Perspectives Regarding Methodological Considerations and Challenges of Conducting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Nursing Research

N. Alrida, Amal Mohammad Tayseer Ababneh, Basheer Al-Zu'bi
{"title":"Perspectives Regarding Methodological Considerations and Challenges of Conducting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Nursing Research","authors":"N. Alrida, Amal Mohammad Tayseer Ababneh, Basheer Al-Zu'bi","doi":"10.25159/2520-5293/15071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomised Control Trials (RCT) serve as the gold standard in research design, offering valuable insights into evaluating the impact of nursing interventions on patient health outcomes. This paper explores the methodological considerations and challenges inherent in designing and conducting RCTs within the nursing context. The inclusion criteria involved a thorough search across reputable databases, including CEINAHL, EBSCO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, spanning any period due to the scarcity of relevant material. Articles were selected based on their alignment with key considerations such as randomisation, blinding, sample size calculations, outcome measures, and ethical aspects. Data extraction involved findings related to methodological considerations and challenges faced by nurse researchers in RCT design and implementation. Various challenges arise when applying these considerations due to the nature of nursing interventions and ethical concerns. Proposed solutions include comprehensive informed consent, mixed-methods approaches, and the cluster-randomization process. This paper underscores the role of nurse researchers in overcoming challenges and fostering evidence-based practice. Integrating robust methodological strategies and ethical considerations ensures the validity and reliability of nursing RCTs, contributing to improved patient care.","PeriodicalId":517190,"journal":{"name":"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"76 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/15071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Randomised Control Trials (RCT) serve as the gold standard in research design, offering valuable insights into evaluating the impact of nursing interventions on patient health outcomes. This paper explores the methodological considerations and challenges inherent in designing and conducting RCTs within the nursing context. The inclusion criteria involved a thorough search across reputable databases, including CEINAHL, EBSCO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library, spanning any period due to the scarcity of relevant material. Articles were selected based on their alignment with key considerations such as randomisation, blinding, sample size calculations, outcome measures, and ethical aspects. Data extraction involved findings related to methodological considerations and challenges faced by nurse researchers in RCT design and implementation. Various challenges arise when applying these considerations due to the nature of nursing interventions and ethical concerns. Proposed solutions include comprehensive informed consent, mixed-methods approaches, and the cluster-randomization process. This paper underscores the role of nurse researchers in overcoming challenges and fostering evidence-based practice. Integrating robust methodological strategies and ethical considerations ensures the validity and reliability of nursing RCTs, contributing to improved patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于护理研究中开展随机对照试验 (RCT) 的方法论考虑因素和挑战的观点
随机对照试验(RCT)是研究设计的黄金标准,为评估护理干预措施对患者健康结果的影响提供了宝贵的见解。本文探讨了在护理领域设计和开展 RCT 所固有的方法论考虑因素和挑战。由于相关资料稀缺,纳入标准包括在 CEINAHL、EBSCO、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library 等知名数据库中进行彻底搜索,搜索时间跨度不限。文章的选择基于其是否符合随机化、盲法、样本量计算、结果测量和伦理等关键因素。数据提取涉及方法学方面的考虑因素以及护士研究人员在 RCT 设计和实施中面临的挑战。由于护理干预的性质和伦理问题,在应用这些考虑因素时会遇到各种挑战。建议的解决方案包括全面的知情同意、混合方法和分组随机过程。本文强调了护士研究人员在克服挑战和促进循证实践中的作用。将稳健的方法策略与伦理考虑因素相结合,可确保护理 RCT 的有效性和可靠性,有助于改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Contributing to Work Stress among Nurses in Hadiya Zone’s Public Hospitals, Central Ethiopia Preparedness for Natural Disasters among Volunteers in East Java, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Services and Associated Factors among HIV-Positive Women at Mzuzu Central Hospital, Malawi A Scoping Review of Nurse-Led Medical-Surgical Knowledge Translation Interventions to Improve In-Hospital Clinical Practice in the WHO Afro Region Analysis of Dominant Factors Affecting Pre-Hospital Stroke Management in Kupang City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1