A Reliability-Based Assessment Framework For Drag Anchors

Michael O'Neill, Andrew Grime, M. F. Bransby, Phillip Watson, James Whelan
{"title":"A Reliability-Based Assessment Framework For Drag Anchors","authors":"Michael O'Neill, Andrew Grime, M. F. Bransby, Phillip Watson, James Whelan","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drag anchors are often employed in offshore floating facility moorings. The standard drag anchor design approach is based on a deterministic Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) framework that considers characteristic design ‘low’ and ‘high’ estimates of soil strength and other geotechnical parameters, combined with code-specified partial factors. A disadvantage of this approach is that the resulting anchor designs may not achieve a consistent level of reliability. This paper describes a study that addresses this limitation by developing and demonstrating a generalised drag anchor probability of failure analysis framework for inclusion in a Reliability Based Assessment (RBA) of a mooring. A feature of the study is the inclusion of consolidation and cyclic loading effects in the anchor analysis. The study highlights the benefits an RBA approach can offer to the drag anchor design process, including reduced anchor size and preloading requirements, and increased confidence in the anchor design and estimate of anchor performance. For temporarily moored facilities this approach offers the potential to exploit expanded weather windows for operations. For permanently moored floating offshore wind developments this approach may allow adoption of reduced levels of target reliability, thereby reducing costs for systems with a large number of anchors.","PeriodicalId":505159,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":"225 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drag anchors are often employed in offshore floating facility moorings. The standard drag anchor design approach is based on a deterministic Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) framework that considers characteristic design ‘low’ and ‘high’ estimates of soil strength and other geotechnical parameters, combined with code-specified partial factors. A disadvantage of this approach is that the resulting anchor designs may not achieve a consistent level of reliability. This paper describes a study that addresses this limitation by developing and demonstrating a generalised drag anchor probability of failure analysis framework for inclusion in a Reliability Based Assessment (RBA) of a mooring. A feature of the study is the inclusion of consolidation and cyclic loading effects in the anchor analysis. The study highlights the benefits an RBA approach can offer to the drag anchor design process, including reduced anchor size and preloading requirements, and increased confidence in the anchor design and estimate of anchor performance. For temporarily moored facilities this approach offers the potential to exploit expanded weather windows for operations. For permanently moored floating offshore wind developments this approach may allow adoption of reduced levels of target reliability, thereby reducing costs for systems with a large number of anchors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于可靠性的拖曳锚评估框架
拖锚通常用于海上浮动设施系泊。标准的拖拉锚设计方法基于确定性载荷和阻力系数设计(LRFD)框架,该框架考虑了土壤强度和其他岩土参数的特征设计 "低 "和 "高 "估计值,并结合了规范指定的部分系数。这种方法的缺点是,由此产生的锚固设计可能无法达到一致的可靠性水平。本文介绍了一项针对这一局限性的研究,该研究开发并演示了一个通用的拖曳锚失效概率分析框架,可用于对系泊进行基于可靠性的评估(RBA)。该研究的一个特点是将固结和循环载荷效应纳入锚泊分析。该研究强调了基于可靠性评估的方法可为拖曳锚设计过程带来的好处,包括减少锚的尺寸和预加载要求,以及提高对锚设计和锚性能估计的信心。对于临时停泊的设施来说,这种方法为利用更多的天气窗口进行操作提供了可能性。对于永久停泊的浮式海上风电开发项目,这种方法可以降低目标可靠性水平,从而降低拥有大量锚的系统的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strength and Dilatancy of Crushable Soils With Different Gradings Physical model case study: treatment effect of soft ground by vacuum preloading combined with liquid bag pressurization method Discussion of “Investigation of soil setup effects on pile response in clay considering over-consolidation ratio and installation method through physical modeling” Numerical investigation on the pullout capacity of suction caissons in silty sand-over-clay deposit Three-dimensional voxel geological modelling for subsurface stratigraphy: A graph convolutional network approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1