Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger

IF 0.5 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1075/sl.23009.mel
Eric Mélac, Joanna Bialek
{"title":"Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger","authors":"Eric Mélac, Joanna Bialek","doi":"10.1075/sl.23009.mel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article investigates the grammaticalization patterns of evidentiality from a cross-linguistic perspective\n with a focus on Lhasa Tibetan. It documents the history of the evidential morphemes ’dug, -song, -bzhag, and\n =ze from Old Literary Tibetan to modern spoken Lhasa Tibetan. Our analyses show that these morphemes started\n grammaticalizing before encoding evidentiality. We argue that, through pragmatic strengthening, evidentiality tends to infiltrate\n forms which have already grammaticalized to express other semantic domains. These patterns of grammaticalization are confirmed by\n diachronic and reconstructed data from genetically unrelated languages. Evidentiality thus tends to be a ‘grammaticalization\n passenger’ (i.e., a conventionalized meaning which used to be merely implied from the recurrent contexts of a grammaticalized\n form) rather than a ‘grammaticalization target’ (i.e., a functional domain which triggers grammaticalization). This may explain\n why evidentiality is less often grammaticalized than other notions, such as time or modality, in the world’s languages.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23009.mel","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the grammaticalization patterns of evidentiality from a cross-linguistic perspective with a focus on Lhasa Tibetan. It documents the history of the evidential morphemes ’dug, -song, -bzhag, and =ze from Old Literary Tibetan to modern spoken Lhasa Tibetan. Our analyses show that these morphemes started grammaticalizing before encoding evidentiality. We argue that, through pragmatic strengthening, evidentiality tends to infiltrate forms which have already grammaticalized to express other semantic domains. These patterns of grammaticalization are confirmed by diachronic and reconstructed data from genetically unrelated languages. Evidentiality thus tends to be a ‘grammaticalization passenger’ (i.e., a conventionalized meaning which used to be merely implied from the recurrent contexts of a grammaticalized form) rather than a ‘grammaticalization target’ (i.e., a functional domain which triggers grammaticalization). This may explain why evidentiality is less often grammaticalized than other notions, such as time or modality, in the world’s languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为语法化乘客的证据性
本文以拉萨藏语为中心,从跨语言的角度研究了证据性的语法化模式。文章记录了 "挖"、"歌"、"巴扎格 "和"=泽 "等证据性语素从旧文学藏语到现代拉萨藏语口语的历史。我们的分析表明,这些语素在编码证据性之前就已经开始语法化了。我们认为,通过语用强化,证据性往往会渗透到已经语法化的形式中,以表达其他语义领域。这些语法化模式得到了来自基因无关语言的非同步和重建数据的证实。因此,证据性倾向于成为 "语法化的乘客"(即一种常规化的意义,过去只是从语法化形式的重复语境中隐含出来的),而不是 "语法化的目标"(即引发语法化的功能域)。这也许可以解释为什么在世界语言中,"证据性"(evidentiality)比其他概念(如时间或情态)更少被语法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
期刊最新文献
Morphosyntactic retention and innovation in Sheng, a youth language or stylect of Kenya Discontinuous past interpretation in Abaza What can be said? Inflection class interactions and valency changes in Matlatzinca Asymmetry in temporal specification between affirmation and negation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1