Toward improved image‐based root phenotyping: Handling temporal and cross‐site domain shifts in crop root segmentation models

Travis Banet, Abraham George Smith, Rebecca K. McGrail, D. McNear, Hanna J. Poffenbarger
{"title":"Toward improved image‐based root phenotyping: Handling temporal and cross‐site domain shifts in crop root segmentation models","authors":"Travis Banet, Abraham George Smith, Rebecca K. McGrail, D. McNear, Hanna J. Poffenbarger","doi":"10.1002/ppj2.20094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crop root segmentation models developed through deep learning have increased the throughput of in situ crop phenotyping studies. However, models trained to identify roots in one image dataset may not accurately identify roots in another dataset, especially when the new dataset contains known differences, called domain shifts. The objective of this study was to quantify how model performance changes when models are used to segment image datasets that contain domain shifts and evaluate approaches to reduce error associated with domain shifts. We collected maize root images at two growth stages (V7 and R2) in a field experiment and manually segmented images to measure total root length (TRL). We developed five segmentation models and evaluated each model's ability to handle a temporal (growth‐stage) domain shift. For the V7 growth stage, a growth‐stage‐specific model trained only on images captured at the V7 growth stage was best suited for measuring TRL. At the R2 growth stage, combining images from both growth stages into a single dataset to train a model resulted in the most accurate TRL measurements. We applied two of the field models to images from a greenhouse experiment to evaluate how model performance changed when exposed to a cross‐site domain shift. Field models were less accurate than models trained only on the greenhouse images even when crop growth stage was identical. Although models may perform well for one experiment, model error increases when applied to images from different experiments even when crop species, growth stage, and soil type are similar.","PeriodicalId":504448,"journal":{"name":"The Plant Phenome Journal","volume":"394 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Plant Phenome Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Crop root segmentation models developed through deep learning have increased the throughput of in situ crop phenotyping studies. However, models trained to identify roots in one image dataset may not accurately identify roots in another dataset, especially when the new dataset contains known differences, called domain shifts. The objective of this study was to quantify how model performance changes when models are used to segment image datasets that contain domain shifts and evaluate approaches to reduce error associated with domain shifts. We collected maize root images at two growth stages (V7 and R2) in a field experiment and manually segmented images to measure total root length (TRL). We developed five segmentation models and evaluated each model's ability to handle a temporal (growth‐stage) domain shift. For the V7 growth stage, a growth‐stage‐specific model trained only on images captured at the V7 growth stage was best suited for measuring TRL. At the R2 growth stage, combining images from both growth stages into a single dataset to train a model resulted in the most accurate TRL measurements. We applied two of the field models to images from a greenhouse experiment to evaluate how model performance changed when exposed to a cross‐site domain shift. Field models were less accurate than models trained only on the greenhouse images even when crop growth stage was identical. Although models may perform well for one experiment, model error increases when applied to images from different experiments even when crop species, growth stage, and soil type are similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进基于图像的根系表型:处理作物根系细分模型中的时域和跨位点域变化
通过深度学习开发的作物根系分割模型提高了原位作物表型研究的产量。然而,为识别一个图像数据集中的根而训练的模型可能无法准确识别另一个数据集中的根,尤其是当新数据集包含已知差异(称为域偏移)时。本研究的目的是量化当模型用于分割包含域偏移的图像数据集时,模型性能会发生怎样的变化,并评估减少与域偏移相关的误差的方法。我们在田间试验中收集了两个生长阶段(V7 和 R2)的玉米根图像,并手动分割图像以测量根的总长度 (TRL)。我们开发了五个分割模型,并评估了每个模型处理时间(生长阶段)域偏移的能力。在 V7 生长阶段,只在 V7 生长阶段捕获的图像上训练的特定生长阶段模型最适合测量 TRL。在 R2 生长阶段,将两个生长阶段的图像合并成一个数据集来训练模型,可获得最准确的 TRL 测量结果。我们将两个野外模型应用于温室实验的图像,以评估模型性能在暴露于跨站点域转移时的变化情况。即使在作物生长阶段相同的情况下,田间模型的准确性也低于仅在温室图像上训练的模型。虽然模型在一个实验中可能表现良好,但当模型应用于不同实验的图像时,即使作物种类、生长阶段和土壤类型相似,模型误差也会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data driven discovery and quantification of hyperspectral leaf reflectance phenotypes across a maize diversity panel Estimating Fusarium head blight severity in winter wheat using deep learning and a spectral index Zero‐shot insect detection via weak language supervision Erratum to: Estimation of the nutritive value of grasslands with the Yara N‐sensor field spectrometer Adoption of unoccupied aerial systems in agricultural research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1