gampong Jawa Landfill in 2021 Based on Fly Distribution Pattern

Muhammad Nur, M. Sarong, M. Mudatsir, Marlina Marlina, Muhammad Sayuthi
{"title":"Qualitative Analysis of Sanitation Management in Residential Area around Gampong Jawa Landfill in 2021 Based on Fly Distribution Pattern","authors":"Muhammad Nur, M. Sarong, M. Mudatsir, Marlina Marlina, Muhammad Sayuthi","doi":"10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Residents are concerned about the presence of flies, especially in areas near landfills, so it is important to study the distribution patterns of fly communities and community responses to the presence of flies. This study focuses on two main topics: fly distribution in various zones and people’s perspectives on fly prevention initiatives.\n \n \n \n Data were collected by dividing the sampling location into four clusters and collecting data three times per day (morning, noon, and afternoon). Flypaper was used to collect the insects, which were then separated based on their morphology. The data were tabulated and analyzed using the Shannon-Wiener equation for the diversity index, and the Morisita index equation for the distribution pattern. The observation was then continued by asking people about the existence of the fly community.\n \n \n \n Cluster 4 has the strongest dynamics with varying absolute density. The morning has the highest absolute density, with an average of 26.56. The findings of the relative density analysis suggest that Musca domestica has the highest percentage, with an average percentage of 74.36%. Only 45% of respondents took actions to combat the presence of flies. The study’s findings also revealed that 97% of the population had never been socialized about sanitary management and attempts to control fly communities.\n \n \n \n Community sanitation, the prevalence of trash, and the presence of insects are not successfully regulated. The residential sector of the Gampong Jawa Community, which has the most direct access to the landfill, is at a higher risk of getting affected by hazardous diseases conveyed by flies.\n","PeriodicalId":36322,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering","volume":"879 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijehe.ijehe_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residents are concerned about the presence of flies, especially in areas near landfills, so it is important to study the distribution patterns of fly communities and community responses to the presence of flies. This study focuses on two main topics: fly distribution in various zones and people’s perspectives on fly prevention initiatives. Data were collected by dividing the sampling location into four clusters and collecting data three times per day (morning, noon, and afternoon). Flypaper was used to collect the insects, which were then separated based on their morphology. The data were tabulated and analyzed using the Shannon-Wiener equation for the diversity index, and the Morisita index equation for the distribution pattern. The observation was then continued by asking people about the existence of the fly community. Cluster 4 has the strongest dynamics with varying absolute density. The morning has the highest absolute density, with an average of 26.56. The findings of the relative density analysis suggest that Musca domestica has the highest percentage, with an average percentage of 74.36%. Only 45% of respondents took actions to combat the presence of flies. The study’s findings also revealed that 97% of the population had never been socialized about sanitary management and attempts to control fly communities. Community sanitation, the prevalence of trash, and the presence of insects are not successfully regulated. The residential sector of the Gampong Jawa Community, which has the most direct access to the landfill, is at a higher risk of getting affected by hazardous diseases conveyed by flies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于苍蝇分布模式的 2021 年甘榜贾瓦垃圾填埋场周边居民区卫生管理定性分析
居民对苍蝇的存在感到担忧,尤其是在垃圾填埋场附近地区,因此研究苍蝇群落的分布模式和社区对苍蝇存在的反应非常重要。本研究主要关注两个主题:苍蝇在不同区域的分布情况和人们对苍蝇预防措施的看法。 数据收集方法是将取样地点分为四个群组,每天收集三次数据(上午、中午和下午)。使用捕蝇纸收集昆虫,然后根据昆虫的形态进行分类。采用香农-维纳方程(Shannon-Wiener equation)计算多样性指数,采用莫里西塔指数方程(Morisita index equation)计算分布模式,将数据制成表格并进行分析。然后继续观察,向人们询问苍蝇群落的存在情况。 第 4 组动态最强,绝对密度各不相同。早晨的绝对密度最高,平均为 26.56。相对密度分析结果表明,家蝇的比例最高,平均比例为 74.36%。只有 45% 的受访者采取了应对苍蝇的行动。研究结果还显示,97% 的人从未接受过有关卫生管理和试图控制苍蝇群落的社会教育。 社区卫生、垃圾的普遍存在以及昆虫的存在都没有得到成功治理。Gampong Jawa 社区的居民区最直接接触垃圾填埋场,受苍蝇传播的有害疾病影响的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determining Kidney Damage Risk Factors Associated with Urine Paraquat Levels and Biochemical Urine Profile of Farmers in Banjarbaru, South Kalimantan, Indonesia Genotoxicity in Analog and Smart Mobile Phone Users by Assessing Micronuclei in Oral Exfoliated Cells – A Comparative Study Identifying and Prioritizing the Indicators Influencing the Performance of the Permit-to-work System Using Hybrid Fuzzy Delphi Method - Improve Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study Water Quality Index of Arkavathi River and Surrounding Groundwater Fractional Order Predictive Proportional Integral Control of pH in Effluents of Industrial Plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1