‘I want you to want me’: How owners value cats' choices has implications for cat containment

Kathryn Ovenden, Imogen Bassett, Christine L. Sumner
{"title":"‘I want you to want me’: How owners value cats' choices has implications for cat containment","authors":"Kathryn Ovenden, Imogen Bassett, Christine L. Sumner","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nGlobally, cats are a common companion animal. Allowing companion cats to roam away from home can have negative impacts on native wildlife and cat welfare. A more contained cat lifestyle can limit the detrimental impacts of roaming; however, this continues to be an uncommon choice for cat owners in many countries.\n\nCommunication strategies that focus on welfare benefits for cats have successfully motivated some owners to prevent their cats from roaming. However, little is known about other factors influencing owners' decisions about roaming, such as the owner–cat relationship and their cat's membership in the local community.\n\nWe conducted five focus groups with 31 cat owners in Aotearoa New Zealand to understand these factors.\n\nUsing thematic analysis, we identified three major themes that describe how owners view the impacts of cat containment on their relationship with their cat/s. First, finding a balance between enabling and restricting choices to ensure the cat's welfare is at the heart of the owner–cat relationship. Critically, the cat's choice to repeatedly return home reaffirms the owner–cat relationship. Second, striking the right balance in the provision of choice and ensuring welfare are contingent on the cat's characteristics. Owners providing their cat/s with the choice to leave home are perceived to be positively associated with enabling their freedom, independence and curiosity. Third, owners perceived cats to belong in many spaces occupied by humans outside of their property, despite most participants living near populations of significant threatened species.\n\nThe choice to allow a cat to roam from home impacts cat welfare, the owner–cat relationship and membership in the local cat, human and wildlife community. Efforts to facilitate the shift to a contained cat lifestyle need to help owners provide choices for their cats that will meet their welfare needs and foster the owner–cat relationship. Locally relevant strategies that consider the owners' views as members of their community will likely be more successful.\n\nRead the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":508650,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":"83 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, cats are a common companion animal. Allowing companion cats to roam away from home can have negative impacts on native wildlife and cat welfare. A more contained cat lifestyle can limit the detrimental impacts of roaming; however, this continues to be an uncommon choice for cat owners in many countries. Communication strategies that focus on welfare benefits for cats have successfully motivated some owners to prevent their cats from roaming. However, little is known about other factors influencing owners' decisions about roaming, such as the owner–cat relationship and their cat's membership in the local community. We conducted five focus groups with 31 cat owners in Aotearoa New Zealand to understand these factors. Using thematic analysis, we identified three major themes that describe how owners view the impacts of cat containment on their relationship with their cat/s. First, finding a balance between enabling and restricting choices to ensure the cat's welfare is at the heart of the owner–cat relationship. Critically, the cat's choice to repeatedly return home reaffirms the owner–cat relationship. Second, striking the right balance in the provision of choice and ensuring welfare are contingent on the cat's characteristics. Owners providing their cat/s with the choice to leave home are perceived to be positively associated with enabling their freedom, independence and curiosity. Third, owners perceived cats to belong in many spaces occupied by humans outside of their property, despite most participants living near populations of significant threatened species. The choice to allow a cat to roam from home impacts cat welfare, the owner–cat relationship and membership in the local cat, human and wildlife community. Efforts to facilitate the shift to a contained cat lifestyle need to help owners provide choices for their cats that will meet their welfare needs and foster the owner–cat relationship. Locally relevant strategies that consider the owners' views as members of their community will likely be more successful. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我希望你想要我":主人如何看待猫咪的选择对猫咪围栏的影响
在全球范围内,猫是一种常见的伴侣动物。允许伴侣猫离家漫游会对本地野生动物和猫的福利产生负面影响。注重猫咪福利的沟通策略已经成功地促使一些主人阻止猫咪漫游。我们与新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的 31 位猫主人进行了五次焦点小组讨论,以了解这些因素。通过主题分析,我们确定了三大主题,描述了猫主人如何看待猫咪限制对他们与猫咪之间关系的影响。首先,在确保猫咪福利的前提下,在允许和限制猫咪选择之间找到平衡点是猫主人与猫咪关系的核心。最重要的是,猫咪选择反复回家的行为再次确认了主人与猫咪之间的关系。其次,在提供选择和确保猫咪福利之间取得适当平衡取决于猫咪的特性。主人为猫咪提供离家出走的选择被认为与猫咪的自由、独立和好奇心有着积极的联系。第三,尽管大多数参与者都居住在重要濒危物种种群附近,但主人认为猫咪属于他们财产以外的许多人类居住空间。允许猫咪离家漫游的选择会影响到猫咪的福利、主人与猫咪的关系以及猫咪在当地、人类和野生动物社区中的成员身份。为促进猫咪生活方式的转变,需要帮助主人为猫咪提供选择,以满足猫咪的福利需求并促进主人与猫咪之间的关系。考虑到猫主人作为社区成员的观点的本地相关策略可能会更成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Defining socioecological reciprocity: Intentionality, mutualism or collateral effect Dynamic reciprocal contributions between Indigenous communities and cultural keystone species: A study case in Western Ecuador Cultural stewardship in urban spaces: Reviving Indigenous knowledge for the restoration of nature Communities in ecosystem restoration: The role of inclusive values and local elites' narrative innovations Reintroduced, but not accepted: Stakeholder perceptions of beavers in Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1