Comparative Association of Substance Use, Psychosocial Factors, and Suicidal Ideation in Turkish Youth

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS Adolescent Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.2174/0122106766257273240122105336
Parna Prajapati, Ali Unlu, Andres Pumariega
{"title":"Comparative Association of Substance Use, Psychosocial Factors, and Suicidal Ideation in Turkish Youth","authors":"Parna Prajapati, Ali Unlu, Andres Pumariega","doi":"10.2174/0122106766257273240122105336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe existing literature on the contribution of substance use\nand psychosocial risk factors in the development of suicidal ideation in the\nTurkish youth provides limited information. This study aims to compare the\nrelative association of substance use and psychosocial risk factors with suicidal\nideations in a sample of high school students in Istanbul.\n\n\n\nHigh school students were administered a survey of 66 questions in the\nschool setting. The total number of students surveyed was 31,604 by the Istanbul\nDepartment of Education, and the primary questions and their sub-questions\ngenerated dependent and independent variables that were used in this study. The\nrelationship between substance use, psychosocial factors, and suicidal ideation\nwas explored in this study. Logistic regression was used with independent\nvariables, such as substance use, light users, and heavy users and dependent\nvariables as suicidal ideation. The variation explained by this model was\ncompared to the variation explained by the psychosocial factors (age, gender,\nschool type, immigration status, perceived family affluence, parental education,\nschool grades, self-esteem scale, faith scale, anomie scale, anxiety scale,\ndepression scale, irritability scale, antisocial personality scale, time with peers,\ntime with family, parental involvement, family substance use, and peer influence)\nwhile exploring the strength of the associations for each factor.\n\n\n\nPsychosocial factors explained 33.8 % variance in the dependent\nvariable, i.e., suicidal ideation, whereas substance use among those participants\nexplained only 2.2 % variance in predicting suicidal ideation. Restricting analyses\nto heavy drug users found a consistently low explained variance of about 1.5 %\nof suicidal ideation in this population.\n\n\n\nThe psychosocial factors are stronger predictors of suicidal ideation\nas compared to the substance use risk factors in a sample of Turkish youth.\n","PeriodicalId":43326,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122106766257273240122105336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature on the contribution of substance use and psychosocial risk factors in the development of suicidal ideation in the Turkish youth provides limited information. This study aims to compare the relative association of substance use and psychosocial risk factors with suicidal ideations in a sample of high school students in Istanbul. High school students were administered a survey of 66 questions in the school setting. The total number of students surveyed was 31,604 by the Istanbul Department of Education, and the primary questions and their sub-questions generated dependent and independent variables that were used in this study. The relationship between substance use, psychosocial factors, and suicidal ideation was explored in this study. Logistic regression was used with independent variables, such as substance use, light users, and heavy users and dependent variables as suicidal ideation. The variation explained by this model was compared to the variation explained by the psychosocial factors (age, gender, school type, immigration status, perceived family affluence, parental education, school grades, self-esteem scale, faith scale, anomie scale, anxiety scale, depression scale, irritability scale, antisocial personality scale, time with peers, time with family, parental involvement, family substance use, and peer influence) while exploring the strength of the associations for each factor. Psychosocial factors explained 33.8 % variance in the dependent variable, i.e., suicidal ideation, whereas substance use among those participants explained only 2.2 % variance in predicting suicidal ideation. Restricting analyses to heavy drug users found a consistently low explained variance of about 1.5 % of suicidal ideation in this population. The psychosocial factors are stronger predictors of suicidal ideation as compared to the substance use risk factors in a sample of Turkish youth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其青少年药物使用、社会心理因素和自杀意念之间的比较关系
关于药物使用和社会心理风险因素对土耳其青少年自杀倾向发展的影响,现有文献提供的信息十分有限。本研究旨在比较伊斯坦布尔高中生样本中药物使用和社会心理风险因素与自杀倾向之间的关联。伊斯坦布尔教育局共调查了 31604 名学生,主问题及其子问题产生了本研究中使用的因变量和自变量。本研究探讨了药物使用、社会心理因素和自杀意念之间的关系。采用逻辑回归法,自变量为药物使用、轻度使用者和重度使用者,因变量为自杀意念。该模型所解释的变异与心理社会因素(年龄、性别、学校类型、移民身份、家庭富裕感、父母教育程度、学校成绩、自尊量表、信仰量表、厌世量表、焦虑量表、抑郁量表、易怒量表、反社会人格量表、与同伴相处时间、与家人相处时间、父母参与、家庭药物使用和同伴影响)所解释的变异进行了比较,同时探讨了各因素之间的关联强度。心理社会因素解释了因变量(即自杀意念)中 33.8% 的方差、而这些参与者使用药物的情况仅解释了预测自杀意念的 2.2% 的方差。与药物使用风险因素相比,社会心理因素对土耳其青少年样本中自杀意念的预测作用更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Psychiatry
Adolescent Psychiatry PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Adolescent Psychiatry a peer-reviewed journal, aims to provide mental health professionals who work with adolescents with current information relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry reports of original research, critical reviews of topics relevant to practitioners, clinical observations with analysis and discussion, analysis of philosophical, ethical or social aspects of the fields of psychiatry and mental health, case reports with discussions, letters, and position papers. Topics include adolescent development and developmental psychopathology, psychotherapy and other psychosocial treatment approaches, psychopharmacology, and service settings and programs. The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, The primary focus of the work should be on adolescents, transition-aged youth, or emerging adults, that is, persons 12-24 years of age . Articles on families of adolescents, or adults who have been followed since adolescence will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Substance Use, and Related Emergency Room Visits, and Continuum of Care Psychosomatic Problems Among Adolescents During/Post the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review Factors Associated with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Adolescents Experiencing Earthquake Trauma The Role of Identity in the Relationship between PTSD and Executive Functioning Review of Clinical Considerations in the Management of Adolescents with ADHD During Ramadan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1