Shelter in Place

ACME Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.7202/1109049ar
Amanda De Lisio, Caroline Fusco, Steph Woodworth, Raiya Taha-Thomure
{"title":"Shelter in Place","authors":"Amanda De Lisio, Caroline Fusco, Steph Woodworth, Raiya Taha-Thomure","doi":"10.7202/1109049ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we interrogate the representation and construction of public park space in a settler colonial city: Toronto/Tkaronto. First, we draw on the relationship between urban neoliberalism and prudentialism to demonstrate the way public health authorities in Toronto/Tkaronto promoted a neoliberal ideology of prudentialism that emphasized individual action (e.g., social distancing, personal hygiene, sheltering in place) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, we consider the extent to which this response congealed and combined with broader anxieties that were used to manage more than the virus. We focus specifically on the way these anxieties took hold in public park space, and in particular the response to encampment communities. We theorize prudentialism, as an instrument of the white settler state, to interrogate the twin processes of organized abandonment and organized violence (Gilmore 2022), which were made visible in the treatment of unhoused people amidst the pandemic in an affluent and seemingly progressive city in a nation now known as Canada. Recognizing that COVID-19 has afflicted global cities marred by real estate speculation and the continual reliance on the commodification of Indigenous Land, which has made homelessness and urban displacement a lived condition for some, we argue that public health crises result not from—and thereby cannot be solved by—prudential responsibilization, but from the willful ignorance of the neoliberal, capitalist white settler [real estate] state (Stein 2019).","PeriodicalId":39706,"journal":{"name":"ACME","volume":"377 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1109049ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we interrogate the representation and construction of public park space in a settler colonial city: Toronto/Tkaronto. First, we draw on the relationship between urban neoliberalism and prudentialism to demonstrate the way public health authorities in Toronto/Tkaronto promoted a neoliberal ideology of prudentialism that emphasized individual action (e.g., social distancing, personal hygiene, sheltering in place) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, we consider the extent to which this response congealed and combined with broader anxieties that were used to manage more than the virus. We focus specifically on the way these anxieties took hold in public park space, and in particular the response to encampment communities. We theorize prudentialism, as an instrument of the white settler state, to interrogate the twin processes of organized abandonment and organized violence (Gilmore 2022), which were made visible in the treatment of unhoused people amidst the pandemic in an affluent and seemingly progressive city in a nation now known as Canada. Recognizing that COVID-19 has afflicted global cities marred by real estate speculation and the continual reliance on the commodification of Indigenous Land, which has made homelessness and urban displacement a lived condition for some, we argue that public health crises result not from—and thereby cannot be solved by—prudential responsibilization, but from the willful ignorance of the neoliberal, capitalist white settler [real estate] state (Stein 2019).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
就地避难
在这篇文章中,我们对殖民定居城市中公共公园空间的表现和建设进行了探讨:多伦多/特卡伦托。首先,我们借鉴城市新自由主义与审慎主义之间的关系,展示多伦多/特卡伦托的公共卫生当局是如何推广新自由主义的审慎主义意识形态的,这种意识形态强调个人行动(如社会疏离、个人卫生、就地避难)以应对 COVID-19 大流行。其次,我们考虑了这种应对措施在多大程度上与更广泛的焦虑凝结和结合在一起,而这些焦虑不仅仅用于管理病毒。我们特别关注这些焦虑在公园公共空间中的表现,尤其是对露营社区的反应。作为白人定居者国家的工具,我们将审慎主义理论化,以审视有组织的遗弃和有组织的暴力这两个过程(吉尔莫尔,2022 年)。我们认识到,COVID-19肆虐的全球城市受到房地产投机和对土著土地商品化的持续依赖的影响,这使得无家可归和城市流离失所成为一些人的生活状态,因此我们认为,公共卫生危机不是由审慎的责任造成的,因此也不能通过审慎的责任来解决,而是由新自由主义、资本主义白人定居者[房地产]国家的故意无知造成的(Stein 2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACME
ACME Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ACME is an on-line international journal for critical and radical analyses of the social, the spatial and the political. The journal"s purpose is to provide a forum for the publication of critical and radical work about space in the social sciences - including anarchist, anti-racist, environmentalist, feminist, Marxist, non-representational, postcolonial, poststructuralist, queer, situationist and socialist perspectives. Analyses that are critical and radical are understood to be part of the praxis of social and political change aimed at challenging, dismantling, and transforming prevalent relations, systems, and structures of capitalist exploitation, oppression, imperialism, neo-liberalism, national aggression, and environmental destruction.
期刊最新文献
myth of mankind and the representation of people in Late 18th-century British dictionaries of trade and commerce Prometeo e il destino nel nome: [Aesch.] Pr. 86 Romolo divino, Romolo fatto a pezzi. L’uso politico del mito della scomparsa del primo re alla fine della Repubblica Rosa Calzecchi Onesti studiosa di varianti d’autore Ripartenza postbellica in due mostre a Roma, in Palazzo Venezia, negli anni 1944 e 1945
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1