Vaccine Decision-Making Influences - Insights from Severe COVID-19 Survivors: A Qualitative Study

{"title":"Vaccine Decision-Making Influences - Insights from Severe COVID-19 Survivors: A Qualitative Study","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/mcr.09.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination have been critical for reducing death rates, severe illness, and severe long-term health risks; however, vaccine hesitancy has emerged as a key challenge. Understanding survivors’ perspectives on vaccination, given their direct virus experience and elevated risks, is critical. This study explores COVID-19 vaccination decision-making among Romanian adult survivors to gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy within this societal context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2022-April 2023 with 30 participants (ages 35-76) previously hospitalized for severe COVID-19. Before contacting COVID-19, 26.6% of participants accepted vaccine, and an additional 50% chose to accept following their discharge. Thematic analysis identified four main themes: Severe Illness as a Catalyst for Vaccine Acceptancce, Vaccine Adverse Reactions Fueling Hesitancy, Accepting influence from trustworthy relationship and, General disbelief and Conspiracy Theories. This study’s findings indicate that many participants were deeply affected by their own severe experiences with COVID-19. For these participants, their traumatic experience was ultimately the main factor that motivated them to proactively seek out reliable information, ignore conspiracy theories, and engage diligently in recommended safety behaviours. Nevertheless, many survivors still opted against vaccination after hospital discharge. This qualitative study advances understanding of the intricacies underlying COVID-19 vaccination decision-making amongst survivors.","PeriodicalId":503698,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Clinical Research","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/mcr.09.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccination have been critical for reducing death rates, severe illness, and severe long-term health risks; however, vaccine hesitancy has emerged as a key challenge. Understanding survivors’ perspectives on vaccination, given their direct virus experience and elevated risks, is critical. This study explores COVID-19 vaccination decision-making among Romanian adult survivors to gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy within this societal context. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2022-April 2023 with 30 participants (ages 35-76) previously hospitalized for severe COVID-19. Before contacting COVID-19, 26.6% of participants accepted vaccine, and an additional 50% chose to accept following their discharge. Thematic analysis identified four main themes: Severe Illness as a Catalyst for Vaccine Acceptancce, Vaccine Adverse Reactions Fueling Hesitancy, Accepting influence from trustworthy relationship and, General disbelief and Conspiracy Theories. This study’s findings indicate that many participants were deeply affected by their own severe experiences with COVID-19. For these participants, their traumatic experience was ultimately the main factor that motivated them to proactively seek out reliable information, ignore conspiracy theories, and engage diligently in recommended safety behaviours. Nevertheless, many survivors still opted against vaccination after hospital discharge. This qualitative study advances understanding of the intricacies underlying COVID-19 vaccination decision-making amongst survivors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫苗决策的影响因素--来自严重 COVID-19 幸存者的启示:定性研究
疫苗接种对于降低死亡率、严重疾病和严重的长期健康风险至关重要;然而,疫苗接种犹豫不决已成为一项关键挑战。鉴于幸存者的直接病毒经历和高风险,了解他们对疫苗接种的看法至关重要。本研究探讨了罗马尼亚成年幸存者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策,以深入了解在这种社会背景下影响疫苗接受和犹豫的因素。2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月,我们对 30 名曾因严重 COVID-19 住院的参与者(35-76 岁)进行了半结构式访谈。在接触 COVID-19 之前,26.6% 的参与者接受了疫苗,另有 50% 的参与者在出院后选择接受疫苗。主题分析确定了四大主题:严重疾病是接受疫苗的催化剂、疫苗不良反应导致犹豫不决、接受来自可信关系的影响以及普遍不相信和阴谋论。本研究的结果表明,许多参与者深受 COVID-19 的严重影响。对这些参与者来说,他们的创伤经历最终成为促使他们主动寻找可靠信息、忽视阴谋论并努力采取建议的安全行为的主要因素。然而,许多幸存者在出院后仍然选择不接种疫苗。这项定性研究加深了人们对幸存者做出 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策的复杂性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recurrent Benign Acute Childhood Myositis (BACM) and Incidental Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH); A Case Study and Discussion IgA Vasculitis Secondary to Enterococcus Faecalis Cardiac Device Infective Endocarditis; A Case Report, Discussion of the Literature and Protocol for Assessment of Inflammatory Skin Lesions in Emergency Medicine Arizona and COVID-19: Four-Year Experience 2020-23 Tanning Melanotan Jabs and Nasal Spray: Safe or Not? Enzyme Therapy - A Revolution in Medicine?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1