Effectiveness of a Multispecies Synbiotic on Functional Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.5812/jjnpp-141520
Arash Kazemi Veisari, Shahin Hajiebrahimi, Hajar Shokri-Afra, H. Fakheri, Iradj Maleki, T. Taghvaei, Vahid Hosseini, Versa Omrani-Nava, Mahboobe Ebrahimi, Amir Elhaei, Seyed Mohammad Valizadeh Toosi
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Multispecies Synbiotic on Functional Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Arash Kazemi Veisari, Shahin Hajiebrahimi, Hajar Shokri-Afra, H. Fakheri, Iradj Maleki, T. Taghvaei, Vahid Hosseini, Versa Omrani-Nava, Mahboobe Ebrahimi, Amir Elhaei, Seyed Mohammad Valizadeh Toosi","doi":"10.5812/jjnpp-141520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Changes in the intestinal microbial flora may contribute to the occurrence and intensification of functional constipation (FC). Probiotics have shown promise as a potential alternative treatment for constipation. Objectives: The main goal of this study is to assess the effects of an Iranian multispecies synbiotic supplement on FC. Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 115 adult patients who met the Rome IV criteria for FC after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to receive either psyllium (n = 57) or psyllium plus synbiotic (n = 58) daily for 4 weeks. The treatment response was evaluated based on changes in stool consistency (based on the Bristol scale), bloating severity, and constipation intensity (based on the Wexner Constipation Scoring System), and those with a partial to excellent response were considered treatment successes. Results: The two groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, and BMI. The downward trend of stool consistency, bloating, as well as, constipation intensity was significant after 2 weeks of synbiotic-containing intervention. Treatment success after 4 weeks was 75.44% in the synbiotic group, compared to 30.91% in the psyllium-alone group (P < 0.001), indicating the superior efficiency of the synbiotic. Neither treatment exhibited adverse effects (P = 0.924), although psyllium was found to be less tolerable than the synbiotic (P = 0.026). Conclusions: Multispecies synbiotic intake for 4 weeks may be a promising treatment option for FC, given its striking favorable effects on constipation severity, safety, and tolerability.","PeriodicalId":17745,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-141520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Changes in the intestinal microbial flora may contribute to the occurrence and intensification of functional constipation (FC). Probiotics have shown promise as a potential alternative treatment for constipation. Objectives: The main goal of this study is to assess the effects of an Iranian multispecies synbiotic supplement on FC. Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) recruited 115 adult patients who met the Rome IV criteria for FC after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to receive either psyllium (n = 57) or psyllium plus synbiotic (n = 58) daily for 4 weeks. The treatment response was evaluated based on changes in stool consistency (based on the Bristol scale), bloating severity, and constipation intensity (based on the Wexner Constipation Scoring System), and those with a partial to excellent response were considered treatment successes. Results: The two groups did not differ in terms of sex, age, and BMI. The downward trend of stool consistency, bloating, as well as, constipation intensity was significant after 2 weeks of synbiotic-containing intervention. Treatment success after 4 weeks was 75.44% in the synbiotic group, compared to 30.91% in the psyllium-alone group (P < 0.001), indicating the superior efficiency of the synbiotic. Neither treatment exhibited adverse effects (P = 0.924), although psyllium was found to be less tolerable than the synbiotic (P = 0.026). Conclusions: Multispecies synbiotic intake for 4 weeks may be a promising treatment option for FC, given its striking favorable effects on constipation severity, safety, and tolerability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多菌种复合益生菌对功能性便秘的疗效:随机对照试验
背景:肠道微生物菌群的变化可能会导致功能性便秘(FC)的发生和加重。益生菌有望成为治疗便秘的潜在替代疗法。研究目的本研究的主要目的是评估伊朗多菌种合成益生菌补充剂对功能性便秘的影响。方法:这是一项随机对照试验(RCT):这项随机对照试验(RCT)招募了 115 名成年患者,这些患者在满足纳入标准后,符合 FC 的罗马 IV 标准。他们被随机分配到每天服用银翘散(57 人)或银翘散加合生元(58 人),为期 4 周。根据大便稠度(基于布里斯托尔量表)、腹胀严重程度和便秘强度(基于韦克斯纳便秘评分系统)的变化评估治疗反应,部分反应到极佳反应者被视为治疗成功。结果两组患者在性别、年龄和体重指数方面没有差异。在含合成益生菌的干预措施实施 2 周后,粪便稠度、腹胀以及便秘强度均呈显著下降趋势。4 周后,合生元组的治疗成功率为 75.44%,而单用银莲花组的成功率为 30.91%(P < 0.001),这表明合生元具有更高的效率。两种疗法均未出现不良反应(P = 0.924),但发现银翘片的耐受性低于合生素(P = 0.026)。结论鉴于多菌种合生元对便秘严重程度、安全性和耐受性的显著有利影响,服用 4 周的多菌种合生元可能是一种很有前景的 FC 治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Antileishmania, Immune Modulation and Apoptosis Induction by Astragalus ecbatanus Extract Against Leishmania tropica Chemical Constituents of the Artemisia ciniformis Aerial Parts Grown in the Northeast of Iran and Their Chemotaxonomic Significance Evaluation of the Protective and Healing Effects of Heracleum lasiopetalum Boiss on a Modified Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Model in Rats Unveiling Therapeutic Effects of Thymbra spicata L. on Cystic Echinococcosis In Vivo Wound-Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Honey Produced by Melipona beecheii Bees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1