BESTMITTEL AND SILICA FUME EFFECT ON CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WITH SEAWATER CURING

Frianto Tandilino, Lolom Evalita Hutabarat, Risma Masniari Simanjuntak
{"title":"BESTMITTEL AND SILICA FUME EFFECT ON CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH WITH SEAWATER CURING","authors":"Frianto Tandilino, Lolom Evalita Hutabarat, Risma Masniari Simanjuntak","doi":"10.21009/jpensil.v13i1.39103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The frequency of tidal floods caused by seawater threatens coastal buildings. This study aims to see how using seawater for concrete treatment affects the resulting compressive strength. This study used additives such as Bestmittel to expedite hardening and boost compressive strength, as well as silica fume to increase porosity and prevent concrete from becoming porous owing to chloride ion intrusion from seawater. The findings of concrete compressive strength tests were achieved through laboratory testing using cylindrical test objects measuring 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in height. The test specimens were ordinary concrete with 0.6% bestmittel and a Silica Fume combination with varying percentages of 15%, 20%, and 25% substituting partial cement. Meanwhile, the concrete treatment employs both fresh water and seawater. Pressure tests were performed at 14 and 28 days. At 14 days, concrete with fresh water treatment and a bestmittel content of 0.6% and silica fume concentrations of 15%, 20%, and 25% have compressive strengths of 25.53 MPa, 27.11 MPa, and 26.04 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, it was 26.34 MPa, 27.61 MPa, and 26.75 MPa after 28 days of concrete age. At 14 consecutive days of concrete age, concrete with seawater treatment had a reduced compressive strength. 19.66 MPa, 22.13 MPa, and 23.07 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, at 28 days, the pressures were 20.53 MPa, 24.77 MPa, and 25.53 MPa. Using 6% bestmittel followed by 15-20% SF can boost the strength of the concrete and let it survive reduced compressive strength due to seawater infiltration.","PeriodicalId":106203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal PenSil","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal PenSil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v13i1.39103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequency of tidal floods caused by seawater threatens coastal buildings. This study aims to see how using seawater for concrete treatment affects the resulting compressive strength. This study used additives such as Bestmittel to expedite hardening and boost compressive strength, as well as silica fume to increase porosity and prevent concrete from becoming porous owing to chloride ion intrusion from seawater. The findings of concrete compressive strength tests were achieved through laboratory testing using cylindrical test objects measuring 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in height. The test specimens were ordinary concrete with 0.6% bestmittel and a Silica Fume combination with varying percentages of 15%, 20%, and 25% substituting partial cement. Meanwhile, the concrete treatment employs both fresh water and seawater. Pressure tests were performed at 14 and 28 days. At 14 days, concrete with fresh water treatment and a bestmittel content of 0.6% and silica fume concentrations of 15%, 20%, and 25% have compressive strengths of 25.53 MPa, 27.11 MPa, and 26.04 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, it was 26.34 MPa, 27.61 MPa, and 26.75 MPa after 28 days of concrete age. At 14 consecutive days of concrete age, concrete with seawater treatment had a reduced compressive strength. 19.66 MPa, 22.13 MPa, and 23.07 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, at 28 days, the pressures were 20.53 MPa, 24.77 MPa, and 25.53 MPa. Using 6% bestmittel followed by 15-20% SF can boost the strength of the concrete and let it survive reduced compressive strength due to seawater infiltration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bestmittel 和硅灰对海水养护混凝土抗压强度的影响
海水造成的潮汐洪水频发,威胁着沿海建筑。这项研究旨在了解使用海水处理混凝土会如何影响混凝土的抗压强度。这项研究使用 Bestmittel 等添加剂来加速硬化和提高抗压强度,并使用硅灰来增加孔隙率,防止混凝土因海水中氯离子的侵入而变得多孔。混凝土抗压强度测试结果是通过使用直径为 150 毫米、高度为 300 毫米的圆柱形测试物体进行实验室测试得出的。试验试件为普通混凝土,其中含有 0.6% 的贝斯特米特尔和硅灰组合,硅灰的比例分别为 15%、20% 和 25%,取代了部分水泥。同时,混凝土处理采用了淡水和海水。压力测试分别在 14 天和 28 天进行。14 天时,经淡水处理、贝氏剂含量为 0.6%、硅灰浓度为 15%、20% 和 25% 的混凝土抗压强度分别为 25.53 兆帕、27.11 兆帕和 26.04 兆帕。同时,混凝土龄期为 28 天后的抗压强度分别为 26.34 兆帕、27.61 兆帕和 26.75 兆帕。在连续 14 天的混凝土龄期内,经过海水处理的混凝土抗压强度有所降低。分别为 19.66 兆帕、22.13 兆帕和 23.07 兆帕。而在 28 天时,压力分别为 20.53 兆帕、24.77 兆帕和 25.53 兆帕。使用 6% 的贝斯特米特尔和 15-20% 的 SF 可以提高混凝土的强度,使其能够承受因海水渗透而降低的抗压强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OVERVIEW OF UNDERSTANDING AND PREPAREDNESS FOR EARTHQUAKES IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS DURABILITY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE MIXTURE (AC-WC) USING CRUMB RUBBER WASTE AS AN ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AND PALM FRUIT ASH AS FILLER IMPROVING VOCATIONAL STUDENT COMPETENCIES THROUGH INDUSTRIAL CLASS-BASED EXPERIANTIAL LEARNING GLOW IN THE DARK MEDIAN FRONTAGE AND PEDESTRIAN AS A GUIDE FOR DRIVERS AT NIGHT THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOTS-BASED TECHNICAL MECHANICAL SUBJECT INSTRUMENTS USING A CLASSICAL TEST THEORY APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1