Multiple diagnoses in the context of parallel epidemics: methamphetamine, opioid use disorder and psychiatric conditions

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-09-2023-0076
Taylor Zande, Albert M. Kopak, Norman G Hoffmann
{"title":"Multiple diagnoses in the context of parallel epidemics: methamphetamine, opioid use disorder and psychiatric conditions","authors":"Taylor Zande, Albert M. Kopak, Norman G Hoffmann","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-09-2023-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe most recent wave of the opioid epidemic in the USA has been complicated by a sharp increase in methamphetamine use. In addition, many people classified with opioid use disorder (OUD) and methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) present indications of psychiatric conditions. These diagnoses are also highly prevalent among people who are admitted to jails, but research conducted with this population is limited, due in part to the challenges associated with gaining access to local detention centers. This paper aims to examine the patterns of psychiatric conditions, OUD, and MUD among an understudied population to help inform the development of service delivery systems.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe present study was designed to assess the prevalence of OUD, MUD and common psychiatric conditions in a large sample of adults (n = 846) collected from four local jails. Diagnostic patterns were evaluated according to the current criteria established in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed; American Psychiatric Association, 2013).\n\n\nFindings\nMore than half (57.3%) of the sample met criteria for MUD, one-third (37.2%) exceeded the threshold for an OUD diagnosis and 15.7% were classified with both conditions. Participants who met criteria for both MUD and OUD were significantly more likely to experience symptoms of major depression [adjusted odd ratios (aOR) = 1.76, 9, confidence intervals (CI) = 1.16–2.67], post-traumatic stress disorder (aOR = 2.51, 1.64–3.83), panic attacks (aOR = 3.24, 95% CI = 2.05–5.13), obsessive compulsive disorder (aOR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.66–4.51) and antisocial personality (aOR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.97–4.64).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThese results, which were derived from an understudied population of adults detained in local jails, indicate the co-–occurrence of MUD and OUD are associated with certain psychiatric conditions.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-09-2023-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The most recent wave of the opioid epidemic in the USA has been complicated by a sharp increase in methamphetamine use. In addition, many people classified with opioid use disorder (OUD) and methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) present indications of psychiatric conditions. These diagnoses are also highly prevalent among people who are admitted to jails, but research conducted with this population is limited, due in part to the challenges associated with gaining access to local detention centers. This paper aims to examine the patterns of psychiatric conditions, OUD, and MUD among an understudied population to help inform the development of service delivery systems. Design/methodology/approach The present study was designed to assess the prevalence of OUD, MUD and common psychiatric conditions in a large sample of adults (n = 846) collected from four local jails. Diagnostic patterns were evaluated according to the current criteria established in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Findings More than half (57.3%) of the sample met criteria for MUD, one-third (37.2%) exceeded the threshold for an OUD diagnosis and 15.7% were classified with both conditions. Participants who met criteria for both MUD and OUD were significantly more likely to experience symptoms of major depression [adjusted odd ratios (aOR) = 1.76, 9, confidence intervals (CI) = 1.16–2.67], post-traumatic stress disorder (aOR = 2.51, 1.64–3.83), panic attacks (aOR = 3.24, 95% CI = 2.05–5.13), obsessive compulsive disorder (aOR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.66–4.51) and antisocial personality (aOR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.97–4.64). Originality/value These results, which were derived from an understudied population of adults detained in local jails, indicate the co-–occurrence of MUD and OUD are associated with certain psychiatric conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并行流行病背景下的多重诊断:甲基苯丙胺、阿片类药物使用障碍和精神疾病
目的美国最近的阿片类药物流行病浪潮因甲基苯丙胺使用的急剧增加而变得更加复杂。此外,许多被归类为阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)和甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)的人都有精神病症状。这些诊断在被收进监狱的人群中也很普遍,但针对这一人群的研究却很有限,部分原因是与进入当地拘留中心相关的挑战。本研究旨在评估从四个地方监狱收集的大量成人样本(n = 846)中 OUD、MUD 和常见精神疾病的患病率。根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第 5 版;美国精神病学协会,2013 年)中规定的现行标准对诊断模式进行了评估。研究结果 超过半数(57.3%)的样本符合 MUD 的标准,三分之一(37.2%)的样本超过了 OUD 诊断的阈值,15.7% 的样本同时患有这两种疾病。同时符合 MUD 和 OUD 标准的参与者更有可能出现重度抑郁症状[调整后奇数比 (aOR) = 1.76,9,置信区间 (CI) = 1.16-2.67]、创伤后应激障碍 (aOR = 2.51,1.64-3.83)、惊恐发作 (aOR = 3.24,95% CI = 2.05-5.13)、强迫症 (aOR = 2.51,1.64-3.83)。原创性/价值这些结果来自于当地监狱中未得到充分研究的成年人群体,它们表明 MUD 和 OUD 的共同发生与某些精神疾病有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Perinatal depression screening by health cadres in Indonesia: EPDS or Whooley? Perinatal depression screening by health cadres in Indonesia: EPDS or Whooley? A community center to mobilize public policies and human rights in mental health: “the door is always open” Editorial: International perspectives in public mental health Mental Health First Aid™ for Deaf communities: responses to a lack of national Deaf mental health service provision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1