Pain management after hip fracture repair surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.56126/75.1.04
S. Pissens, L. Cavens, G. P. Joshi, M.P. Bonnet, A. Sauter, J. Raeder, M. Van de Velde
{"title":"Pain management after hip fracture repair surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations","authors":"S. Pissens, L. Cavens, G. P. Joshi, M.P. Bonnet, A. Sauter, J. Raeder, M. Van de Velde","doi":"10.56126/75.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hip fracture is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and length of stay. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after hip fracture. A systematic review utilising procedure specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the English language between 04 April 2005 and 12 May 2021, evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. A total of 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients having hip fracture, pre, intra and postoperative paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX-2 inhibitors are recommended. A single shot femoral nerve block or a single shot fascia iliaca compartment block are recommended. Continuous catheter techniques should be used only in specific circumstances. The choice between femoral nerve block or a fascia iliaca compartment block should be made according to local expertise. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors with opioids used for rescue. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations, while other interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/75.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hip fracture is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain, which can influence postoperative recovery and length of stay. The aim of this systematic review was to update the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after hip fracture. A systematic review utilising procedure specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in the English language between 04 April 2005 and 12 May 2021, evaluating the effects of analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. A total of 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. For patients having hip fracture, pre, intra and postoperative paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX-2 inhibitors are recommended. A single shot femoral nerve block or a single shot fascia iliaca compartment block are recommended. Continuous catheter techniques should be used only in specific circumstances. The choice between femoral nerve block or a fascia iliaca compartment block should be made according to local expertise. The postoperative regimen should include regular paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors with opioids used for rescue. Some of the interventions, although effective, carry risks, and consequentially were omitted from the recommendations, while other interventions were not recommended due to insufficient, inconsistent or lack of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋部骨折修复手术后的疼痛管理:系统回顾和特定手术术后疼痛管理 (PROSPECT) 建议
髋部骨折与中度至重度术后疼痛有关,会影响术后恢复和住院时间。本系统性综述旨在更新现有文献,并为髋部骨折术后的最佳疼痛管理提出建议。采用特定手术术后疼痛管理(PROSPECT)方法进行了系统性回顾。研究人员从 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索了 2005 年 4 月 4 日至 2021 年 5 月 12 日期间用英语发表的、评估镇痛、麻醉和手术干预效果的随机对照试验、系统综述和荟萃分析。共有 60 项研究符合纳入标准。对于髋部骨折患者,建议在术前、术中和术后使用扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎药或 COX-2 抑制剂。建议采用单次股神经阻滞或单次髂筋膜室阻滞。只有在特殊情况下才能使用连续导管技术。选择股神经阻滞还是髂筋膜室阻滞,应根据当地的专业知识而定。术后治疗方案应包括常规扑热息痛、非甾体抗炎药和 COX-2 抑制剂,阿片类药物用于抢救。有些干预措施虽然有效,但存在风险,因此在建议中被省略,而其他干预措施则因证据不足、不一致或缺乏证据而未被推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
期刊最新文献
Long-term cognitive dysfunction after COVID ARDS Trends in female authorship in Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica from 2005 to 2021 General anesthesia for maternal surgery during pregnancy: dogmas, myths and evidence, a narrative review Clinical relevance of nocebo effects in anesthesia practice: a narrative review Gender equality and equity in anaesthesia research: Why are we still talking about numbers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1