The Use of Physical Strength in Children’s Education: Learning from Indonesian Court’s Judgments

Q3 Social Sciences Sriwijaya Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.3014.pp115-132
Eva Achjani Zulfa, Artha Febriansyah, Jelang Ramadhan, I. Hayatullah
{"title":"The Use of Physical Strength in Children’s Education: Learning from Indonesian Court’s Judgments","authors":"Eva Achjani Zulfa, Artha Febriansyah, Jelang Ramadhan, I. Hayatullah","doi":"10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.3014.pp115-132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the limitations of using physical force in educating children in Indonesia. It examines the prevalence of violence by parents and teachers in education. Increased public awareness and concern for children's rights have made the use of violence in education a taboo. This research uses a qualitative method with secondary data using literature and analysing court decisions from the human rights perspective. This study aims to determine the limits of tolerance for violence and corporal punishment. The court decisions have been taken as the data to be analysed from various locations where decisions have been issued were taken into consideration to depict the similarities and differences in deciding matters related to corporal punishment towards children. This article examines historical, cultural, and religious factors that influence the use of physical force, including interpretations of Islamic teachings. This paper also presents arguments for and against corporal punishment as an educational tool. This research sheds light on the complexities surrounding the permissibility of physical force in children's education and the conflicting views in society, providing insight into evolving understandings and legal perspectives on the subject.","PeriodicalId":32073,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Law Review","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol8.iss1.3014.pp115-132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the limitations of using physical force in educating children in Indonesia. It examines the prevalence of violence by parents and teachers in education. Increased public awareness and concern for children's rights have made the use of violence in education a taboo. This research uses a qualitative method with secondary data using literature and analysing court decisions from the human rights perspective. This study aims to determine the limits of tolerance for violence and corporal punishment. The court decisions have been taken as the data to be analysed from various locations where decisions have been issued were taken into consideration to depict the similarities and differences in deciding matters related to corporal punishment towards children. This article examines historical, cultural, and religious factors that influence the use of physical force, including interpretations of Islamic teachings. This paper also presents arguments for and against corporal punishment as an educational tool. This research sheds light on the complexities surrounding the permissibility of physical force in children's education and the conflicting views in society, providing insight into evolving understandings and legal perspectives on the subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿童教育中使用体力:从印度尼西亚法院的判决中学习
本文探讨了印度尼西亚在教育儿童时使用暴力的局限性。文章探讨了家长和教师在教育中使用暴力的普遍性。公众意识的提高和对儿童权利的关注使得在教育中使用暴力成为禁忌。本研究采用定性方法,利用文献和法院判决分析二手数据,从人权角度进行分析。本研究旨在确定对暴力和体罚的容忍限度。本研究将各地法院的判决作为数据进行分析,并考虑到各地法院在做出判决时的异同。本文研究了影响使用体罚的历史、文化和宗教因素,包括对伊斯兰教义的解释。本文还提出了支持和反对将体罚作为教育手段的论点。这项研究揭示了在儿童教育中允许使用体罚的复杂性以及社会上存在的相互冲突的观点,为人们深入了解对这一问题不断演变的理解和法律观点提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sriwijaya Law Review
Sriwijaya Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Can the Right to A Good and Healthy Environment be Claimed as a Human Right? Judaization in Palestine: Is It Genocide According to the 1998 Rome Statute? Criminal Legal Protection for Bona Fide Third Parties Over Assets in Corruption and Money Laundering Cases Mapping and Harmonizing Qanun on Sharia Financial Institutions Problematics of Inter-Regional Cooperation in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1