Lessons Learned from the CSWE Task Force to Advance Anti-Racism in the Social Work Education Policy and Accreditation Standards:

Q3 Social Sciences Advances in social work Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.18060/24989
Colita Nichols Fairfax, Michele Rountree, Andrea Murray-Lichtman, Rebecca Maldonado Moore, Michael Yellow Bird, Travis Albritton, M. Naseh, Elena Izaksonas, Tauchiana Williams
{"title":"Lessons Learned from the CSWE Task Force to Advance Anti-Racism in the Social Work Education Policy and Accreditation Standards:","authors":"Colita Nichols Fairfax, Michele Rountree, Andrea Murray-Lichtman, Rebecca Maldonado Moore, Michael Yellow Bird, Travis Albritton, M. Naseh, Elena Izaksonas, Tauchiana Williams","doi":"10.18060/24989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 25, 2020, Mr. George Floyd, a Black man, was murdered by Derek Chauvin, a White police officer in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In response to this disgusting display of police brutality, thousands of people all over the world began protesting Mr. Floyd’s killing. The Capital of the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia, became one of many flashpoints for the public’s rage against white supremacy and systemic racism as thousands of people flooded the historic Monument District to topple, dismantle and re-frame Confederate monuments with protest slogans. Policing in the United States is rooted in the historical memory of enslavement, the unrestrained and authorized misuse of power by law enforcement, and conflicting values of discourse community. Protestors employed historical memory, which includes resistance, tolerance and strength in the face of tremendously difficult circumstances (Corredor, Wills-Obregon, Asensio-Brouard, 2018, 184). This groundswell of protests merged with those that sprang up for Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and others slain by police violence, producing a demand for racial justice that could not be stymied.  Racial disparate treatment is embedded in police brutality and in all societal institutions. This movement calls into question social justice accountability within social work education, practice, and policy. Have the protests been enough? Will the profession of social work address its own complicity in maintaining racism?  \nTo advance anti-racist social work education, the CSWE Task Force for Advance Anti-Racism was conceptualized in summer 2020 to center anti-racism pedagogies and anti-racist learning environments. Several diverse social work leaders, educators, researchers, community organizers, and students came together to explore how the profession should be re-imagined as a profession that advances anti-racism and the decentering of whiteness. The task force members met to develop, discuss, and refine recommendations for CSWE on Education Policy and Accreditation (EPA).  Employing content analysis, the authors identified major themes that emanated from the work of the Task Force. Content themes include how racism, white supremacy and ethnocracy underscores social work as an applied social science that maintains information structures, paradigms, theories, and practices ensconced in academia. The praxis recommendations of the task force include adapting theoretical frameworks for anti-racist social work education; incorporating anti-racism and critical theories, such as Critical Race Theory; updating social work competencies; promoting equitable approaches to hiring and retaining BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) faculty in different positions; and, creating a new anti-racism commission to continue anti-racism work.  ","PeriodicalId":7430,"journal":{"name":"Advances in social work","volume":"66 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/24989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On May 25, 2020, Mr. George Floyd, a Black man, was murdered by Derek Chauvin, a White police officer in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In response to this disgusting display of police brutality, thousands of people all over the world began protesting Mr. Floyd’s killing. The Capital of the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia, became one of many flashpoints for the public’s rage against white supremacy and systemic racism as thousands of people flooded the historic Monument District to topple, dismantle and re-frame Confederate monuments with protest slogans. Policing in the United States is rooted in the historical memory of enslavement, the unrestrained and authorized misuse of power by law enforcement, and conflicting values of discourse community. Protestors employed historical memory, which includes resistance, tolerance and strength in the face of tremendously difficult circumstances (Corredor, Wills-Obregon, Asensio-Brouard, 2018, 184). This groundswell of protests merged with those that sprang up for Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and others slain by police violence, producing a demand for racial justice that could not be stymied.  Racial disparate treatment is embedded in police brutality and in all societal institutions. This movement calls into question social justice accountability within social work education, practice, and policy. Have the protests been enough? Will the profession of social work address its own complicity in maintaining racism?  To advance anti-racist social work education, the CSWE Task Force for Advance Anti-Racism was conceptualized in summer 2020 to center anti-racism pedagogies and anti-racist learning environments. Several diverse social work leaders, educators, researchers, community organizers, and students came together to explore how the profession should be re-imagined as a profession that advances anti-racism and the decentering of whiteness. The task force members met to develop, discuss, and refine recommendations for CSWE on Education Policy and Accreditation (EPA).  Employing content analysis, the authors identified major themes that emanated from the work of the Task Force. Content themes include how racism, white supremacy and ethnocracy underscores social work as an applied social science that maintains information structures, paradigms, theories, and practices ensconced in academia. The praxis recommendations of the task force include adapting theoretical frameworks for anti-racist social work education; incorporating anti-racism and critical theories, such as Critical Race Theory; updating social work competencies; promoting equitable approaches to hiring and retaining BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) faculty in different positions; and, creating a new anti-racism commission to continue anti-racism work.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 CSWE 在社会工作教育政策和认证标准中推进反种族主义工作组中吸取的经验教训:
2020 年 5 月 25 日,黑人乔治-弗洛伊德先生在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市被白人警官德里克-肖文杀害。针对这一令人作呕的警察暴行,世界各地成千上万的人开始抗议杀害弗洛伊德先生。数以千计的民众涌入历史悠久的纪念碑区,推倒、拆除并重新树立带有抗议标语的邦联纪念碑,弗吉尼亚州的里士满成为公众怒斥白人至上主义和系统性种族主义的众多爆发点之一。美国的警务工作植根于奴役的历史记忆、执法部门不受约束和授权的滥用权力以及相互冲突的社区话语价值观。抗议者运用了历史记忆,其中包括面对巨大困难环境时的抵抗、宽容和力量(Corredor、Wills-Obregon、Asensio-Brouard,2018,184)。这股抗议浪潮与为阿赫马德-阿伯里(Ahmaud Arbery)、布蕾娜-泰勒(Breonna Taylor)和其他被警察暴力杀害的人发起的抗议浪潮相融合,产生了一种无法阻挡的种族正义诉求。 种族差别待遇根植于警察暴力和所有社会机构之中。这场运动对社会工作教育、实践和政策中的社会正义责任提出了质疑。抗议活动是否足够?社会工作行业是否会正视自身在维持种族主义方面的共谋作用? 为了推进反种族主义的社会工作教育,2020 年夏天,CSWE 成立了 "推进反种族主义工作组"(CSWE Task Force for Advance Anti-Racism),以反种族主义教学法和反种族主义学习环境为中心。几位不同的社会工作领导者、教育工作者、研究人员、社区组织者和学生汇聚一堂,共同探讨应如何将社会工作专业重新塑造为一个推进反种族主义和去白人化的专业。工作组成员开会制定、讨论并完善了 CSWE 关于教育政策和认证(EPA)的建议。 通过内容分析,作者确定了特别小组工作中的主要议题。内容主题包括种族主义、白人至上主义和人种专制是如何强调社会工作是一门应用社会科学,是如何维持学术界的信息结构、范式、理论和实践的。特别工作组的实践建议包括:调整反种族主义社会工作教育的理论框架;纳入反种族主义和批判性理论,如批判性种族理论;更新社会工作能力;促进以公平的方式聘用和留住不同职位的 BIPOC(黑人、土著和有色人种)教师;以及创建一个新的反种族主义委员会,继续开展反种族主义工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in social work
Advances in social work Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond Limits Firearm Access and Safe Storage Grassroots Activism Impacting Rural LGBTQIA+ Communities Examining the Views of Master of Social Work (MSW) Graduates on the Grand Challenges for Social Work and Society Special Section Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1